Cargando…

Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality

PURPOSE: This study was performed to suggest reference line-pair values of panoramic images with clinically desirable qualities using an arch-form phantom stand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The line-pair test phantom was chosen. A real skull model was selected for setting the arch-form model of the phant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Da-Hye, Choi, Bo-Ram, Choi, Jin-Woo, Huh, Kyung-Hoe, Yi, Won-Jin, Heo, Min-Suk, Choi, Soon-Chul, Lee, Sam-Sun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3604374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526047
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.7
_version_ 1782263757546717184
author Choi, Da-Hye
Choi, Bo-Ram
Choi, Jin-Woo
Huh, Kyung-Hoe
Yi, Won-Jin
Heo, Min-Suk
Choi, Soon-Chul
Lee, Sam-Sun
author_facet Choi, Da-Hye
Choi, Bo-Ram
Choi, Jin-Woo
Huh, Kyung-Hoe
Yi, Won-Jin
Heo, Min-Suk
Choi, Soon-Chul
Lee, Sam-Sun
author_sort Choi, Da-Hye
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study was performed to suggest reference line-pair values of panoramic images with clinically desirable qualities using an arch-form phantom stand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The line-pair test phantom was chosen. A real skull model was selected for setting the arch-form model of the phantom stand. The phantom stand had slits in four regions (incisor, premolar, molar, TMJ). Four raw images of the test phantom in each region and one raw image of the real skull were converted into 50 test phantom images and 50 skull phantom images with various line-pair values. 50 post-processed real skull phantom images were divided into 4 groups and were randomly submitted to 14 evaluators. Image quality was graded on a 4 point scale (1. good, 2. normal, 3. poor but interpretable, and 4. not interpretable). The reference line pair was determined as the first line-pair value scored less than 2 points. RESULT: The mean scores tended to decrease as the line-pair values increased. The reference line-pair values were 3.19 LP/mm in the incisor, 2.32 LP/mm in the premolar and TMJ, and 1.88 LP/mm in the molar region. CONCLUSION: Image quality evaluation methods and criteria should be able to assess various regions considering the characteristics of panoramic systems. This study suggested overall and regional reference line-pair values and established a set of standard values for them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3604374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36043742013-03-22 Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality Choi, Da-Hye Choi, Bo-Ram Choi, Jin-Woo Huh, Kyung-Hoe Yi, Won-Jin Heo, Min-Suk Choi, Soon-Chul Lee, Sam-Sun Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: This study was performed to suggest reference line-pair values of panoramic images with clinically desirable qualities using an arch-form phantom stand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The line-pair test phantom was chosen. A real skull model was selected for setting the arch-form model of the phantom stand. The phantom stand had slits in four regions (incisor, premolar, molar, TMJ). Four raw images of the test phantom in each region and one raw image of the real skull were converted into 50 test phantom images and 50 skull phantom images with various line-pair values. 50 post-processed real skull phantom images were divided into 4 groups and were randomly submitted to 14 evaluators. Image quality was graded on a 4 point scale (1. good, 2. normal, 3. poor but interpretable, and 4. not interpretable). The reference line pair was determined as the first line-pair value scored less than 2 points. RESULT: The mean scores tended to decrease as the line-pair values increased. The reference line-pair values were 3.19 LP/mm in the incisor, 2.32 LP/mm in the premolar and TMJ, and 1.88 LP/mm in the molar region. CONCLUSION: Image quality evaluation methods and criteria should be able to assess various regions considering the characteristics of panoramic systems. This study suggested overall and regional reference line-pair values and established a set of standard values for them. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2013-03 2013-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3604374/ /pubmed/23526047 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.7 Text en Copyright © 2013 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Da-Hye
Choi, Bo-Ram
Choi, Jin-Woo
Huh, Kyung-Hoe
Yi, Won-Jin
Heo, Min-Suk
Choi, Soon-Chul
Lee, Sam-Sun
Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
title Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
title_full Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
title_fullStr Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
title_full_unstemmed Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
title_short Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
title_sort reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3604374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23526047
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2013.43.1.7
work_keys_str_mv AT choidahye referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT choiboram referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT choijinwoo referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT huhkyunghoe referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT yiwonjin referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT heominsuk referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT choisoonchul referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality
AT leesamsun referencelinepairvaluesofpanoramicradiographsusinganarchformphantomstandtoassessclinicalimagequality