Cargando…

Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether risk scores used to classify patients with primary myelofibrosis and JAK-2 V617F mutation status can predict clinical outcome. METHODS: A review of clinical and laboratory data from 74 patients with primary myelofibrosis diagnosed between 1992 and 2011. The IPSS and L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benites, Bruno Deltreggia, Lima, Carolina Silva Costa, Lorand-Metze, Irene, Delamain, Marcia Torresan, Oliveira, Gislaine Borba, de Almeida, Daiane, de Souza, Carmino Antonio, Vassallo, Jose, Pagnano, Katia Borgia Barbosa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644853
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)OA09
_version_ 1782264591801122816
author Benites, Bruno Deltreggia
Lima, Carolina Silva Costa
Lorand-Metze, Irene
Delamain, Marcia Torresan
Oliveira, Gislaine Borba
de Almeida, Daiane
de Souza, Carmino Antonio
Vassallo, Jose
Pagnano, Katia Borgia Barbosa
author_facet Benites, Bruno Deltreggia
Lima, Carolina Silva Costa
Lorand-Metze, Irene
Delamain, Marcia Torresan
Oliveira, Gislaine Borba
de Almeida, Daiane
de Souza, Carmino Antonio
Vassallo, Jose
Pagnano, Katia Borgia Barbosa
author_sort Benites, Bruno Deltreggia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether risk scores used to classify patients with primary myelofibrosis and JAK-2 V617F mutation status can predict clinical outcome. METHODS: A review of clinical and laboratory data from 74 patients with primary myelofibrosis diagnosed between 1992 and 2011. The IPSS and Lille scores were calculated for risk stratification and correlated with overall survival. RESULTS: A V617F JAK2 mutation was detected in 32 cases (47%), with no significant correlation with overall survival. The patients were classified according to the scores: Lille - low, 53 (73.%); intermediate, 13 (18%); and high, 5 (7%); and IPSS – low, 15 (26%); intermediate-1, 23 (32%); intermediate-2, 19 (26%); and high, 15 (31%). Those patients presenting a higher risk according to the IPSS (high and intermediate-2) had a significantly shorter overall survival relative to the low risk groups (intermediate-1 and low) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the importance of the IPSS prognostic score for risk assessment in predicting the clinical outcome of primary myelofibrosis patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3611898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36118982013-04-05 Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome Benites, Bruno Deltreggia Lima, Carolina Silva Costa Lorand-Metze, Irene Delamain, Marcia Torresan Oliveira, Gislaine Borba de Almeida, Daiane de Souza, Carmino Antonio Vassallo, Jose Pagnano, Katia Borgia Barbosa Clinics (Sao Paulo) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether risk scores used to classify patients with primary myelofibrosis and JAK-2 V617F mutation status can predict clinical outcome. METHODS: A review of clinical and laboratory data from 74 patients with primary myelofibrosis diagnosed between 1992 and 2011. The IPSS and Lille scores were calculated for risk stratification and correlated with overall survival. RESULTS: A V617F JAK2 mutation was detected in 32 cases (47%), with no significant correlation with overall survival. The patients were classified according to the scores: Lille - low, 53 (73.%); intermediate, 13 (18%); and high, 5 (7%); and IPSS – low, 15 (26%); intermediate-1, 23 (32%); intermediate-2, 19 (26%); and high, 15 (31%). Those patients presenting a higher risk according to the IPSS (high and intermediate-2) had a significantly shorter overall survival relative to the low risk groups (intermediate-1 and low) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasize the importance of the IPSS prognostic score for risk assessment in predicting the clinical outcome of primary myelofibrosis patients. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3611898/ /pubmed/23644853 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)OA09 Text en Copyright © 2013 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Benites, Bruno Deltreggia
Lima, Carolina Silva Costa
Lorand-Metze, Irene
Delamain, Marcia Torresan
Oliveira, Gislaine Borba
de Almeida, Daiane
de Souza, Carmino Antonio
Vassallo, Jose
Pagnano, Katia Borgia Barbosa
Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
title Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
title_full Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
title_fullStr Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
title_full_unstemmed Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
title_short Primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by IPSS identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
title_sort primary myelofibrosis: risk stratification by ipss identifies patients with poor clinical outcome
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3611898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23644853
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(03)OA09
work_keys_str_mv AT benitesbrunodeltreggia primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT limacarolinasilvacosta primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT lorandmetzeirene primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT delamainmarciatorresan primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT oliveiragislaineborba primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT dealmeidadaiane primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT desouzacarminoantonio primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT vassallojose primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome
AT pagnanokatiaborgiabarbosa primarymyelofibrosisriskstratificationbyipssidentifiespatientswithpoorclinicaloutcome