Cargando…

ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?

Study design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare clinical results and to determine differences in outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and disc arthroplasty in patients treated for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. Method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vorsic, Matjaz, Bunc, Gorazd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © AOSpine International 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100894
_version_ 1782264302768488448
author Vorsic, Matjaz
Bunc, Gorazd
author_facet Vorsic, Matjaz
Bunc, Gorazd
author_sort Vorsic, Matjaz
collection PubMed
description Study design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare clinical results and to determine differences in outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and disc arthroplasty in patients treated for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. Methods: Forty patients with cervical degenerative disc disease were treated with ProDisc-C disc arthroplasty and 40 patients with fusion using an intervetebral spacer with integrated fixation (Cervios chronoOS) implants without additional anterior fixation. Fifty disc prostheses were placed in the first group and 52 intervertebral spacers were implanted in the second group. Clinical outcomes were assessed before and 12 months following the procedure using the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, with 15% improvement in NDI and 20% in VAS defined as a clinically significant. Results: Eighty patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with a mean age of 49.7 years were included in the study with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The groups were similar at baseline both clinically and statistically (P > .05) except for age and VAS for arm pain. Both groups had a statistically significant improvement in NDI and VAS for neck and arm pain (P < .05) and the arthroplasty group had a better improvement according to NDI (74.3% of patients in the arthroplasty group achieved ≥15% improvement in NDI versus 65.7% of patients in ACDF group). Conclusions: Both ProDisc C and Cervios chronoOS prostheses resulted in significant pain reduction and functional outcome for the patients with slightly better results in the group treated with disc arthroplasty 12 months after the surgery. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3609006
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher © AOSpine International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36090062013-03-29 ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months? Vorsic, Matjaz Bunc, Gorazd Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study design: Prospective cohort study. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare clinical results and to determine differences in outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and disc arthroplasty in patients treated for symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease. Methods: Forty patients with cervical degenerative disc disease were treated with ProDisc-C disc arthroplasty and 40 patients with fusion using an intervetebral spacer with integrated fixation (Cervios chronoOS) implants without additional anterior fixation. Fifty disc prostheses were placed in the first group and 52 intervertebral spacers were implanted in the second group. Clinical outcomes were assessed before and 12 months following the procedure using the neck disability index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, with 15% improvement in NDI and 20% in VAS defined as a clinically significant. Results: Eighty patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with a mean age of 49.7 years were included in the study with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The groups were similar at baseline both clinically and statistically (P > .05) except for age and VAS for arm pain. Both groups had a statistically significant improvement in NDI and VAS for neck and arm pain (P < .05) and the arthroplasty group had a better improvement according to NDI (74.3% of patients in the arthroplasty group achieved ≥15% improvement in NDI versus 65.7% of patients in ACDF group). Conclusions: Both ProDisc C and Cervios chronoOS prostheses resulted in significant pain reduction and functional outcome for the patients with slightly better results in the group treated with disc arthroplasty 12 months after the surgery. [Table: see text] The definiton of the different classes of evidence is available on page 83. © AOSpine International 2010-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3609006/ /pubmed/23544025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100894 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Vorsic, Matjaz
Bunc, Gorazd
ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?
title ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?
title_full ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?
title_fullStr ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?
title_full_unstemmed ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?
title_short ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronOS prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?
title_sort prodisc-c versus fusion with cervios chronos prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: is there a difference at 12 months?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609006/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23544025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1100894
work_keys_str_mv AT vorsicmatjaz prodisccversusfusionwithcervioschronosprosthesisincervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseisthereadifferenceat12months
AT buncgorazd prodisccversusfusionwithcervioschronosprosthesisincervicaldegenerativediscdiseaseisthereadifferenceat12months