Cargando…

Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact

OBJECTIVE: We examined the extent to which differences in hospital-level cesarean delivery rates in Massachusetts were attributable to hospital-level, rather than maternal, characteristics. METHODS: Birth certificate and maternal in-patient hospital discharge records for 2004–06 in Massachusetts wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cáceres, Isabel A., Arcaya, Mariana, Declercq, Eugene, Belanoff, Candice M., Janakiraman, Vanitha, Cohen, Bruce, Ecker, Jeffrey, Smith, Lauren A., Subramanian, S. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057817
_version_ 1782475721582575616
author Cáceres, Isabel A.
Arcaya, Mariana
Declercq, Eugene
Belanoff, Candice M.
Janakiraman, Vanitha
Cohen, Bruce
Ecker, Jeffrey
Smith, Lauren A.
Subramanian, S. V.
author_facet Cáceres, Isabel A.
Arcaya, Mariana
Declercq, Eugene
Belanoff, Candice M.
Janakiraman, Vanitha
Cohen, Bruce
Ecker, Jeffrey
Smith, Lauren A.
Subramanian, S. V.
author_sort Cáceres, Isabel A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We examined the extent to which differences in hospital-level cesarean delivery rates in Massachusetts were attributable to hospital-level, rather than maternal, characteristics. METHODS: Birth certificate and maternal in-patient hospital discharge records for 2004–06 in Massachusetts were linked. The study population was nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex births (NTSV) (n = 80,371) in 49 hospitals. Covariates included mother's age, race/ethnicity, education, infant birth weight, gestational age, labor induction (yes/no), hospital shift at time of birth, and preexisting health conditions. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models to assess the likelihood of a cesarean delivery RESULTS: Overall, among women with NTSV births, 26.5% births were cesarean, with a range of 14% to 38.3% across hospitals. In unadjusted models, the between-hospital variance was 0.103 (SE 0.022); adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic and preexisting medical conditions did not reduce any hospital-level variation 0.108 (SE 0.023). CONCLUSION: Even after adjusting for both socio-demographic and clinical factors, the chance of a cesarean delivery for NTSV pregnancies varied according to hospital, suggesting the importance of hospital practices and culture in determining a hospital's cesarean rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3601117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36011172013-03-22 Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact Cáceres, Isabel A. Arcaya, Mariana Declercq, Eugene Belanoff, Candice M. Janakiraman, Vanitha Cohen, Bruce Ecker, Jeffrey Smith, Lauren A. Subramanian, S. V. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: We examined the extent to which differences in hospital-level cesarean delivery rates in Massachusetts were attributable to hospital-level, rather than maternal, characteristics. METHODS: Birth certificate and maternal in-patient hospital discharge records for 2004–06 in Massachusetts were linked. The study population was nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex births (NTSV) (n = 80,371) in 49 hospitals. Covariates included mother's age, race/ethnicity, education, infant birth weight, gestational age, labor induction (yes/no), hospital shift at time of birth, and preexisting health conditions. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models to assess the likelihood of a cesarean delivery RESULTS: Overall, among women with NTSV births, 26.5% births were cesarean, with a range of 14% to 38.3% across hospitals. In unadjusted models, the between-hospital variance was 0.103 (SE 0.022); adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic and preexisting medical conditions did not reduce any hospital-level variation 0.108 (SE 0.023). CONCLUSION: Even after adjusting for both socio-demographic and clinical factors, the chance of a cesarean delivery for NTSV pregnancies varied according to hospital, suggesting the importance of hospital practices and culture in determining a hospital's cesarean rate. Public Library of Science 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3601117/ /pubmed/23526952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057817 Text en © 2013 Cáceres et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cáceres, Isabel A.
Arcaya, Mariana
Declercq, Eugene
Belanoff, Candice M.
Janakiraman, Vanitha
Cohen, Bruce
Ecker, Jeffrey
Smith, Lauren A.
Subramanian, S. V.
Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact
title Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact
title_full Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact
title_fullStr Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact
title_full_unstemmed Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact
title_short Hospital Differences in Cesarean Deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004–2006: The Case against Case-Mix Artifact
title_sort hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in massachusetts (us) 2004–2006: the case against case-mix artifact
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3601117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057817
work_keys_str_mv AT caceresisabela hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT arcayamariana hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT declercqeugene hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT belanoffcandicem hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT janakiramanvanitha hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT cohenbruce hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT eckerjeffrey hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT smithlaurena hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact
AT subramaniansv hospitaldifferencesincesareandeliveriesinmassachusettsus20042006thecaseagainstcasemixartifact