Cargando…

Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) to image the three groups of corneal epithelial cells fractionated by a novel rapid centrifugation isolation technique. METHODS: Epithelial cells harvested from primary cultures of rabbit limbal rings were centrifuged onto uncoated dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wei, Gao, Zongyin, Shao, Dongping, Zhang, Liu, Wang, Caixia, Zhang, Yuping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059282
_version_ 1782264261214470144
author Zhang, Wei
Gao, Zongyin
Shao, Dongping
Zhang, Liu
Wang, Caixia
Zhang, Yuping
author_facet Zhang, Wei
Gao, Zongyin
Shao, Dongping
Zhang, Liu
Wang, Caixia
Zhang, Yuping
author_sort Zhang, Wei
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) to image the three groups of corneal epithelial cells fractionated by a novel rapid centrifugation isolation technique. METHODS: Epithelial cells harvested from primary cultures of rabbit limbal rings were centrifuged onto uncoated dishes, first at 1400 rpm and then at 1800 rpm. The adherent cells after centrifugation at 1400 rpm (ATC1), the adherent cells at 1800 rpm (ATC2) and the non-adherent cells at 1800 rpm (NAC) were investigated for BrdU retention and were subjected to contact mode AFM and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: Compared with unfractionated cells, the ATC1 group, accounting for about 10% of the whole population, was enriched in BrdU label-retaining cells. There were dramatic overall shape, surface membrane and intra-cellular ultrastructure differences noted among ATC1, ATC2 and NAC populations. The whole cell roughness measurements were 21.1±1.5 nm, 79.5±3.4 nm and 103±4.6 nm for the ATC1, ATC2 and NAC groups, respectively. The mero-nucleus roughness measurements were 34.2±1.7 nm, 13.0±0.8 nm and 8.5±0.5 nm in the ATC1, ATC2 and NAC populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AFM was found to be a good tool for distinguishing among the three groups of cells. BrdU label retention, the AFM parameters and TEM together suggest that the ATC1, ATC2 and NAC populations may be progenitor corneal epithelial cells, transit amplifying cells and terminal differentiation cells, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3608637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36086372013-04-03 Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique Zhang, Wei Gao, Zongyin Shao, Dongping Zhang, Liu Wang, Caixia Zhang, Yuping PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) to image the three groups of corneal epithelial cells fractionated by a novel rapid centrifugation isolation technique. METHODS: Epithelial cells harvested from primary cultures of rabbit limbal rings were centrifuged onto uncoated dishes, first at 1400 rpm and then at 1800 rpm. The adherent cells after centrifugation at 1400 rpm (ATC1), the adherent cells at 1800 rpm (ATC2) and the non-adherent cells at 1800 rpm (NAC) were investigated for BrdU retention and were subjected to contact mode AFM and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM). RESULTS: Compared with unfractionated cells, the ATC1 group, accounting for about 10% of the whole population, was enriched in BrdU label-retaining cells. There were dramatic overall shape, surface membrane and intra-cellular ultrastructure differences noted among ATC1, ATC2 and NAC populations. The whole cell roughness measurements were 21.1±1.5 nm, 79.5±3.4 nm and 103±4.6 nm for the ATC1, ATC2 and NAC groups, respectively. The mero-nucleus roughness measurements were 34.2±1.7 nm, 13.0±0.8 nm and 8.5±0.5 nm in the ATC1, ATC2 and NAC populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AFM was found to be a good tool for distinguishing among the three groups of cells. BrdU label retention, the AFM parameters and TEM together suggest that the ATC1, ATC2 and NAC populations may be progenitor corneal epithelial cells, transit amplifying cells and terminal differentiation cells, respectively. Public Library of Science 2013-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3608637/ /pubmed/23555648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059282 Text en © 2013 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Wei
Gao, Zongyin
Shao, Dongping
Zhang, Liu
Wang, Caixia
Zhang, Yuping
Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique
title Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique
title_full Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique
title_fullStr Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique
title_full_unstemmed Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique
title_short Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of Progenitor Corneal Epithelial Cells Fractionated by a Rapid Centrifugation Isolation Technique
title_sort atomic force microscopy analysis of progenitor corneal epithelial cells fractionated by a rapid centrifugation isolation technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059282
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwei atomicforcemicroscopyanalysisofprogenitorcornealepithelialcellsfractionatedbyarapidcentrifugationisolationtechnique
AT gaozongyin atomicforcemicroscopyanalysisofprogenitorcornealepithelialcellsfractionatedbyarapidcentrifugationisolationtechnique
AT shaodongping atomicforcemicroscopyanalysisofprogenitorcornealepithelialcellsfractionatedbyarapidcentrifugationisolationtechnique
AT zhangliu atomicforcemicroscopyanalysisofprogenitorcornealepithelialcellsfractionatedbyarapidcentrifugationisolationtechnique
AT wangcaixia atomicforcemicroscopyanalysisofprogenitorcornealepithelialcellsfractionatedbyarapidcentrifugationisolationtechnique
AT zhangyuping atomicforcemicroscopyanalysisofprogenitorcornealepithelialcellsfractionatedbyarapidcentrifugationisolationtechnique