Cargando…

Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND: Most patients with cancer prefer to die at home or in a hospice, but hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD).This study aims to explore the changing time trends of PoD and the associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Wei, Ho, Yuen K., Verne, Julia, Glickman, Myer, Higginson, Irene J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410
_version_ 1782264241268457472
author Gao, Wei
Ho, Yuen K.
Verne, Julia
Glickman, Myer
Higginson, Irene J.
author_facet Gao, Wei
Ho, Yuen K.
Verne, Julia
Glickman, Myer
Higginson, Irene J.
author_sort Gao, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most patients with cancer prefer to die at home or in a hospice, but hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD).This study aims to explore the changing time trends of PoD and the associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study analysed all cancer deaths in England collected by the Office for National Statistics during 1993–2010 (n = 2,281,223). Time trends of age- and gender-standardised proportion of deaths in individual PoDs were evaluated using weighted piecewise linear regression. Variables associated with PoD (home or hospice versus hospital) were determined using proportion ratio (PR) derived from the log-binomial regression, adjusting for clustering effects. Hospital remained the most common PoD throughout the study period (48.0%; 95% CI 47.9%–48.0%), followed by home (24.5%; 95% CI 24.4%–24.5%), and hospice (16.4%; 95% CI 16.3%–16.4%). Home and hospice deaths increased since 2005 (0.87%; 95% CI 0.74%–0.99%/year, 0.24%; 95% CI 0.17%–0.32%/year, respectively, p<0.001), while hospital deaths declined (−1.20%; 95% CI −1.41 to −0.99/year, p<0.001). Patients who died from haematological cancer (PRs 0.46–0.52), who were single, widowed, or divorced (PRs 0.75–0.88), and aged over 75 (PRs 0.81–0.84 for 75–84; 0.66–0.72 for 85+) were less likely to die in home or hospice (p<0.001; reference groups: colorectal cancer, married, age 25–54). There was little improvement in patients with lung cancer of dying in home or hospice (PRs 0.87–0.88). Marital status became the second most important factor associated with PoD, after cancer type. Patients from less deprived areas (higher quintile of the deprivation index) were more likely to die at home or in a hospice than those from more deprived areas (lower quintile of the deprivation index; PRs 1.02–1.12). The analysis is limited by a lack of data on individual patients' preferences for PoD or a clinical indication of the most appropriate PoD. CONCLUSIONS: More efforts are needed to reduce hospital deaths. Health care facilities should be improved and enhanced to support the increased home and hospice deaths. People who are single, widowed, or divorced should be a focus for end-of-life care improvement, along with known at risk groups such as haematological cancer, lung cancer, older age, and deprivation. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3608543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36085432013-04-03 Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study Gao, Wei Ho, Yuen K. Verne, Julia Glickman, Myer Higginson, Irene J. PLoS Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Most patients with cancer prefer to die at home or in a hospice, but hospitals remain the most common place of death (PoD).This study aims to explore the changing time trends of PoD and the associated factors, which are essential for end-of-life care improvement. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The study analysed all cancer deaths in England collected by the Office for National Statistics during 1993–2010 (n = 2,281,223). Time trends of age- and gender-standardised proportion of deaths in individual PoDs were evaluated using weighted piecewise linear regression. Variables associated with PoD (home or hospice versus hospital) were determined using proportion ratio (PR) derived from the log-binomial regression, adjusting for clustering effects. Hospital remained the most common PoD throughout the study period (48.0%; 95% CI 47.9%–48.0%), followed by home (24.5%; 95% CI 24.4%–24.5%), and hospice (16.4%; 95% CI 16.3%–16.4%). Home and hospice deaths increased since 2005 (0.87%; 95% CI 0.74%–0.99%/year, 0.24%; 95% CI 0.17%–0.32%/year, respectively, p<0.001), while hospital deaths declined (−1.20%; 95% CI −1.41 to −0.99/year, p<0.001). Patients who died from haematological cancer (PRs 0.46–0.52), who were single, widowed, or divorced (PRs 0.75–0.88), and aged over 75 (PRs 0.81–0.84 for 75–84; 0.66–0.72 for 85+) were less likely to die in home or hospice (p<0.001; reference groups: colorectal cancer, married, age 25–54). There was little improvement in patients with lung cancer of dying in home or hospice (PRs 0.87–0.88). Marital status became the second most important factor associated with PoD, after cancer type. Patients from less deprived areas (higher quintile of the deprivation index) were more likely to die at home or in a hospice than those from more deprived areas (lower quintile of the deprivation index; PRs 1.02–1.12). The analysis is limited by a lack of data on individual patients' preferences for PoD or a clinical indication of the most appropriate PoD. CONCLUSIONS: More efforts are needed to reduce hospital deaths. Health care facilities should be improved and enhanced to support the increased home and hospice deaths. People who are single, widowed, or divorced should be a focus for end-of-life care improvement, along with known at risk groups such as haematological cancer, lung cancer, older age, and deprivation. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary Public Library of Science 2013-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3608543/ /pubmed/23555201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410 Text en © 2013 Gao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gao, Wei
Ho, Yuen K.
Verne, Julia
Glickman, Myer
Higginson, Irene J.
Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study
title Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study
title_full Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study
title_short Changing Patterns in Place of Cancer Death in England: A Population-Based Study
title_sort changing patterns in place of cancer death in england: a population-based study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001410
work_keys_str_mv AT gaowei changingpatternsinplaceofcancerdeathinenglandapopulationbasedstudy
AT hoyuenk changingpatternsinplaceofcancerdeathinenglandapopulationbasedstudy
AT vernejulia changingpatternsinplaceofcancerdeathinenglandapopulationbasedstudy
AT glickmanmyer changingpatternsinplaceofcancerdeathinenglandapopulationbasedstudy
AT higginsonirenej changingpatternsinplaceofcancerdeathinenglandapopulationbasedstudy
AT changingpatternsinplaceofcancerdeathinenglandapopulationbasedstudy