Cargando…
Meta-narrative and realist reviews: guidance, rules, publication standards and quality appraisal
Recently, there has been an expansion of different forms of systematic review of research and the development of guidance and standards about particular types of review. These reviews can be best understood within a broad framework of the dimensions on which reviews differ, and how the review method...
Autor principal: | Gough, David |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3606472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23360691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-22 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A realistic appraisal of boron neutron capture therapy as a cancer treatment modality
por: Barth, Rolf F., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Protocol - realist and meta-narrative evidence synthesis: Evolving Standards (RAMESES)
por: Greenhalgh, Trisha, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews
por: Wong, Geoff, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
por: Wong, Geoff, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Can “realist” randomised controlled trials be genuinely realist?
por: Van Belle, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2016)