Cargando…

COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND: Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Respimat inhaler (CVT-R) was developed as an environmentally friendly alternative to ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (CVT-MDI), which uses a chlorofluorocarbon propellant. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate patient sati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferguson, Gary T, Ghafouri, Mo, Dai, Luyan, Dunn, Leonard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658479
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S38577
_version_ 1782264109634420736
author Ferguson, Gary T
Ghafouri, Mo
Dai, Luyan
Dunn, Leonard J
author_facet Ferguson, Gary T
Ghafouri, Mo
Dai, Luyan
Dunn, Leonard J
author_sort Ferguson, Gary T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Respimat inhaler (CVT-R) was developed as an environmentally friendly alternative to ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (CVT-MDI), which uses a chlorofluorocarbon propellant. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, device usage, and long-term safety of CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI, and to the simultaneous administration of ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA; I) and albuterol HFA (A) metered-dose inhalers as dual monotherapies (I + A). DESIGN: This is a 48-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study (n = 470) comparing CVT-R to CVT-MDI and to I + A. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were at least 40 years of age, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and current or exsmokers. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive: (1) CVT-R, one inhalation four times daily (QID); or (2) CVT-MDI, two inhalations QID; or (3) I + A two inhalations of each inhaler QID. MAIN MEASURES: Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) performance score (primary endpoint) and adverse events. KEY RESULTS: PASAPQ performance score was significantly higher (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, 9.6; and CVT-R versus I + A, 6.2; both P < 0.001) when using CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI or I + A at all visits starting from week 3, while CVT-MDI and I + A treatment groups were similar. Time to first COPD exacerbation was slightly longer in the CVT-R group compared to the other treatment groups, although it did not reach statistical significance (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.57; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.22). Rates of withdrawal and patient refusal to continue treatment were lower in CVT-R compared with CVT-MDI and I + A groups (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.09; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.005). The percentage of patients reporting adverse events and serious adverse events was similar across all three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: CVT-R is an effective, environmentally friendly inhaler that provides patients with a high level of user satisfaction and may positively impact clinical outcomes while having no adverse impacts on patients using the device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3607534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36075342013-05-08 COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study Ferguson, Gary T Ghafouri, Mo Dai, Luyan Dunn, Leonard J Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Ipratropium bromide/albuterol Respimat inhaler (CVT-R) was developed as an environmentally friendly alternative to ipratropium bromide/albuterol metered-dose inhaler (CVT-MDI), which uses a chlorofluorocarbon propellant. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction, device usage, and long-term safety of CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI, and to the simultaneous administration of ipratropium bromide hydrofluoroalkane (HFA; I) and albuterol HFA (A) metered-dose inhalers as dual monotherapies (I + A). DESIGN: This is a 48-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group study (n = 470) comparing CVT-R to CVT-MDI and to I + A. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were at least 40 years of age, diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and current or exsmokers. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive: (1) CVT-R, one inhalation four times daily (QID); or (2) CVT-MDI, two inhalations QID; or (3) I + A two inhalations of each inhaler QID. MAIN MEASURES: Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) performance score (primary endpoint) and adverse events. KEY RESULTS: PASAPQ performance score was significantly higher (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, 9.6; and CVT-R versus I + A, 6.2; both P < 0.001) when using CVT-R compared to CVT-MDI or I + A at all visits starting from week 3, while CVT-MDI and I + A treatment groups were similar. Time to first COPD exacerbation was slightly longer in the CVT-R group compared to the other treatment groups, although it did not reach statistical significance (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.57; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.22). Rates of withdrawal and patient refusal to continue treatment were lower in CVT-R compared with CVT-MDI and I + A groups (CVT-R versus CVT-MDI, P = 0.09; CVT-R versus I + A, P = 0.005). The percentage of patients reporting adverse events and serious adverse events was similar across all three treatment groups. CONCLUSION: CVT-R is an effective, environmentally friendly inhaler that provides patients with a high level of user satisfaction and may positively impact clinical outcomes while having no adverse impacts on patients using the device. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3607534/ /pubmed/23658479 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S38577 Text en © 2013 Ferguson et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ferguson, Gary T
Ghafouri, Mo
Dai, Luyan
Dunn, Leonard J
COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_full COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_fullStr COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_full_unstemmed COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_short COPD patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat: a randomized, controlled study
title_sort copd patient satisfaction with ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via respimat: a randomized, controlled study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23658479
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S38577
work_keys_str_mv AT fergusongaryt copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT ghafourimo copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dailuyan copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT dunnleonardj copdpatientsatisfactionwithipratropiumbromidealbuteroldeliveredviarespimatarandomizedcontrolledstudy