Cargando…

Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?

Even as the neuro-psychoanalytic field has matured, from a naturalist point of view, the epistemological status of Freudian interpretations still remains problematic at a naturalist point of view. As a result of the resurgence of hermeneutics, the claim has been made that psychoanalysis is an extens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Arminjon, Mathieu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23525879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00135
_version_ 1782263903446630400
author Arminjon, Mathieu
author_facet Arminjon, Mathieu
author_sort Arminjon, Mathieu
collection PubMed
description Even as the neuro-psychoanalytic field has matured, from a naturalist point of view, the epistemological status of Freudian interpretations still remains problematic at a naturalist point of view. As a result of the resurgence of hermeneutics, the claim has been made that psychoanalysis is an extension of folk psychology. For these “extensionists,” asking psychoanalysis to prove its interpretations would be as absurd as demanding the proofs of the scientific accuracy of folk psychology. I propose to show how Dennett’s theory of the intentional stance allows us to defend an extensionist position while sparing us certain hermeneutic difficulties. In conclusion, I will consider how Shevrin et al. (1996) experiments could turn extensionist conceptual considerations into experimentally testable issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3605520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36055202013-03-22 Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology? Arminjon, Mathieu Front Psychol Psychology Even as the neuro-psychoanalytic field has matured, from a naturalist point of view, the epistemological status of Freudian interpretations still remains problematic at a naturalist point of view. As a result of the resurgence of hermeneutics, the claim has been made that psychoanalysis is an extension of folk psychology. For these “extensionists,” asking psychoanalysis to prove its interpretations would be as absurd as demanding the proofs of the scientific accuracy of folk psychology. I propose to show how Dennett’s theory of the intentional stance allows us to defend an extensionist position while sparing us certain hermeneutic difficulties. In conclusion, I will consider how Shevrin et al. (1996) experiments could turn extensionist conceptual considerations into experimentally testable issues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3605520/ /pubmed/23525879 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00135 Text en Copyright © 2013 Arminjon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
Arminjon, Mathieu
Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?
title Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?
title_full Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?
title_fullStr Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?
title_full_unstemmed Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?
title_short Is Psychoanalysis a Folk Psychology?
title_sort is psychoanalysis a folk psychology?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3605520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23525879
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00135
work_keys_str_mv AT arminjonmathieu ispsychoanalysisafolkpsychology