Cargando…
Field et al. Redux.
On 12 February 1988 (by coincidence Charles Darwin’s birthday), a paper published in Science by Katherine Field, Rudy Raff, and colleagues presented the first credible molecular analysis of metazoan phylogeny based on sequences from the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU). Here I examine the main...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23398689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-4-5 |
_version_ | 1782264410896596992 |
---|---|
author | Telford, Maximilian J |
author_facet | Telford, Maximilian J |
author_sort | Telford, Maximilian J |
collection | PubMed |
description | On 12 February 1988 (by coincidence Charles Darwin’s birthday), a paper published in Science by Katherine Field, Rudy Raff, and colleagues presented the first credible molecular analysis of metazoan phylogeny based on sequences from the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU). Here I examine the main conclusions reached in this manuscript. I reconstitute their dataset and, by recompiling software available in 1988, I consider how they might have achieved a more accurate tree. I show how three common methods to avoid systematic error - more data, careful taxon sampling and superior models of evolution - overcome the errors that exist in the original paper. This approach illustrates the basis of some of the major advances of the past 25 years resulting in our current understanding of animal phylogeny. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3610153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36101532013-03-29 Field et al. Redux. Telford, Maximilian J EvoDevo Commentary On 12 February 1988 (by coincidence Charles Darwin’s birthday), a paper published in Science by Katherine Field, Rudy Raff, and colleagues presented the first credible molecular analysis of metazoan phylogeny based on sequences from the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU). Here I examine the main conclusions reached in this manuscript. I reconstitute their dataset and, by recompiling software available in 1988, I consider how they might have achieved a more accurate tree. I show how three common methods to avoid systematic error - more data, careful taxon sampling and superior models of evolution - overcome the errors that exist in the original paper. This approach illustrates the basis of some of the major advances of the past 25 years resulting in our current understanding of animal phylogeny. BioMed Central 2013-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3610153/ /pubmed/23398689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-4-5 Text en Copyright ©2013 Telford; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Telford, Maximilian J Field et al. Redux. |
title | Field et al. Redux. |
title_full | Field et al. Redux. |
title_fullStr | Field et al. Redux. |
title_full_unstemmed | Field et al. Redux. |
title_short | Field et al. Redux. |
title_sort | field et al. redux. |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23398689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-9139-4-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT telfordmaximilianj fieldetalredux |