Cargando…

Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives

Tiotropium bromide is an anticholinergic agent that has gained worldwide acceptance as a first-line, once daily maintenance therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence base in the past 10 years on the de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yohannes, Abebaw M, Connolly, Martin J, Hanania, Nicola A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23515335
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S28576
_version_ 1782475697203183616
author Yohannes, Abebaw M
Connolly, Martin J
Hanania, Nicola A
author_facet Yohannes, Abebaw M
Connolly, Martin J
Hanania, Nicola A
author_sort Yohannes, Abebaw M
collection PubMed
description Tiotropium bromide is an anticholinergic agent that has gained worldwide acceptance as a first-line, once daily maintenance therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence base in the past 10 years on the development of tiotropium and its efficacy compared to other able interventions such as long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), as well as to assess its safety profile and its effects on health-related outcomes in patients with COPD. Treatment with tiotropium bromide has generally improved patients’ health-related quality of life, reduced the number of patients suffering from acute exacerbations, decreased the number of hospitalizations, improved dyspnea, and reduced adverse events compared to placebo. In the past decade, several studies have examined the safety and efficacy of tiotropium in comparison to placebo and to LABAs (salmeterol, formoterol, and indacaterol) over periods ranging from 3 months to 48 months of follow-up. Head-to-head comparisons of tiotropium 18 μg (once daily) with salmeterol 50 μg (twice daily) in well-controlled trials demonstrated that tiotropium was superior in reducing acute exacerbation events and in improving quality of life. In a few short-term studies, indacaterol was comparable to tiotropium in its efficacy in improving health-related outcomes. Although the safety record of tiotropium has been exemplary in comparison to placebo, anticholinergic events such as dry mouth can be encountered in some patients. While the long-term safety of tiotropium when delivered in the HandiHaler(®) has been well documented, its delivery using the Respimat(®) Soft Mist Inhaler™ was associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular complications, including increased mortality when compared to placebo. The exact mechanism for this is not known but is being investigated in a large multinational study that will evaluate the long-term safety of different doses of tiotropium delivered by the Respimat(®) soft mist inhaler versus the HandiHaler(®). Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium in comparison with novel LABAs such as indacaterol and vilanterol, and with other emerging novel anticholinergic agents such as aclidinium bromide and NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3600941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36009412013-03-19 Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives Yohannes, Abebaw M Connolly, Martin J Hanania, Nicola A Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Review Tiotropium bromide is an anticholinergic agent that has gained worldwide acceptance as a first-line, once daily maintenance therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence base in the past 10 years on the development of tiotropium and its efficacy compared to other able interventions such as long-acting beta agonists (LABAs), as well as to assess its safety profile and its effects on health-related outcomes in patients with COPD. Treatment with tiotropium bromide has generally improved patients’ health-related quality of life, reduced the number of patients suffering from acute exacerbations, decreased the number of hospitalizations, improved dyspnea, and reduced adverse events compared to placebo. In the past decade, several studies have examined the safety and efficacy of tiotropium in comparison to placebo and to LABAs (salmeterol, formoterol, and indacaterol) over periods ranging from 3 months to 48 months of follow-up. Head-to-head comparisons of tiotropium 18 μg (once daily) with salmeterol 50 μg (twice daily) in well-controlled trials demonstrated that tiotropium was superior in reducing acute exacerbation events and in improving quality of life. In a few short-term studies, indacaterol was comparable to tiotropium in its efficacy in improving health-related outcomes. Although the safety record of tiotropium has been exemplary in comparison to placebo, anticholinergic events such as dry mouth can be encountered in some patients. While the long-term safety of tiotropium when delivered in the HandiHaler(®) has been well documented, its delivery using the Respimat(®) Soft Mist Inhaler™ was associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular complications, including increased mortality when compared to placebo. The exact mechanism for this is not known but is being investigated in a large multinational study that will evaluate the long-term safety of different doses of tiotropium delivered by the Respimat(®) soft mist inhaler versus the HandiHaler(®). Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy and safety of tiotropium in comparison with novel LABAs such as indacaterol and vilanterol, and with other emerging novel anticholinergic agents such as aclidinium bromide and NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide). Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3600941/ /pubmed/23515335 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S28576 Text en © 2013 Yohannes et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Yohannes, Abebaw M
Connolly, Martin J
Hanania, Nicola A
Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
title Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
title_full Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
title_fullStr Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
title_short Ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
title_sort ten years of tiotropium: clinical impact and patient perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3600941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23515335
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S28576
work_keys_str_mv AT yohannesabebawm tenyearsoftiotropiumclinicalimpactandpatientperspectives
AT connollymartinj tenyearsoftiotropiumclinicalimpactandpatientperspectives
AT hananianicolaa tenyearsoftiotropiumclinicalimpactandpatientperspectives