Cargando…

What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?

Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa, Silva, Gustavo Bersani, de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil, Junior, Rames Mattar, de Camargo, Olavo Pires
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644864
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)R02
_version_ 1782264590879424512
author de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa
Silva, Gustavo Bersani
de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil
Junior, Rames Mattar
de Camargo, Olavo Pires
author_facet de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa
Silva, Gustavo Bersani
de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil
Junior, Rames Mattar
de Camargo, Olavo Pires
author_sort de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa
collection PubMed
description Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressively. Looking back over the last 20 years, it can be seen that the entire approach, from diagnosis to treatment, has changed significantly. Some concepts have become better established, while others have been introduced; thus, it can be said that currently, something can always be offered in terms of functional recovery, regardless of the degree of injury. Advances in microsurgical techniques have enabled improved results after neurolysis and have made it possible to perform neurotization, which has undoubtedly become the greatest differential in treating brachial plexus injuries. Improvements in imaging devices and electrical studies have allowed quick decisions that are reflected in better surgical outcomes. In this review, we intend to show the many developments in brachial plexus surgery that have significantly changed the results and have provided hope to the victims of this serious injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3611894
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36118942013-04-05 What has changed in brachial plexus surgery? de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa Silva, Gustavo Bersani de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil Junior, Rames Mattar de Camargo, Olavo Pires Clinics (Sao Paulo) Review Brachial plexus injuries, in all their severity and complexity, have been extensively studied. Although brachial plexus injuries are associated with serious and often definitive sequelae, many concepts have changed since the 1950s, when this pathological condition began to be treated more aggressively. Looking back over the last 20 years, it can be seen that the entire approach, from diagnosis to treatment, has changed significantly. Some concepts have become better established, while others have been introduced; thus, it can be said that currently, something can always be offered in terms of functional recovery, regardless of the degree of injury. Advances in microsurgical techniques have enabled improved results after neurolysis and have made it possible to perform neurotization, which has undoubtedly become the greatest differential in treating brachial plexus injuries. Improvements in imaging devices and electrical studies have allowed quick decisions that are reflected in better surgical outcomes. In this review, we intend to show the many developments in brachial plexus surgery that have significantly changed the results and have provided hope to the victims of this serious injury. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3611894/ /pubmed/23644864 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)R02 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
de Rezende, Marcelo Rosa
Silva, Gustavo Bersani
de Paula, Emygdio José Leomil
Junior, Rames Mattar
de Camargo, Olavo Pires
What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
title What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
title_full What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
title_fullStr What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
title_full_unstemmed What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
title_short What has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
title_sort what has changed in brachial plexus surgery?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611894/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644864
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)R02
work_keys_str_mv AT derezendemarcelorosa whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery
AT silvagustavobersani whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery
AT depaulaemygdiojoseleomil whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery
AT juniorramesmattar whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery
AT decamargoolavopires whathaschangedinbrachialplexussurgery