Cargando…
What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressive...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644864 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)R02 |
_version_ | 1782264590879424512 |
---|---|
author | de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa Silva, Gustavo Bersani de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil Junior, Rames Mattar de Camargo, Olavo Pires |
author_facet | de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa Silva, Gustavo Bersani de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil Junior, Rames Mattar de Camargo, Olavo Pires |
author_sort | de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressively. Looking back over the last 20 years, it can be seen that the entire approach, from diagnosis to treatment, has changed significantly. Some concepts have become better established, while others have been introduced; thus, it can be said that currently, something can always be offered in terms of functional recovery, regardless of the degree of injury. Advances in microsurgical techniques have enabled improved results after neurolysis and have made it possible to perform neurotization, which has undoubtedly become the greatest differential in treating brachial plexus injuries. Improvements in imaging devices and electrical studies have allowed quick decisions that are reflected in better surgical outcomes. In this review, we intend to show the many developments in brachial plexus surgery that have significantly changed the results and have provided hope to the victims of this serious injury. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3611894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36118942013-04-05 What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa Silva, Gustavo Bersani de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil Junior, Rames Mattar de Camargo, Olavo Pires Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressively. Looking back over the last 20 years, it can be seen that the entire approach, from diagnosis to treatment, has changed significantly. Some concepts have become better established, while others have been introduced; thus, it can be said that currently, something can always be offered in terms of functional recovery, regardless of the degree of injury. Advances in microsurgical techniques have enabled improved results after neurolysis and have made it possible to perform neurotization, which has undoubtedly become the greatest differential in treating brachial plexus injuries. Improvements in imaging devices and electrical studies have allowed quick decisions that are reflected in better surgical outcomes. In this review, we intend to show the many developments in brachial plexus surgery that have significantly changed the results and have provided hope to the victims of this serious injury. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3611894/ /pubmed/23644864 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)R02 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa Silva, Gustavo Bersani de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil Junior, Rames Mattar de Camargo, Olavo Pires What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
title | What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
title_full | What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
title_fullStr | What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
title_full_unstemmed | What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
title_short | What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
title_sort | what has changed in brachial plexus surgery? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644864 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)R02 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derezendemarcelorosa whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery AT silvagustavobersani whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery AT depaulaemygdiojoseleomil whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery AT juniorramesmattar whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery AT decamargoolavopires whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery |