Cargando…

Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend universal prenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset neonatal GBS infection. Interventions to promote physician adherence to these guidelines are imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Jussara M, Stein, Airton T, Schünemann, Holger J, Bordin, Ronaldo, Kuchenbecker, Ricardo, de Lourdes Drachler, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-68
_version_ 1782264436164132864
author Silva, Jussara M
Stein, Airton T
Schünemann, Holger J
Bordin, Ronaldo
Kuchenbecker, Ricardo
de Lourdes Drachler, Maria
author_facet Silva, Jussara M
Stein, Airton T
Schünemann, Holger J
Bordin, Ronaldo
Kuchenbecker, Ricardo
de Lourdes Drachler, Maria
author_sort Silva, Jussara M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend universal prenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset neonatal GBS infection. Interventions to promote physician adherence to these guidelines are imperative. This study examined the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) of obstetricians, compared with CPG mailshot and no intervention, on the screening of pregnant women for GBS. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the medical cooperative of Porto Alegre, Brazil. All obstetricians who assisted in a delivery covered by private health insurance managed by the cooperative in the 3 months preceding the study (n = 241) were invited to participate. The obstetricians were randomized to three groups: direct mail (DM, n = 76), AD (n = 76) and control (C, n = 89, no intervention). Those in the DM group were sent guidelines on GBS. The AD group received the guidelines and an educational visit detailing the guidelines, which was conducted by a trained physician. Data on obstetrician age, gender, time since graduation, whether patients received GBS screening during pregnancy, and obstetricians who requested screening were collected for all participant obstetricians for 3 months before and after the intervention, using database from the private health insurance information system. RESULTS: Three months post-intervention, the data showed that the proportion of pregnant women screened for GBS was higher in the AD group (25.4%) than in the DM (15.9%) and C (17.7%) groups (P = 0.023). Similar results emerged when the three groups were taken as a cluster (pregnant women and their obstetricians), but the difference was not statistically significant (Poisson regression, P = 0.108). Additionally, when vaginal deliveries were analyzed separately, the proportion screened was higher in the AD group (75%) than in the DM group (41.9%) and the C group (30.4%) (chi-square, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that AD increased the prevalence of GBS screening in pregnant women in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3610286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36102862013-03-29 Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial Silva, Jussara M Stein, Airton T Schünemann, Holger J Bordin, Ronaldo Kuchenbecker, Ricardo de Lourdes Drachler, Maria BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend universal prenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset neonatal GBS infection. Interventions to promote physician adherence to these guidelines are imperative. This study examined the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) of obstetricians, compared with CPG mailshot and no intervention, on the screening of pregnant women for GBS. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the medical cooperative of Porto Alegre, Brazil. All obstetricians who assisted in a delivery covered by private health insurance managed by the cooperative in the 3 months preceding the study (n = 241) were invited to participate. The obstetricians were randomized to three groups: direct mail (DM, n = 76), AD (n = 76) and control (C, n = 89, no intervention). Those in the DM group were sent guidelines on GBS. The AD group received the guidelines and an educational visit detailing the guidelines, which was conducted by a trained physician. Data on obstetrician age, gender, time since graduation, whether patients received GBS screening during pregnancy, and obstetricians who requested screening were collected for all participant obstetricians for 3 months before and after the intervention, using database from the private health insurance information system. RESULTS: Three months post-intervention, the data showed that the proportion of pregnant women screened for GBS was higher in the AD group (25.4%) than in the DM (15.9%) and C (17.7%) groups (P = 0.023). Similar results emerged when the three groups were taken as a cluster (pregnant women and their obstetricians), but the difference was not statistically significant (Poisson regression, P = 0.108). Additionally, when vaginal deliveries were analyzed separately, the proportion screened was higher in the AD group (75%) than in the DM group (41.9%) and the C group (30.4%) (chi-square, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that AD increased the prevalence of GBS screening in pregnant women in this population. BioMed Central 2013-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3610286/ /pubmed/23510061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-68 Text en Copyright ©2013 Silva et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Silva, Jussara M
Stein, Airton T
Schünemann, Holger J
Bordin, Ronaldo
Kuchenbecker, Ricardo
de Lourdes Drachler, Maria
Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
title Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for group b streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-68
work_keys_str_mv AT silvajussaram academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT steinairtont academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schunemannholgerj academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bordinronaldo academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kuchenbeckerricardo academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT delourdesdrachlermaria academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial