Cargando…
Outcome mapping for health system integration
Health systems around the world are implementing integrated care strategies to improve quality, reduce or maintain costs, and improve the patient experience. Yet few practical tools exist to aid leaders and managers in building the prerequisites to integrated care, namely a shared vision, clear role...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526058 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S41575 |
_version_ | 1782263671962992640 |
---|---|
author | Tsasis, Peter Evans, Jenna M Forrest, David Jones, Richard Keith |
author_facet | Tsasis, Peter Evans, Jenna M Forrest, David Jones, Richard Keith |
author_sort | Tsasis, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Health systems around the world are implementing integrated care strategies to improve quality, reduce or maintain costs, and improve the patient experience. Yet few practical tools exist to aid leaders and managers in building the prerequisites to integrated care, namely a shared vision, clear roles and responsibilities, and a common understanding of how the vision will be realized. Outcome mapping may facilitate stakeholder alignment on the vision, roles, and processes of integrated care delivery via participative and focused dialogue among diverse stakeholders on desired outcomes and enabling actions. In this paper, we describe an outcome-mapping exercise we conducted at a Local Health Integration Network in Ontario, Canada, using consensus development conferences. Our preliminary findings suggest that outcome mapping may help stakeholders make sense of a complex system and foster collaborative capital, a resource that can support information sharing, trust, and coordinated change toward integration across organizational and professional boundaries. Drawing from the theoretical perspectives of complex adaptive systems and collaborative capital, we also outline recommendations for future outcome-mapping exercises. In particular, we emphasize the potential for outcome mapping to be used as a tool not only for identifying and linking strategic outcomes and actions, but also for studying the boundaries, gaps, and ties that characterize social networks across the continuum of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3603332 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36033322013-03-22 Outcome mapping for health system integration Tsasis, Peter Evans, Jenna M Forrest, David Jones, Richard Keith J Multidiscip Healthc Original Research Health systems around the world are implementing integrated care strategies to improve quality, reduce or maintain costs, and improve the patient experience. Yet few practical tools exist to aid leaders and managers in building the prerequisites to integrated care, namely a shared vision, clear roles and responsibilities, and a common understanding of how the vision will be realized. Outcome mapping may facilitate stakeholder alignment on the vision, roles, and processes of integrated care delivery via participative and focused dialogue among diverse stakeholders on desired outcomes and enabling actions. In this paper, we describe an outcome-mapping exercise we conducted at a Local Health Integration Network in Ontario, Canada, using consensus development conferences. Our preliminary findings suggest that outcome mapping may help stakeholders make sense of a complex system and foster collaborative capital, a resource that can support information sharing, trust, and coordinated change toward integration across organizational and professional boundaries. Drawing from the theoretical perspectives of complex adaptive systems and collaborative capital, we also outline recommendations for future outcome-mapping exercises. In particular, we emphasize the potential for outcome mapping to be used as a tool not only for identifying and linking strategic outcomes and actions, but also for studying the boundaries, gaps, and ties that characterize social networks across the continuum of care. Dove Medical Press 2013-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3603332/ /pubmed/23526058 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S41575 Text en © 2013 Tsasis et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tsasis, Peter Evans, Jenna M Forrest, David Jones, Richard Keith Outcome mapping for health system integration |
title | Outcome mapping for health system integration |
title_full | Outcome mapping for health system integration |
title_fullStr | Outcome mapping for health system integration |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcome mapping for health system integration |
title_short | Outcome mapping for health system integration |
title_sort | outcome mapping for health system integration |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603332/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526058 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S41575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsasispeter outcomemappingforhealthsystemintegration AT evansjennam outcomemappingforhealthsystemintegration AT forrestdavid outcomemappingforhealthsystemintegration AT jonesrichardkeith outcomemappingforhealthsystemintegration |