Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of dried activated sludge (DAS) and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica (DAS & RHS) for removal of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S). Two laboratory-scale filter columns (packed one litter) were operated. Both systems were operated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehdinia, Seyed Mahmoud, Latif, Puziah Abdul, Taghipour, Hassan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-22
_version_ 1782263827981664256
author Mehdinia, Seyed Mahmoud
Latif, Puziah Abdul
Taghipour, Hassan
author_facet Mehdinia, Seyed Mahmoud
Latif, Puziah Abdul
Taghipour, Hassan
author_sort Mehdinia, Seyed Mahmoud
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of dried activated sludge (DAS) and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica (DAS & RHS) for removal of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S). Two laboratory-scale filter columns (packed one litter) were operated. Both systems were operated under different conditions of two parameters, namely different inlet gas concentrations and different inlet flow rates. The DAS & RHS packed filter showed more than 99.96% removal efficiency (RE) with empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 45 to 90 s and 300 mg/L inlet concentration of H(2)S. However, the RE decreased to 96.87% with the EBRT of 30 s. In the same condition, the DAS packed filter showed 99.37% RE. Nonetheless, the RE was shown to have dropped to 82.09% with the EBRT of 30 s. The maximum elimination capacity (EC) was obtained in the DAS & RHS packed filter up to 52.32 g/m(3)h, with the RE of 96.87% and H(2)S mass loading rate of 54 g/m(3)h. The maximum EC in the DAS packed filter was obtained up to 44.33 g/m(3)h with the RE of 82.09% and the H(2)S mass loading rate of 54 g/m(3)h. After 53 days of operating time and 54 g/m(3)h of loading rates, the maximum pressure drop reached to 3.0 and 8.0 (mm H(2)O) for the DAS & RHS packed and DAS packed filters, respectively. Based on the findings of this study, the DAS & RHS could be considered as a more suitable packing material to remove H(2)S.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3605136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36051362013-03-26 A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide Mehdinia, Seyed Mahmoud Latif, Puziah Abdul Taghipour, Hassan Iranian J Environ Health Sci Eng Research Article The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of dried activated sludge (DAS) and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica (DAS & RHS) for removal of hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S). Two laboratory-scale filter columns (packed one litter) were operated. Both systems were operated under different conditions of two parameters, namely different inlet gas concentrations and different inlet flow rates. The DAS & RHS packed filter showed more than 99.96% removal efficiency (RE) with empty bed residence time (EBRT) of 45 to 90 s and 300 mg/L inlet concentration of H(2)S. However, the RE decreased to 96.87% with the EBRT of 30 s. In the same condition, the DAS packed filter showed 99.37% RE. Nonetheless, the RE was shown to have dropped to 82.09% with the EBRT of 30 s. The maximum elimination capacity (EC) was obtained in the DAS & RHS packed filter up to 52.32 g/m(3)h, with the RE of 96.87% and H(2)S mass loading rate of 54 g/m(3)h. The maximum EC in the DAS packed filter was obtained up to 44.33 g/m(3)h with the RE of 82.09% and the H(2)S mass loading rate of 54 g/m(3)h. After 53 days of operating time and 54 g/m(3)h of loading rates, the maximum pressure drop reached to 3.0 and 8.0 (mm H(2)O) for the DAS & RHS packed and DAS packed filters, respectively. Based on the findings of this study, the DAS & RHS could be considered as a more suitable packing material to remove H(2)S. BioMed Central 2013-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3605136/ /pubmed/23497048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-22 Text en Copyright ©2013 Mehdinia et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehdinia, Seyed Mahmoud
Latif, Puziah Abdul
Taghipour, Hassan
A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
title A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
title_full A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
title_short A comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
title_sort comparative evaluation of dried activated sludge and mixed dried activated sludge with rice husk silica to remove hydrogen sulfide
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23497048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1735-2746-10-22
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdiniaseyedmahmoud acomparativeevaluationofdriedactivatedsludgeandmixeddriedactivatedsludgewithricehusksilicatoremovehydrogensulfide
AT latifpuziahabdul acomparativeevaluationofdriedactivatedsludgeandmixeddriedactivatedsludgewithricehusksilicatoremovehydrogensulfide
AT taghipourhassan acomparativeevaluationofdriedactivatedsludgeandmixeddriedactivatedsludgewithricehusksilicatoremovehydrogensulfide
AT mehdiniaseyedmahmoud comparativeevaluationofdriedactivatedsludgeandmixeddriedactivatedsludgewithricehusksilicatoremovehydrogensulfide
AT latifpuziahabdul comparativeevaluationofdriedactivatedsludgeandmixeddriedactivatedsludgewithricehusksilicatoremovehydrogensulfide
AT taghipourhassan comparativeevaluationofdriedactivatedsludgeandmixeddriedactivatedsludgewithricehusksilicatoremovehydrogensulfide