Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study
BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir and emtricitabine effectively prevents new HIV infections. The optimal scenario for implementing PrEP where most infections are averted at the lowest cost is unknown. We determined the impact of different PrEP strategies on averting new infe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059549 |
_version_ | 1782475717898928128 |
---|---|
author | Nichols, Brooke E. Boucher, Charles A. B. van Dijk, Janneke H. Thuma, Phil E. Nouwen, Jan L. Baltussen, Rob van de Wijgert, Janneke Sloot, Peter M. A. van de Vijver, David A. M. C. |
author_facet | Nichols, Brooke E. Boucher, Charles A. B. van Dijk, Janneke H. Thuma, Phil E. Nouwen, Jan L. Baltussen, Rob van de Wijgert, Janneke Sloot, Peter M. A. van de Vijver, David A. M. C. |
author_sort | Nichols, Brooke E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir and emtricitabine effectively prevents new HIV infections. The optimal scenario for implementing PrEP where most infections are averted at the lowest cost is unknown. We determined the impact of different PrEP strategies on averting new infections, prevalence, drug resistance and cost-effectiveness in Macha, a rural setting in Zambia. METHODS: A deterministic mathematical model of HIV transmission was constructed using data from the Macha epidemic (antenatal prevalence 7.7%). Antiretroviral therapy is started at CD4<350 cells/mm(3). We compared the number of infections averted, cost-effectiveness, and potential emergence of drug resistance of two ends of the prioritization spectrum: prioritizing PrEP to half of the most sexually active individuals (5–15% of the total population), versus randomly putting 40–60% of the total population on PrEP. RESULTS: Prioritizing PrEP to individuals with the highest sexual activity resulted in more infections averted than a non-prioritized strategy over ten years (31% and 23% reduction in new infections respectively), and also a lower HIV prevalence after ten years (5.7%, 6.4% respectively). The strategy was very cost-effective at $323 per quality adjusted life year gained and appeared to be both less costly and more effective than the non-prioritized strategy. The prevalence of drug resistance due to PrEP was as high as 11.6% when all assumed breakthrough infections resulted in resistance, and as low as 1.3% when 10% of breakthrough infections resulted in resistance in both our prioritized and non-prioritized scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Even in settings with low test rates and treatment retention, the use of PrEP can still be a useful strategy in averting infections. Our model has shown that PrEP is a cost-effective strategy for reducing HIV incidence, even when adherence is suboptimal and prioritization is imperfect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3601101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36011012013-03-22 Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study Nichols, Brooke E. Boucher, Charles A. B. van Dijk, Janneke H. Thuma, Phil E. Nouwen, Jan L. Baltussen, Rob van de Wijgert, Janneke Sloot, Peter M. A. van de Vijver, David A. M. C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir and emtricitabine effectively prevents new HIV infections. The optimal scenario for implementing PrEP where most infections are averted at the lowest cost is unknown. We determined the impact of different PrEP strategies on averting new infections, prevalence, drug resistance and cost-effectiveness in Macha, a rural setting in Zambia. METHODS: A deterministic mathematical model of HIV transmission was constructed using data from the Macha epidemic (antenatal prevalence 7.7%). Antiretroviral therapy is started at CD4<350 cells/mm(3). We compared the number of infections averted, cost-effectiveness, and potential emergence of drug resistance of two ends of the prioritization spectrum: prioritizing PrEP to half of the most sexually active individuals (5–15% of the total population), versus randomly putting 40–60% of the total population on PrEP. RESULTS: Prioritizing PrEP to individuals with the highest sexual activity resulted in more infections averted than a non-prioritized strategy over ten years (31% and 23% reduction in new infections respectively), and also a lower HIV prevalence after ten years (5.7%, 6.4% respectively). The strategy was very cost-effective at $323 per quality adjusted life year gained and appeared to be both less costly and more effective than the non-prioritized strategy. The prevalence of drug resistance due to PrEP was as high as 11.6% when all assumed breakthrough infections resulted in resistance, and as low as 1.3% when 10% of breakthrough infections resulted in resistance in both our prioritized and non-prioritized scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Even in settings with low test rates and treatment retention, the use of PrEP can still be a useful strategy in averting infections. Our model has shown that PrEP is a cost-effective strategy for reducing HIV incidence, even when adherence is suboptimal and prioritization is imperfect. Public Library of Science 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3601101/ /pubmed/23527217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059549 Text en © 2013 Nichols et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nichols, Brooke E. Boucher, Charles A. B. van Dijk, Janneke H. Thuma, Phil E. Nouwen, Jan L. Baltussen, Rob van de Wijgert, Janneke Sloot, Peter M. A. van de Vijver, David A. M. C. Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study |
title | Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Preventing HIV-1 Infections in Rural Zambia: A Modeling Study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) in preventing hiv-1 infections in rural zambia: a modeling study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nicholsbrookee costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT bouchercharlesab costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT vandijkjannekeh costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT thumaphile costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT nouwenjanl costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT baltussenrob costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT vandewijgertjanneke costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT slootpeterma costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy AT vandevijverdavidamc costeffectivenessofpreexposureprophylaxisprepinpreventinghiv1infectionsinruralzambiaamodelingstudy |