Cargando…
Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Aim of the Study. To compare the effect of glossopharyngeal nerve block with topical anesthesia on the tolerance of patients to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods. We performed a clinical trial in one hundred patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Subjects were randomly assigne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/264509 |
_version_ | 1782263642449772544 |
---|---|
author | Ortega Ramírez, Moisés Linares Segovia, Benigno García Cuevas, Marco Antonio Sánchez Romero, Jorge Luis Botello Buenrostro, Illich Amador Licona, Norma Guízar Mendoza, Juan Manuel Guerrero Romero, Jesús Francisco Vázquez Zárate, Víctor Manuel |
author_facet | Ortega Ramírez, Moisés Linares Segovia, Benigno García Cuevas, Marco Antonio Sánchez Romero, Jorge Luis Botello Buenrostro, Illich Amador Licona, Norma Guízar Mendoza, Juan Manuel Guerrero Romero, Jesús Francisco Vázquez Zárate, Víctor Manuel |
author_sort | Ortega Ramírez, Moisés |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim of the Study. To compare the effect of glossopharyngeal nerve block with topical anesthesia on the tolerance of patients to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods. We performed a clinical trial in one hundred patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following two groups: (1) treatment with bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block (GFNB) and intravenous midazolam or (2) treatment with topical anesthetic (TASS) and intravenous midazolam. We evaluated sedation, tolerance to the procedure, hemodynamic stability, and adverse symptoms. Results. We studied 46 men and 54 women, from 17 to 78 years of age. The procedure was reported without discomfort in 48 patients (88%) in the GFNB group and 32 (64%) in the TAAS group; 6 patients (12%) in GFNB group and 18 (36%) in TAAS group reported the procedure as little discomfort (χ (2) = 3.95, P = 0.04). There was no difference in frequency of nausea (4% in both groups) and retching, 4% versus 8% for GFNB and TASS group, respectively (P = 0.55). Conclusions. The use of glossopharyngeal nerve block provides greater comfort and tolerance to the patient undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. It also reduces the need for sedation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3603156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36031562013-03-26 Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Ortega Ramírez, Moisés Linares Segovia, Benigno García Cuevas, Marco Antonio Sánchez Romero, Jorge Luis Botello Buenrostro, Illich Amador Licona, Norma Guízar Mendoza, Juan Manuel Guerrero Romero, Jesús Francisco Vázquez Zárate, Víctor Manuel Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Aim of the Study. To compare the effect of glossopharyngeal nerve block with topical anesthesia on the tolerance of patients to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods. We performed a clinical trial in one hundred patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following two groups: (1) treatment with bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve block (GFNB) and intravenous midazolam or (2) treatment with topical anesthetic (TASS) and intravenous midazolam. We evaluated sedation, tolerance to the procedure, hemodynamic stability, and adverse symptoms. Results. We studied 46 men and 54 women, from 17 to 78 years of age. The procedure was reported without discomfort in 48 patients (88%) in the GFNB group and 32 (64%) in the TAAS group; 6 patients (12%) in GFNB group and 18 (36%) in TAAS group reported the procedure as little discomfort (χ (2) = 3.95, P = 0.04). There was no difference in frequency of nausea (4% in both groups) and retching, 4% versus 8% for GFNB and TASS group, respectively (P = 0.55). Conclusions. The use of glossopharyngeal nerve block provides greater comfort and tolerance to the patient undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. It also reduces the need for sedation. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3603156/ /pubmed/23533386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/264509 Text en Copyright © 2013 Moisés Ortega Ramírez et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Ortega Ramírez, Moisés Linares Segovia, Benigno García Cuevas, Marco Antonio Sánchez Romero, Jorge Luis Botello Buenrostro, Illich Amador Licona, Norma Guízar Mendoza, Juan Manuel Guerrero Romero, Jesús Francisco Vázquez Zárate, Víctor Manuel Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
title | Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
title_full | Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
title_fullStr | Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
title_short | Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block versus Lidocaine Spray to Improve Tolerance in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy |
title_sort | glossopharyngeal nerve block versus lidocaine spray to improve tolerance in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/264509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ortegaramirezmoises glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT linaressegoviabenigno glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT garciacuevasmarcoantonio glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT sanchezromerojorgeluis glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT botellobuenrostroillich glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT amadorliconanorma glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT guizarmendozajuanmanuel glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT guerreroromerojesusfrancisco glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy AT vazquezzaratevictormanuel glossopharyngealnerveblockversuslidocainespraytoimprovetoleranceinuppergastrointestinalendoscopy |