Cargando…

Field et al. Redux.

On 12 February 1988 (by coincidence Charles Darwin’s birthday), a paper published in Science by Katherine Field, Rudy Raff, and colleagues presented the first credible molecular analysis of metazoan phylogeny based on sequences from the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU). Here I examine the main...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Telford, Maximilian J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23398689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-4-5
_version_ 1782264410896596992
author Telford, Maximilian J
author_facet Telford, Maximilian J
author_sort Telford, Maximilian J
collection PubMed
description On 12 February 1988 (by coincidence Charles Darwin’s birthday), a paper published in Science by Katherine Field, Rudy Raff, and colleagues presented the first credible molecular analysis of metazoan phylogeny based on sequences from the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU). Here I examine the main conclusions reached in this manuscript. I reconstitute their dataset and, by recompiling software available in 1988, I consider how they might have achieved a more accurate tree. I show how three common methods to avoid systematic error - more data, careful taxon sampling and superior models of evolution - overcome the errors that exist in the original paper. This approach illustrates the basis of some of the major advances of the past 25 years resulting in our current understanding of animal phylogeny.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3610153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36101532013-03-29 Field et al. Redux. Telford, Maximilian J EvoDevo Commentary On 12 February 1988 (by coincidence Charles Darwin’s birthday), a paper published in Science by Katherine Field, Rudy Raff, and colleagues presented the first credible molecular analysis of metazoan phylogeny based on sequences from the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU). Here I examine the main conclusions reached in this manuscript. I reconstitute their dataset and, by recompiling software available in 1988, I consider how they might have achieved a more accurate tree. I show how three common methods to avoid systematic error - more data, careful taxon sampling and superior models of evolution - overcome the errors that exist in the original paper. This approach illustrates the basis of some of the major advances of the past 25 years resulting in our current understanding of animal phylogeny. BioMed Central 2013-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3610153/ /pubmed/23398689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-4-5 Text en Copyright ©2013 Telford; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Telford, Maximilian J
Field et al. Redux.
title Field et al. Redux.
title_full Field et al. Redux.
title_fullStr Field et al. Redux.
title_full_unstemmed Field et al. Redux.
title_short Field et al. Redux.
title_sort field et al. redux.
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23398689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-4-5
work_keys_str_mv AT telfordmaximilianj fieldetalredux