Cargando…

Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity

The crystal structures and inhibitor complexes of two industrially important ω-aminotransferase enzymes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Chromobacterium violaceum have been determined in order to understand the differences in their substrate specificity. The two enzymes share 30% sequence identity an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayer, Christopher, Isupov, Michail N., Westlake, Aaron, Littlechild, Jennifer A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3606037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23519665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444912051670
_version_ 1782263942019547136
author Sayer, Christopher
Isupov, Michail N.
Westlake, Aaron
Littlechild, Jennifer A.
author_facet Sayer, Christopher
Isupov, Michail N.
Westlake, Aaron
Littlechild, Jennifer A.
author_sort Sayer, Christopher
collection PubMed
description The crystal structures and inhibitor complexes of two industrially important ω-aminotransferase enzymes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Chromobacterium violaceum have been determined in order to understand the differences in their substrate specificity. The two enzymes share 30% sequence identity and use the same amino acceptor, pyruvate; however, the Pseudomonas enzyme shows activity towards the amino donor β-alanine, whilst the Chromobacterium enzyme does not. Both enzymes show activity towards S-α-methylbenzylamine (MBA), with the Chromobacterium enzyme having a broader substrate range. The crystal structure of the P. aeruginosa enzyme has been solved in the holo form and with the inhibitor gabaculine bound. The C. violaceum enzyme has been solved in the apo and holo forms and with gabaculine bound. The structures of the holo forms of both enzymes are quite similar. There is little conformational difference observed between the inhibitor complex and the holoenzyme for the P. aeruginosa aminotransferase. In comparison, the crystal structure of the C. violaceum gabaculine complex shows significant structural rearrangements from the structures of both the apo and holo forms of the enzyme. It appears that the different rigidity of the protein scaffold contributes to the substrate specificity observed for the two ω-­aminotransferases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3606037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36060372013-05-10 Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity Sayer, Christopher Isupov, Michail N. Westlake, Aaron Littlechild, Jennifer A. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr Research Papers The crystal structures and inhibitor complexes of two industrially important ω-aminotransferase enzymes from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Chromobacterium violaceum have been determined in order to understand the differences in their substrate specificity. The two enzymes share 30% sequence identity and use the same amino acceptor, pyruvate; however, the Pseudomonas enzyme shows activity towards the amino donor β-alanine, whilst the Chromobacterium enzyme does not. Both enzymes show activity towards S-α-methylbenzylamine (MBA), with the Chromobacterium enzyme having a broader substrate range. The crystal structure of the P. aeruginosa enzyme has been solved in the holo form and with the inhibitor gabaculine bound. The C. violaceum enzyme has been solved in the apo and holo forms and with gabaculine bound. The structures of the holo forms of both enzymes are quite similar. There is little conformational difference observed between the inhibitor complex and the holoenzyme for the P. aeruginosa aminotransferase. In comparison, the crystal structure of the C. violaceum gabaculine complex shows significant structural rearrangements from the structures of both the apo and holo forms of the enzyme. It appears that the different rigidity of the protein scaffold contributes to the substrate specificity observed for the two ω-­aminotransferases. International Union of Crystallography 2013-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3606037/ /pubmed/23519665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444912051670 Text en © Sayer et al. 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Sayer, Christopher
Isupov, Michail N.
Westlake, Aaron
Littlechild, Jennifer A.
Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
title Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
title_full Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
title_fullStr Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
title_full_unstemmed Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
title_short Structural studies of Pseudomonas and Chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
title_sort structural studies of pseudomonas and chromobacterium ω-aminotransferases provide insights into their differing substrate specificity
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3606037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23519665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0907444912051670
work_keys_str_mv AT sayerchristopher structuralstudiesofpseudomonasandchromobacteriumōaminotransferasesprovideinsightsintotheirdifferingsubstratespecificity
AT isupovmichailn structuralstudiesofpseudomonasandchromobacteriumōaminotransferasesprovideinsightsintotheirdifferingsubstratespecificity
AT westlakeaaron structuralstudiesofpseudomonasandchromobacteriumōaminotransferasesprovideinsightsintotheirdifferingsubstratespecificity
AT littlechildjennifera structuralstudiesofpseudomonasandchromobacteriumōaminotransferasesprovideinsightsintotheirdifferingsubstratespecificity