Cargando…
Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend universal prenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset neonatal GBS infection. Interventions to promote physician adherence to these guidelines are imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-68 |
_version_ | 1782264436164132864 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Jussara M Stein, Airton T Schünemann, Holger J Bordin, Ronaldo Kuchenbecker, Ricardo de Lourdes Drachler, Maria |
author_facet | Silva, Jussara M Stein, Airton T Schünemann, Holger J Bordin, Ronaldo Kuchenbecker, Ricardo de Lourdes Drachler, Maria |
author_sort | Silva, Jussara M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend universal prenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset neonatal GBS infection. Interventions to promote physician adherence to these guidelines are imperative. This study examined the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) of obstetricians, compared with CPG mailshot and no intervention, on the screening of pregnant women for GBS. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the medical cooperative of Porto Alegre, Brazil. All obstetricians who assisted in a delivery covered by private health insurance managed by the cooperative in the 3 months preceding the study (n = 241) were invited to participate. The obstetricians were randomized to three groups: direct mail (DM, n = 76), AD (n = 76) and control (C, n = 89, no intervention). Those in the DM group were sent guidelines on GBS. The AD group received the guidelines and an educational visit detailing the guidelines, which was conducted by a trained physician. Data on obstetrician age, gender, time since graduation, whether patients received GBS screening during pregnancy, and obstetricians who requested screening were collected for all participant obstetricians for 3 months before and after the intervention, using database from the private health insurance information system. RESULTS: Three months post-intervention, the data showed that the proportion of pregnant women screened for GBS was higher in the AD group (25.4%) than in the DM (15.9%) and C (17.7%) groups (P = 0.023). Similar results emerged when the three groups were taken as a cluster (pregnant women and their obstetricians), but the difference was not statistically significant (Poisson regression, P = 0.108). Additionally, when vaginal deliveries were analyzed separately, the proportion screened was higher in the AD group (75%) than in the DM group (41.9%) and the C group (30.4%) (chi-square, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that AD increased the prevalence of GBS screening in pregnant women in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3610286 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36102862013-03-29 Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial Silva, Jussara M Stein, Airton T Schünemann, Holger J Bordin, Ronaldo Kuchenbecker, Ricardo de Lourdes Drachler, Maria BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommend universal prenatal screening for Group B Streptococcus (GBS) to identify candidates for intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent early onset neonatal GBS infection. Interventions to promote physician adherence to these guidelines are imperative. This study examined the effectiveness of academic detailing (AD) of obstetricians, compared with CPG mailshot and no intervention, on the screening of pregnant women for GBS. METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the medical cooperative of Porto Alegre, Brazil. All obstetricians who assisted in a delivery covered by private health insurance managed by the cooperative in the 3 months preceding the study (n = 241) were invited to participate. The obstetricians were randomized to three groups: direct mail (DM, n = 76), AD (n = 76) and control (C, n = 89, no intervention). Those in the DM group were sent guidelines on GBS. The AD group received the guidelines and an educational visit detailing the guidelines, which was conducted by a trained physician. Data on obstetrician age, gender, time since graduation, whether patients received GBS screening during pregnancy, and obstetricians who requested screening were collected for all participant obstetricians for 3 months before and after the intervention, using database from the private health insurance information system. RESULTS: Three months post-intervention, the data showed that the proportion of pregnant women screened for GBS was higher in the AD group (25.4%) than in the DM (15.9%) and C (17.7%) groups (P = 0.023). Similar results emerged when the three groups were taken as a cluster (pregnant women and their obstetricians), but the difference was not statistically significant (Poisson regression, P = 0.108). Additionally, when vaginal deliveries were analyzed separately, the proportion screened was higher in the AD group (75%) than in the DM group (41.9%) and the C group (30.4%) (chi-square, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that AD increased the prevalence of GBS screening in pregnant women in this population. BioMed Central 2013-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3610286/ /pubmed/23510061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-68 Text en Copyright ©2013 Silva et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Silva, Jussara M Stein, Airton T Schünemann, Holger J Bordin, Ronaldo Kuchenbecker, Ricardo de Lourdes Drachler, Maria Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for Group B streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | academic detailing and adherence to guidelines for group b streptococci prenatal screening: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610286/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvajussaram academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT steinairtont academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schunemannholgerj academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bordinronaldo academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kuchenbeckerricardo academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT delourdesdrachlermaria academicdetailingandadherencetoguidelinesforgroupbstreptococciprenatalscreeningarandomizedcontrolledtrial |