Cargando…

Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways

Breast cancers today are of predominantly T1 (0.1 ≥ 2.0 cm) or T2 (>2 ≤ 5 cm) categories due to early diagnosis. Molecular profiling using microarrays has led to the notion of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease both clinically and molecularly. Given the prognostic power and clinical use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riis, Margit L. H., Zhao, Xi, Kaveh, Fateme, Vollan, Hilde S., Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn, Solvang, Hiroko K., Lüders, Torben, Bukholm, Ida R. K., Kristensen, Vessela N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/924971
_version_ 1782263674011910144
author Riis, Margit L. H.
Zhao, Xi
Kaveh, Fateme
Vollan, Hilde S.
Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn
Solvang, Hiroko K.
Lüders, Torben
Bukholm, Ida R. K.
Kristensen, Vessela N.
author_facet Riis, Margit L. H.
Zhao, Xi
Kaveh, Fateme
Vollan, Hilde S.
Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn
Solvang, Hiroko K.
Lüders, Torben
Bukholm, Ida R. K.
Kristensen, Vessela N.
author_sort Riis, Margit L. H.
collection PubMed
description Breast cancers today are of predominantly T1 (0.1 ≥ 2.0 cm) or T2 (>2 ≤ 5 cm) categories due to early diagnosis. Molecular profiling using microarrays has led to the notion of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease both clinically and molecularly. Given the prognostic power and clinical use of tumor size, the purpose of this study was to search for molecular signatures characterizing clinical T1 and T2. In total 46 samples were included in the discovery dataset. After adjusting for hormone receptor status, lymph node status, grade, and tumor subclass 441 genes were differently expressed between T1 and T2 tumors. Focal adhesion and extracellular matrix receptor interaction were upregulated in the smaller tumors while p38MAPK signaling and immune-related pathways were more dominant in the larger tumors. The T-size signature was then tested on a validation set of 947 breast tumor samples. Using the T-size expression signatures instead of tumor size leads to a significant difference in risk for distant metastases (P < 0.001). If further confirmed, this molecular signature can be used to select patients with tumor category T1 who may need more aggressive treatment and patients with tumor category T2 who may have less benefit from it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3603375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36033752013-03-26 Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways Riis, Margit L. H. Zhao, Xi Kaveh, Fateme Vollan, Hilde S. Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn Solvang, Hiroko K. Lüders, Torben Bukholm, Ida R. K. Kristensen, Vessela N. ISRN Oncol Research Article Breast cancers today are of predominantly T1 (0.1 ≥ 2.0 cm) or T2 (>2 ≤ 5 cm) categories due to early diagnosis. Molecular profiling using microarrays has led to the notion of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease both clinically and molecularly. Given the prognostic power and clinical use of tumor size, the purpose of this study was to search for molecular signatures characterizing clinical T1 and T2. In total 46 samples were included in the discovery dataset. After adjusting for hormone receptor status, lymph node status, grade, and tumor subclass 441 genes were differently expressed between T1 and T2 tumors. Focal adhesion and extracellular matrix receptor interaction were upregulated in the smaller tumors while p38MAPK signaling and immune-related pathways were more dominant in the larger tumors. The T-size signature was then tested on a validation set of 947 breast tumor samples. Using the T-size expression signatures instead of tumor size leads to a significant difference in risk for distant metastases (P < 0.001). If further confirmed, this molecular signature can be used to select patients with tumor category T1 who may need more aggressive treatment and patients with tumor category T2 who may have less benefit from it. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3603375/ /pubmed/23533813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/924971 Text en Copyright © 2013 Margit L. H. Riis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Riis, Margit L. H.
Zhao, Xi
Kaveh, Fateme
Vollan, Hilde S.
Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn
Solvang, Hiroko K.
Lüders, Torben
Bukholm, Ida R. K.
Kristensen, Vessela N.
Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
title Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
title_full Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
title_fullStr Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
title_full_unstemmed Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
title_short Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
title_sort gene expression profile analysis of t1 and t2 breast cancer reveals different activation pathways
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/924971
work_keys_str_mv AT riismargitlh geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT zhaoxi geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT kavehfateme geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT vollanhildes geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT nesbakkenannejorunn geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT solvanghirokok geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT luderstorben geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT bukholmidark geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways
AT kristensenvesselan geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways