Cargando…

Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?

Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the presence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) at 3 years mean follow-up. Methods: Thirty patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy treated with anterior disc replacement (ADR) were studied....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbagallo, Giuseppe M., Corbino, Leonardo A., Olindo, Giuseppe, Albanese, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100888
_version_ 1782264302516830208
author Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.
Corbino, Leonardo A.
Olindo, Giuseppe
Albanese, Vincenzo
author_facet Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.
Corbino, Leonardo A.
Olindo, Giuseppe
Albanese, Vincenzo
author_sort Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.
collection PubMed
description Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the presence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) at 3 years mean follow-up. Methods: Thirty patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy treated with anterior disc replacement (ADR) were studied. HO was classified using the McAfee grading system. Range of motion was measured from flexion and extension x-rays. Short-form 36 and neck disability index (NDI) assessed functional outcome. Results: Forty-five prostheses were implanted in 30 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, mean age 40.9 years. Nineteen patients received 1 level and 11 patients received multilevel disc replacement. The incidence rate of HO was 42.2% (19 levels). Segmental range of motion was ≥3° in 93.8% of patients with HO. There was no significant difference in functional scores between those who did and those who did not develop HO. Males tended to develop HO more frequently than females, though this was not statistically significant. The indication for surgery (soft disc hernia or spondylosis) was not associated with the formation of HO. Conclusions: Functional improvement is maintained despite the presence of HO following cervical disc arthroplasty. Indications for arthroplasty should not be halted by the risk of HO. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3609005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36090052013-03-29 Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. Corbino, Leonardo A. Olindo, Giuseppe Albanese, Vincenzo Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the presence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) at 3 years mean follow-up. Methods: Thirty patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy treated with anterior disc replacement (ADR) were studied. HO was classified using the McAfee grading system. Range of motion was measured from flexion and extension x-rays. Short-form 36 and neck disability index (NDI) assessed functional outcome. Results: Forty-five prostheses were implanted in 30 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, mean age 40.9 years. Nineteen patients received 1 level and 11 patients received multilevel disc replacement. The incidence rate of HO was 42.2% (19 levels). Segmental range of motion was ≥3° in 93.8% of patients with HO. There was no significant difference in functional scores between those who did and those who did not develop HO. Males tended to develop HO more frequently than females, though this was not statistically significant. The indication for surgery (soft disc hernia or spondylosis) was not associated with the formation of HO. Conclusions: Functional improvement is maintained despite the presence of HO following cervical disc arthroplasty. Indications for arthroplasty should not be halted by the risk of HO. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83. © AOSpine International 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3609005/ /pubmed/23544019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100888 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Barbagallo, Giuseppe M.
Corbino, Leonardo A.
Olindo, Giuseppe
Albanese, Vincenzo
Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
title Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
title_full Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
title_fullStr Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
title_full_unstemmed Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
title_short Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
title_sort heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: is it clinically relevant?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100888
work_keys_str_mv AT barbagallogiuseppem heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant
AT corbinoleonardoa heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant
AT olindogiuseppe heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant
AT albanesevincenzo heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant