Cargando…

DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the quantity of fat is different across the central (that is, android, trunk) and peripheral (that is, arm, leg and gynoid) regions among young African-American (AA), Asian (AS), Hispanic (HI) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) men. SUBJECTS AND ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stults-Kolehmainen, M A, Stanforth, P R, Bartholomew, J B, Lu, T, Abolt, C J, Sinha, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2013.5
_version_ 1782264282960887808
author Stults-Kolehmainen, M A
Stanforth, P R
Bartholomew, J B
Lu, T
Abolt, C J
Sinha, R
author_facet Stults-Kolehmainen, M A
Stanforth, P R
Bartholomew, J B
Lu, T
Abolt, C J
Sinha, R
author_sort Stults-Kolehmainen, M A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the quantity of fat is different across the central (that is, android, trunk) and peripheral (that is, arm, leg and gynoid) regions among young African-American (AA), Asian (AS), Hispanic (HI) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) men. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 852 men (18–30 years; mean total body fat percent (TBF%)=18.8±7.9, range=3.7–45.4) were assessed for body composition in five body regions via dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: HI men (21.8±8.3) had higher TBF% than AA (17.0±10.0), NHW (17.9±7.2) and AS (18.9±8.0) groups (P-values <0.0001). AS had a lower BMI (23.9±3.4) than all other groups, and NHW (24.7±3.2) had a lower BMI than HI (25.7±3.9) and AA (26.5±4.7; P-values<0.0001). A linear mixed model (LMM) revealed a significant ethnicity by region fat% interaction (P<0.0001). HI men had a greater fat% than NHW for every region (adjusted means (%); android: 29.6 vs 23.3; arm: 13.3 vs 10.6; gynoid: 27.2 vs 23.8; leg: 21.2 vs 18.3; trunk: 25.5 vs 20.6) and a greater fat% than AA for every region except the arm. In addition, in the android and trunk regions, HI had a greater fat% than AS, and AS had a higher fat% than AA. Finally, the android fat% for AS was higher than that of NHW. When comparing the region fat% within ethnicities, the android region was greater than the gynoid region for AS and HI, but did not differ for AA and NHW, and the arm region had the least fat% in all ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Fat deposition and body fat patterning varies by ethnicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3608895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36088952013-03-28 DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men Stults-Kolehmainen, M A Stanforth, P R Bartholomew, J B Lu, T Abolt, C J Sinha, R Nutr Diabetes Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the quantity of fat is different across the central (that is, android, trunk) and peripheral (that is, arm, leg and gynoid) regions among young African-American (AA), Asian (AS), Hispanic (HI) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) men. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 852 men (18–30 years; mean total body fat percent (TBF%)=18.8±7.9, range=3.7–45.4) were assessed for body composition in five body regions via dual-emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: HI men (21.8±8.3) had higher TBF% than AA (17.0±10.0), NHW (17.9±7.2) and AS (18.9±8.0) groups (P-values <0.0001). AS had a lower BMI (23.9±3.4) than all other groups, and NHW (24.7±3.2) had a lower BMI than HI (25.7±3.9) and AA (26.5±4.7; P-values<0.0001). A linear mixed model (LMM) revealed a significant ethnicity by region fat% interaction (P<0.0001). HI men had a greater fat% than NHW for every region (adjusted means (%); android: 29.6 vs 23.3; arm: 13.3 vs 10.6; gynoid: 27.2 vs 23.8; leg: 21.2 vs 18.3; trunk: 25.5 vs 20.6) and a greater fat% than AA for every region except the arm. In addition, in the android and trunk regions, HI had a greater fat% than AS, and AS had a higher fat% than AA. Finally, the android fat% for AS was higher than that of NHW. When comparing the region fat% within ethnicities, the android region was greater than the gynoid region for AS and HI, but did not differ for AA and NHW, and the arm region had the least fat% in all ethnicities. CONCLUSIONS: Fat deposition and body fat patterning varies by ethnicity. Nature Publishing Group 2013-03 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3608895/ /pubmed/23507968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2013.5 Text en Copyright © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Stults-Kolehmainen, M A
Stanforth, P R
Bartholomew, J B
Lu, T
Abolt, C J
Sinha, R
DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
title DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
title_full DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
title_fullStr DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
title_full_unstemmed DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
title_short DXA estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
title_sort dxa estimates of fat in abdominal, trunk and hip regions varies by ethnicity in men
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nutd.2013.5
work_keys_str_mv AT stultskolehmainenma dxaestimatesoffatinabdominaltrunkandhipregionsvariesbyethnicityinmen
AT stanforthpr dxaestimatesoffatinabdominaltrunkandhipregionsvariesbyethnicityinmen
AT bartholomewjb dxaestimatesoffatinabdominaltrunkandhipregionsvariesbyethnicityinmen
AT lut dxaestimatesoffatinabdominaltrunkandhipregionsvariesbyethnicityinmen
AT aboltcj dxaestimatesoffatinabdominaltrunkandhipregionsvariesbyethnicityinmen
AT sinhar dxaestimatesoffatinabdominaltrunkandhipregionsvariesbyethnicityinmen