Cargando…
Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways
Breast cancers today are of predominantly T1 (0.1 ≥ 2.0 cm) or T2 (>2 ≤ 5 cm) categories due to early diagnosis. Molecular profiling using microarrays has led to the notion of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease both clinically and molecularly. Given the prognostic power and clinical use of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/924971 |
_version_ | 1782263674011910144 |
---|---|
author | Riis, Margit L. H. Zhao, Xi Kaveh, Fateme Vollan, Hilde S. Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn Solvang, Hiroko K. Lüders, Torben Bukholm, Ida R. K. Kristensen, Vessela N. |
author_facet | Riis, Margit L. H. Zhao, Xi Kaveh, Fateme Vollan, Hilde S. Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn Solvang, Hiroko K. Lüders, Torben Bukholm, Ida R. K. Kristensen, Vessela N. |
author_sort | Riis, Margit L. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast cancers today are of predominantly T1 (0.1 ≥ 2.0 cm) or T2 (>2 ≤ 5 cm) categories due to early diagnosis. Molecular profiling using microarrays has led to the notion of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease both clinically and molecularly. Given the prognostic power and clinical use of tumor size, the purpose of this study was to search for molecular signatures characterizing clinical T1 and T2. In total 46 samples were included in the discovery dataset. After adjusting for hormone receptor status, lymph node status, grade, and tumor subclass 441 genes were differently expressed between T1 and T2 tumors. Focal adhesion and extracellular matrix receptor interaction were upregulated in the smaller tumors while p38MAPK signaling and immune-related pathways were more dominant in the larger tumors. The T-size signature was then tested on a validation set of 947 breast tumor samples. Using the T-size expression signatures instead of tumor size leads to a significant difference in risk for distant metastases (P < 0.001). If further confirmed, this molecular signature can be used to select patients with tumor category T1 who may need more aggressive treatment and patients with tumor category T2 who may have less benefit from it. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3603375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36033752013-03-26 Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways Riis, Margit L. H. Zhao, Xi Kaveh, Fateme Vollan, Hilde S. Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn Solvang, Hiroko K. Lüders, Torben Bukholm, Ida R. K. Kristensen, Vessela N. ISRN Oncol Research Article Breast cancers today are of predominantly T1 (0.1 ≥ 2.0 cm) or T2 (>2 ≤ 5 cm) categories due to early diagnosis. Molecular profiling using microarrays has led to the notion of breast cancer as a heterogeneous disease both clinically and molecularly. Given the prognostic power and clinical use of tumor size, the purpose of this study was to search for molecular signatures characterizing clinical T1 and T2. In total 46 samples were included in the discovery dataset. After adjusting for hormone receptor status, lymph node status, grade, and tumor subclass 441 genes were differently expressed between T1 and T2 tumors. Focal adhesion and extracellular matrix receptor interaction were upregulated in the smaller tumors while p38MAPK signaling and immune-related pathways were more dominant in the larger tumors. The T-size signature was then tested on a validation set of 947 breast tumor samples. Using the T-size expression signatures instead of tumor size leads to a significant difference in risk for distant metastases (P < 0.001). If further confirmed, this molecular signature can be used to select patients with tumor category T1 who may need more aggressive treatment and patients with tumor category T2 who may have less benefit from it. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3603375/ /pubmed/23533813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/924971 Text en Copyright © 2013 Margit L. H. Riis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Riis, Margit L. H. Zhao, Xi Kaveh, Fateme Vollan, Hilde S. Nesbakken, Anne-Jorunn Solvang, Hiroko K. Lüders, Torben Bukholm, Ida R. K. Kristensen, Vessela N. Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways |
title | Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways |
title_full | Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways |
title_fullStr | Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways |
title_full_unstemmed | Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways |
title_short | Gene Expression Profile Analysis of T1 and T2 Breast Cancer Reveals Different Activation Pathways |
title_sort | gene expression profile analysis of t1 and t2 breast cancer reveals different activation pathways |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3603375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23533813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/924971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riismargitlh geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT zhaoxi geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT kavehfateme geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT vollanhildes geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT nesbakkenannejorunn geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT solvanghirokok geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT luderstorben geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT bukholmidark geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways AT kristensenvesselan geneexpressionprofileanalysisoft1andt2breastcancerrevealsdifferentactivationpathways |