Cargando…
Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant?
Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the presence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) at 3 years mean follow-up. Methods: Thirty patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy treated with anterior disc replacement (ADR) were studied....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© AOSpine International
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100888 |
_version_ | 1782264302516830208 |
---|---|
author | Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. Corbino, Leonardo A. Olindo, Giuseppe Albanese, Vincenzo |
author_facet | Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. Corbino, Leonardo A. Olindo, Giuseppe Albanese, Vincenzo |
author_sort | Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the presence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) at 3 years mean follow-up. Methods: Thirty patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy treated with anterior disc replacement (ADR) were studied. HO was classified using the McAfee grading system. Range of motion was measured from flexion and extension x-rays. Short-form 36 and neck disability index (NDI) assessed functional outcome. Results: Forty-five prostheses were implanted in 30 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, mean age 40.9 years. Nineteen patients received 1 level and 11 patients received multilevel disc replacement. The incidence rate of HO was 42.2% (19 levels). Segmental range of motion was ≥3° in 93.8% of patients with HO. There was no significant difference in functional scores between those who did and those who did not develop HO. Males tended to develop HO more frequently than females, though this was not statistically significant. The indication for surgery (soft disc hernia or spondylosis) was not associated with the formation of HO. Conclusions: Functional improvement is maintained despite the presence of HO following cervical disc arthroplasty. Indications for arthroplasty should not be halted by the risk of HO. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3609005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | © AOSpine International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36090052013-03-29 Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. Corbino, Leonardo A. Olindo, Giuseppe Albanese, Vincenzo Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To analyze the presence and clinical relevance of heterotopic ossification (HO) at 3 years mean follow-up. Methods: Thirty patients suffering from cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy treated with anterior disc replacement (ADR) were studied. HO was classified using the McAfee grading system. Range of motion was measured from flexion and extension x-rays. Short-form 36 and neck disability index (NDI) assessed functional outcome. Results: Forty-five prostheses were implanted in 30 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, mean age 40.9 years. Nineteen patients received 1 level and 11 patients received multilevel disc replacement. The incidence rate of HO was 42.2% (19 levels). Segmental range of motion was ≥3° in 93.8% of patients with HO. There was no significant difference in functional scores between those who did and those who did not develop HO. Males tended to develop HO more frequently than females, though this was not statistically significant. The indication for surgery (soft disc hernia or spondylosis) was not associated with the formation of HO. Conclusions: Functional improvement is maintained despite the presence of HO following cervical disc arthroplasty. Indications for arthroplasty should not be halted by the risk of HO. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83. © AOSpine International 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3609005/ /pubmed/23544019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100888 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. Corbino, Leonardo A. Olindo, Giuseppe Albanese, Vincenzo Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? |
title | Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? |
title_full | Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? |
title_fullStr | Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? |
title_full_unstemmed | Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? |
title_short | Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: Is it clinically relevant? |
title_sort | heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: is it clinically relevant? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100888 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbagallogiuseppem heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant AT corbinoleonardoa heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant AT olindogiuseppe heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant AT albanesevincenzo heterotopicossificationincervicaldiscarthroplastyisitclinicallyrelevant |