Cargando…

Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review

Introduction: Os odontoideum is a rare condition with a controversial pathogenesis and poorly understood natural history. As a result, it is difficult for clinicians to predict which patients require surgical fusion to prevent symptomatic progression and potentially devastating neurologic injury. Me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Jefferson R., Dettori, Joseph R., VanAlstyne, Ellen M., Fehlings, Michael G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100896
_version_ 1782264301104398336
author Wilson, Jefferson R.
Dettori, Joseph R.
VanAlstyne, Ellen M.
Fehlings, Michael G.
author_facet Wilson, Jefferson R.
Dettori, Joseph R.
VanAlstyne, Ellen M.
Fehlings, Michael G.
author_sort Wilson, Jefferson R.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Os odontoideum is a rare condition with a controversial pathogenesis and poorly understood natural history. As a result, it is difficult for clinicians to predict which patients require surgical fusion to prevent symptomatic progression and potentially devastating neurologic injury. Methods: We undertook a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes in the treatment of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of os odontoideum. Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases as well as bibliographies of key articles were searched. Articles were reviewed by two independently working reviewers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set and each article was subject to a predefined quality rating scheme. Results: We identified eleven articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Seven studies included patients with asymptomatic os odontoideum discovered incidentally from which it was possible to examine data on 18 individuals. Six studies were identified containing more than 15 patients with symptomatic os odontoideum. Conclusion: The existing literature regarding both asymptomatic or symptomatic os odontoideum and its treatment is very limited. No definitive conclusions can be drawn from these studies. A basic approach to the management of os odontoideum is offered based on the findings of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3608999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36089992013-03-29 Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review Wilson, Jefferson R. Dettori, Joseph R. VanAlstyne, Ellen M. Fehlings, Michael G. Evid Based Spine Care J Article Introduction: Os odontoideum is a rare condition with a controversial pathogenesis and poorly understood natural history. As a result, it is difficult for clinicians to predict which patients require surgical fusion to prevent symptomatic progression and potentially devastating neurologic injury. Methods: We undertook a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes in the treatment of asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of os odontoideum. Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse Databases as well as bibliographies of key articles were searched. Articles were reviewed by two independently working reviewers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were set and each article was subject to a predefined quality rating scheme. Results: We identified eleven articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Seven studies included patients with asymptomatic os odontoideum discovered incidentally from which it was possible to examine data on 18 individuals. Six studies were identified containing more than 15 patients with symptomatic os odontoideum. Conclusion: The existing literature regarding both asymptomatic or symptomatic os odontoideum and its treatment is very limited. No definitive conclusions can be drawn from these studies. A basic approach to the management of os odontoideum is offered based on the findings of this study. © AOSpine International 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3608999/ /pubmed/23544027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100896 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Wilson, Jefferson R.
Dettori, Joseph R.
VanAlstyne, Ellen M.
Fehlings, Michael G.
Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
title Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
title_full Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
title_fullStr Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
title_short Addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
title_sort addressing the challenges and controversies of managing os odontoideum: results of a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3608999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100896
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonjeffersonr addressingthechallengesandcontroversiesofmanagingosodontoideumresultsofasystematicreview
AT dettorijosephr addressingthechallengesandcontroversiesofmanagingosodontoideumresultsofasystematicreview
AT vanalstyneellenm addressingthechallengesandcontroversiesofmanagingosodontoideumresultsofasystematicreview
AT fehlingsmichaelg addressingthechallengesandcontroversiesofmanagingosodontoideumresultsofasystematicreview