Cargando…

When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing

Geobacter sulfurreducens strain KN400 was recovered in previous studies in which a culture of the DL1 strain of G. sulfurreducens served as the inoculum in investigations of microbial current production at low anode potentials (−400 mV versus Ag/AgCl). Differences in the genome sequences of KN400 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Pravin Malla, Nevin, Kelly P., Shrestha, Minita, Lovley, Derek R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Microbiology 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3604776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23481604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00591-12
_version_ 1782263785275260928
author Shrestha, Pravin Malla
Nevin, Kelly P.
Shrestha, Minita
Lovley, Derek R.
author_facet Shrestha, Pravin Malla
Nevin, Kelly P.
Shrestha, Minita
Lovley, Derek R.
author_sort Shrestha, Pravin Malla
collection PubMed
description Geobacter sulfurreducens strain KN400 was recovered in previous studies in which a culture of the DL1 strain of G. sulfurreducens served as the inoculum in investigations of microbial current production at low anode potentials (−400 mV versus Ag/AgCl). Differences in the genome sequences of KN400 and DL1 were too great to have arisen from adaptive evolution during growth on the anode. Previous deep sequencing (80-fold coverage) of the DL1 culture failed to detect sequences specific to KN400, suggesting that KN400 was an external contaminant inadvertently introduced into the anode culturing system. In order to evaluate this further, a portion of the gene for OmcS, a c-type cytochrome that both KN400 and DL1 possess, was amplified from the DL1 culture. HiSeq-2000 Illumina sequencing of the PCR product detected the KN400 sequence, which differs from the DL1 sequence at 14 bp, at a frequency of ca. 1 in 10(5) copies of the DL1 sequence. A similar low frequency of KN400 was detected with quantitative PCR of a KN400-specific gene. KN400 persisted at this frequency after intensive restreaking of isolated colonies from the DL1 culture. However, a culture in which KN400 could no longer be detected was obtained by serial dilution to extinction in liquid medium. The KN400-free culture could not grow on an anode poised at −400 mV. Thus, KN400 cryptically persisted in the culture dominated by DL1 for more than a decade, undetected by even deep whole-genome sequencing, and was only fortuitously uncovered by the unnatural selection pressure of growth on a low-potential electrode.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3604776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Society of Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36047762013-03-21 When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing Shrestha, Pravin Malla Nevin, Kelly P. Shrestha, Minita Lovley, Derek R. mBio Observation Geobacter sulfurreducens strain KN400 was recovered in previous studies in which a culture of the DL1 strain of G. sulfurreducens served as the inoculum in investigations of microbial current production at low anode potentials (−400 mV versus Ag/AgCl). Differences in the genome sequences of KN400 and DL1 were too great to have arisen from adaptive evolution during growth on the anode. Previous deep sequencing (80-fold coverage) of the DL1 culture failed to detect sequences specific to KN400, suggesting that KN400 was an external contaminant inadvertently introduced into the anode culturing system. In order to evaluate this further, a portion of the gene for OmcS, a c-type cytochrome that both KN400 and DL1 possess, was amplified from the DL1 culture. HiSeq-2000 Illumina sequencing of the PCR product detected the KN400 sequence, which differs from the DL1 sequence at 14 bp, at a frequency of ca. 1 in 10(5) copies of the DL1 sequence. A similar low frequency of KN400 was detected with quantitative PCR of a KN400-specific gene. KN400 persisted at this frequency after intensive restreaking of isolated colonies from the DL1 culture. However, a culture in which KN400 could no longer be detected was obtained by serial dilution to extinction in liquid medium. The KN400-free culture could not grow on an anode poised at −400 mV. Thus, KN400 cryptically persisted in the culture dominated by DL1 for more than a decade, undetected by even deep whole-genome sequencing, and was only fortuitously uncovered by the unnatural selection pressure of growth on a low-potential electrode. American Society of Microbiology 2013-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3604776/ /pubmed/23481604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00591-12 Text en Copyright © 2013 Shrestha et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) license, which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Observation
Shrestha, Pravin Malla
Nevin, Kelly P.
Shrestha, Minita
Lovley, Derek R.
When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing
title When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing
title_full When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing
title_fullStr When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing
title_full_unstemmed When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing
title_short When Is a Microbial Culture “Pure”? Persistent Cryptic Contaminant Escapes Detection Even with Deep Genome Sequencing
title_sort when is a microbial culture “pure”? persistent cryptic contaminant escapes detection even with deep genome sequencing
topic Observation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3604776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23481604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00591-12
work_keys_str_mv AT shresthapravinmalla whenisamicrobialculturepurepersistentcrypticcontaminantescapesdetectionevenwithdeepgenomesequencing
AT nevinkellyp whenisamicrobialculturepurepersistentcrypticcontaminantescapesdetectionevenwithdeepgenomesequencing
AT shresthaminita whenisamicrobialculturepurepersistentcrypticcontaminantescapesdetectionevenwithdeepgenomesequencing
AT lovleyderekr whenisamicrobialculturepurepersistentcrypticcontaminantescapesdetectionevenwithdeepgenomesequencing