Cargando…

An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: A preliminary assessment was conducted of the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of (125)I seed implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent (125)I seed impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Lihong, Jiang, Yuliang, Wang, Junjie, Ran, Weiqiang, Yuan, Huishu, Liu, Chen, Qu, Ang, Yang, Ruijie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-60
_version_ 1782264163444195328
author Zhu, Lihong
Jiang, Yuliang
Wang, Junjie
Ran, Weiqiang
Yuan, Huishu
Liu, Chen
Qu, Ang
Yang, Ruijie
author_facet Zhu, Lihong
Jiang, Yuliang
Wang, Junjie
Ran, Weiqiang
Yuan, Huishu
Liu, Chen
Qu, Ang
Yang, Ruijie
author_sort Zhu, Lihong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A preliminary assessment was conducted of the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of (125)I seed implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent (125)I seed implantation under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. The actuarial D90 of (125)I seed implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months). RESULTS: The median local control was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2 to 37.8). The one- year, two-year and three-year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and 27.5%, respectively, whereas the one-year, two-year and three-year survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the median survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 19.4). A total of 26.3% of patients (5/19) died of local recurrence and 21.1% of patients (4/19) died of metastases. One suffered from a grade 1 skin reaction. CONCLUSIONS: (125)I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The high local control results and low morbidity merits further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3607919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36079192013-03-27 An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy Zhu, Lihong Jiang, Yuliang Wang, Junjie Ran, Weiqiang Yuan, Huishu Liu, Chen Qu, Ang Yang, Ruijie World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: A preliminary assessment was conducted of the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of (125)I seed implantation for recurrent head and neck carcinoma after surgery and external beam radiotherapy. METHODS: Nineteen patients with recurrent head and neck carcinomas underwent (125)I seed implantation under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. The actuarial D90 of (125)I seed implantation ranged from 90 to 160 Gy (median, 131 Gy). The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 44 months (median, 11 months). RESULTS: The median local control was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 10.2 to 37.8). The one- year, two-year and three-year local controls were 73.3%, 27.5% and 27.5%, respectively, whereas the one-year, two-year and three-year survival rates were 53.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, respectively, and the median survival was 13 months (95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 19.4). A total of 26.3% of patients (5/19) died of local recurrence and 21.1% of patients (4/19) died of metastases. One suffered from a grade 1 skin reaction. CONCLUSIONS: (125)I seed implantation is feasible and safe as a salvage treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancers. The high local control results and low morbidity merits further investigation. BioMed Central 2013-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3607919/ /pubmed/23496973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-60 Text en Copyright ©2013 Zhu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zhu, Lihong
Jiang, Yuliang
Wang, Junjie
Ran, Weiqiang
Yuan, Huishu
Liu, Chen
Qu, Ang
Yang, Ruijie
An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
title An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
title_full An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
title_fullStr An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
title_short An investigation of (125)I seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
title_sort investigation of (125)i seed permanent implantation for recurrent carcinoma in the head and neck after surgery and external beam radiotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-60
work_keys_str_mv AT zhulihong aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT jiangyuliang aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT wangjunjie aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT ranweiqiang aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT yuanhuishu aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT liuchen aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT quang aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT yangruijie aninvestigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT zhulihong investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT jiangyuliang investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT wangjunjie investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT ranweiqiang investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT yuanhuishu investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT liuchen investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT quang investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy
AT yangruijie investigationof125iseedpermanentimplantationforrecurrentcarcinomaintheheadandneckaftersurgeryandexternalbeamradiotherapy