Cargando…
When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test
The possibility to enhance the detection efficiency of the Concealed Information Test (CIT) by increasing executive load was investigated, using an interference design. After learning and executing a mock crime scenario, subjects underwent three deception detection tests: an RT-based CIT, an RT-base...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23543918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00146 |
_version_ | 1782264394726506496 |
---|---|
author | Visu-Petra, George Varga, Mihai Miclea, Mircea Visu-Petra, Laura |
author_facet | Visu-Petra, George Varga, Mihai Miclea, Mircea Visu-Petra, Laura |
author_sort | Visu-Petra, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | The possibility to enhance the detection efficiency of the Concealed Information Test (CIT) by increasing executive load was investigated, using an interference design. After learning and executing a mock crime scenario, subjects underwent three deception detection tests: an RT-based CIT, an RT-based CIT plus a concurrent memory task (CITMem), and an RT-based CIT plus a concurrent set-shifting task (CITShift). The concealed information effect, consisting in increased RT and lower response accuracy for probe items compared to irrelevant items, was evidenced across all three conditions. The group analyses indicated a larger difference between RTs to probe and irrelevant items in the dual-task conditions, but this difference was not translated in a significantly increased detection efficiency at an individual level. Signal detection parameters based on the comparison with a simulated innocent group showed accurate discrimination for all conditions. Overall response accuracy on the CITMem was highest and the difference between response accuracy to probes and irrelevants was smallest in this condition. Accuracy on the concurrent tasks (Mem and Shift) was high, and responses on these tasks were significantly influenced by CIT stimulus type (probes vs. irrelevants). The findings are interpreted in relation to the cognitive load/dual-task interference literature, generating important insights for research on the involvement of executive functions in deceptive behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3610081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36100812013-03-29 When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test Visu-Petra, George Varga, Mihai Miclea, Mircea Visu-Petra, Laura Front Psychol Psychology The possibility to enhance the detection efficiency of the Concealed Information Test (CIT) by increasing executive load was investigated, using an interference design. After learning and executing a mock crime scenario, subjects underwent three deception detection tests: an RT-based CIT, an RT-based CIT plus a concurrent memory task (CITMem), and an RT-based CIT plus a concurrent set-shifting task (CITShift). The concealed information effect, consisting in increased RT and lower response accuracy for probe items compared to irrelevant items, was evidenced across all three conditions. The group analyses indicated a larger difference between RTs to probe and irrelevant items in the dual-task conditions, but this difference was not translated in a significantly increased detection efficiency at an individual level. Signal detection parameters based on the comparison with a simulated innocent group showed accurate discrimination for all conditions. Overall response accuracy on the CITMem was highest and the difference between response accuracy to probes and irrelevants was smallest in this condition. Accuracy on the concurrent tasks (Mem and Shift) was high, and responses on these tasks were significantly influenced by CIT stimulus type (probes vs. irrelevants). The findings are interpreted in relation to the cognitive load/dual-task interference literature, generating important insights for research on the involvement of executive functions in deceptive behavior. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3610081/ /pubmed/23543918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00146 Text en Copyright © 2013 Visu-Petra, Varga, Miclea and Visu-Petra. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Visu-Petra, George Varga, Mihai Miclea, Mircea Visu-Petra, Laura When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test |
title | When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test |
title_full | When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test |
title_fullStr | When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test |
title_full_unstemmed | When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test |
title_short | When Interference Helps: Increasing Executive Load to Facilitate Deception Detection in the Concealed Information Test |
title_sort | when interference helps: increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23543918 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT visupetrageorge wheninterferencehelpsincreasingexecutiveloadtofacilitatedeceptiondetectionintheconcealedinformationtest AT vargamihai wheninterferencehelpsincreasingexecutiveloadtofacilitatedeceptiondetectionintheconcealedinformationtest AT micleamircea wheninterferencehelpsincreasingexecutiveloadtofacilitatedeceptiondetectionintheconcealedinformationtest AT visupetralaura wheninterferencehelpsincreasingexecutiveloadtofacilitatedeceptiondetectionintheconcealedinformationtest |