Cargando…

Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Differentiates between Blood Depositions and Calcifications in Patients with Glioblastoma

OBJECTIVES: The application of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in brain tumor imaging is mainly used to assess tumor-related “susceptibility based signals” (SBS). The origin of SBS in glioblastoma is still unknown, potentially representing calcifications or blood depositions. Reliable differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deistung, Andreas, Schweser, Ferdinand, Wiestler, Benedikt, Abello, Mario, Roethke, Matthias, Sahm, Felix, Wick, Wolfgang, Nagel, Armin Michael, Heiland, Sabine, Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Bendszus, Martin, Reichenbach, Jürgen Rainer, Radbruch, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057924
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The application of susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) in brain tumor imaging is mainly used to assess tumor-related “susceptibility based signals” (SBS). The origin of SBS in glioblastoma is still unknown, potentially representing calcifications or blood depositions. Reliable differentiation between both entities may be important to evaluate treatment response and to identify glioblastoma with oligodendroglial components that are supposed to present calcifications. Since calcifications and blood deposits are difficult to differentiate using conventional MRI, we investigated whether a new post-processing approach, quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), is able to distinguish between both entities reliably. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SWI, FLAIR, and T1-w images were acquired from 46 patients with glioblastoma (14 newly diagnosed, 24 treated with radiochemotherapy, 8 treated with radiochemotherapy and additional anti-angiogenic medication). Susceptibility maps were calculated from SWI data. All glioblastoma were evaluated for the appearance of hypointense or hyperintense correlates of SBS on the susceptibility maps. RESULTS: 43 of 46 glioblastoma presented only hyperintense intratumoral SBS on susceptibility maps, indicating blood deposits. Additional hypointense correlates of tumor-related SBS on susceptibility maps, indicating calcification, were identified in 2 patients being treated with radiochemotherapy and in one patient being treated with additional anti-angiogenic medication. Histopathologic reports revealed an oligodendroglial component in one patient that presented calcifications on susceptibility maps. CONCLUSIONS: QSM provides a quantitative, local MRI contrast, which reliably differentiates between blood deposits and calcifications. Thus, quantitative susceptibility mapping appears promising to identify rare variants of glioblastoma with oligodendroglial components non-invasively and may allow monitoring the role of calcification in the context of different therapy regimes.