Cargando…

Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?

Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Objective: To compare fusion rates, time to fusion, complication rates and subsidence between 1) a static, 2) a dynamic angulation, and 3) a dynamic translation plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic degenerative cervical disease....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ragab, Ashraf A., Hodges, F. Spain, Hill, Clint P., McGuire, Robert A., Tucci, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100892
_version_ 1782264300878954496
author Ragab, Ashraf A.
Hodges, F. Spain
Hill, Clint P.
McGuire, Robert A.
Tucci, Michelle
author_facet Ragab, Ashraf A.
Hodges, F. Spain
Hill, Clint P.
McGuire, Robert A.
Tucci, Michelle
author_sort Ragab, Ashraf A.
collection PubMed
description Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Objective: To compare fusion rates, time to fusion, complication rates and subsidence between 1) a static, 2) a dynamic angulation, and 3) a dynamic translation plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic degenerative cervical disease. Methods: Thirty-six patients with two level, symptomatic cervical degenerative changes requiring surgery were randomized in a blinded fashion to receive a statically locked plate, Cervical Spine Locking Plate (CSLP) (Synthes, Paoli, PN, USA), an Atlantis Vision(®) Anterior Cervical Plate System (Medtronic, Memphis, TN, USA) which allows angular dynamization, or a Premier(®) Anterior Cervical Plate System (Medtronic) which allows translational dynamization. Structured data collection and measurement protocols were used. Intervertebral composite allograft cages were used in all groups. Identical external immobilization and antiinflammatory medication protocols were followed. X-rays were obtained at preset time points postoperatively. Assessment of the primary outcomes was blinded. Rate of and time to fusion, graft/instrumentation complications, subsidence, and reoperation for adjacent level disease were measured. Paired t-test and three-way Analysis of Variance test (ANOVA) were used to assess statistical differences between groups. Results: The three groups were similar demographically. Fusion rates in the CSLP, Atlantis and Premier plate groups were 100%, 91%, and 92% respectively. Mean time to fusion was 6.1, 8.3 and 6.3 months respectively but differences were not statistically significant. Mean subsidence in the groups was 1.9, 1.6, and 2.6 mm respectively. Subsidence was found even for the static (CSLP) plate, but no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusions: We found no clinical advantage of dynamic plates over static plates with regards to fusion rates, time to fusion, subsidence, complications, or adjacent-level surgery. Static plating allows for subsidence at similar levels to dynamic plating. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3608998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36089982013-03-29 Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help? Ragab, Ashraf A. Hodges, F. Spain Hill, Clint P. McGuire, Robert A. Tucci, Michelle Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Objective: To compare fusion rates, time to fusion, complication rates and subsidence between 1) a static, 2) a dynamic angulation, and 3) a dynamic translation plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for symptomatic degenerative cervical disease. Methods: Thirty-six patients with two level, symptomatic cervical degenerative changes requiring surgery were randomized in a blinded fashion to receive a statically locked plate, Cervical Spine Locking Plate (CSLP) (Synthes, Paoli, PN, USA), an Atlantis Vision(®) Anterior Cervical Plate System (Medtronic, Memphis, TN, USA) which allows angular dynamization, or a Premier(®) Anterior Cervical Plate System (Medtronic) which allows translational dynamization. Structured data collection and measurement protocols were used. Intervertebral composite allograft cages were used in all groups. Identical external immobilization and antiinflammatory medication protocols were followed. X-rays were obtained at preset time points postoperatively. Assessment of the primary outcomes was blinded. Rate of and time to fusion, graft/instrumentation complications, subsidence, and reoperation for adjacent level disease were measured. Paired t-test and three-way Analysis of Variance test (ANOVA) were used to assess statistical differences between groups. Results: The three groups were similar demographically. Fusion rates in the CSLP, Atlantis and Premier plate groups were 100%, 91%, and 92% respectively. Mean time to fusion was 6.1, 8.3 and 6.3 months respectively but differences were not statistically significant. Mean subsidence in the groups was 1.9, 1.6, and 2.6 mm respectively. Subsidence was found even for the static (CSLP) plate, but no statistically significant differences were found. Conclusions: We found no clinical advantage of dynamic plates over static plates with regards to fusion rates, time to fusion, subsidence, complications, or adjacent-level surgery. Static plating allows for subsidence at similar levels to dynamic plating. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83. © AOSpine International 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3608998/ /pubmed/23544023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100892 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Ragab, Ashraf A.
Hodges, F. Spain
Hill, Clint P.
McGuire, Robert A.
Tucci, Michelle
Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?
title Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?
title_full Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?
title_fullStr Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?
title_short Dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: Does it help?
title_sort dynamic anterior cervical plating for multi-level spondylosis: does it help?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100892
work_keys_str_mv AT ragabashrafa dynamicanteriorcervicalplatingformultilevelspondylosisdoesithelp
AT hodgesfspain dynamicanteriorcervicalplatingformultilevelspondylosisdoesithelp
AT hillclintp dynamicanteriorcervicalplatingformultilevelspondylosisdoesithelp
AT mcguireroberta dynamicanteriorcervicalplatingformultilevelspondylosisdoesithelp
AT tuccimichelle dynamicanteriorcervicalplatingformultilevelspondylosisdoesithelp