Cargando…

Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance

BACKGROUND: Recent research has addressed the suppression of cortical sensory responses to altered auditory feedback that occurs at utterance onset regarding speech. However, there is reason to assume that the mechanisms underlying sensorimotor processing at mid-utterance are different than those in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhaocong, Jones, Jeffery A., Liu, Peng, Li, Weifeng, Huang, Dongfeng, Liu, Hanjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060039
_version_ 1782264494580301824
author Chen, Zhaocong
Jones, Jeffery A.
Liu, Peng
Li, Weifeng
Huang, Dongfeng
Liu, Hanjun
author_facet Chen, Zhaocong
Jones, Jeffery A.
Liu, Peng
Li, Weifeng
Huang, Dongfeng
Liu, Hanjun
author_sort Chen, Zhaocong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent research has addressed the suppression of cortical sensory responses to altered auditory feedback that occurs at utterance onset regarding speech. However, there is reason to assume that the mechanisms underlying sensorimotor processing at mid-utterance are different than those involved in sensorimotor control at utterance onset. The present study attempted to examine the dynamics of event-related potentials (ERPs) to different acoustic versions of auditory feedback at mid-utterance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Subjects produced a vowel sound while hearing their pitch-shifted voice (100 cents), a sum of their vocalization and pure tones, or a sum of their vocalization and white noise at mid-utterance via headphones. Subjects also passively listened to playback of what they heard during active vocalization. Cortical ERPs were recorded in response to different acoustic versions of feedback changes during both active vocalization and passive listening. The results showed that, relative to passive listening, active vocalization yielded enhanced P2 responses to the 100 cents pitch shifts, whereas suppression effects of P2 responses were observed when voice auditory feedback was distorted by pure tones or white noise. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The present findings, for the first time, demonstrate a dynamic modulation of cortical activity as a function of the quality of acoustic feedback at mid-utterance, suggesting that auditory cortical responses can be enhanced or suppressed to distinguish self-produced speech from externally-produced sounds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3610706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36107062013-04-03 Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance Chen, Zhaocong Jones, Jeffery A. Liu, Peng Li, Weifeng Huang, Dongfeng Liu, Hanjun PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent research has addressed the suppression of cortical sensory responses to altered auditory feedback that occurs at utterance onset regarding speech. However, there is reason to assume that the mechanisms underlying sensorimotor processing at mid-utterance are different than those involved in sensorimotor control at utterance onset. The present study attempted to examine the dynamics of event-related potentials (ERPs) to different acoustic versions of auditory feedback at mid-utterance. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Subjects produced a vowel sound while hearing their pitch-shifted voice (100 cents), a sum of their vocalization and pure tones, or a sum of their vocalization and white noise at mid-utterance via headphones. Subjects also passively listened to playback of what they heard during active vocalization. Cortical ERPs were recorded in response to different acoustic versions of feedback changes during both active vocalization and passive listening. The results showed that, relative to passive listening, active vocalization yielded enhanced P2 responses to the 100 cents pitch shifts, whereas suppression effects of P2 responses were observed when voice auditory feedback was distorted by pure tones or white noise. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The present findings, for the first time, demonstrate a dynamic modulation of cortical activity as a function of the quality of acoustic feedback at mid-utterance, suggesting that auditory cortical responses can be enhanced or suppressed to distinguish self-produced speech from externally-produced sounds. Public Library of Science 2013-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3610706/ /pubmed/23555876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060039 Text en © 2013 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Zhaocong
Jones, Jeffery A.
Liu, Peng
Li, Weifeng
Huang, Dongfeng
Liu, Hanjun
Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance
title Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance
title_full Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance
title_fullStr Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance
title_short Dynamics of Vocalization-Induced Modulation of Auditory Cortical Activity at Mid-utterance
title_sort dynamics of vocalization-induced modulation of auditory cortical activity at mid-utterance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3610706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23555876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060039
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhaocong dynamicsofvocalizationinducedmodulationofauditorycorticalactivityatmidutterance
AT jonesjefferya dynamicsofvocalizationinducedmodulationofauditorycorticalactivityatmidutterance
AT liupeng dynamicsofvocalizationinducedmodulationofauditorycorticalactivityatmidutterance
AT liweifeng dynamicsofvocalizationinducedmodulationofauditorycorticalactivityatmidutterance
AT huangdongfeng dynamicsofvocalizationinducedmodulationofauditorycorticalactivityatmidutterance
AT liuhanjun dynamicsofvocalizationinducedmodulationofauditorycorticalactivityatmidutterance