Cargando…

Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria

BACKGROUND: It has been stated that the bone allografts from different tissue banks may lead to various amount of bone induction, so the aim of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration of three demineralized allografts both histologically and histomorphometrically in rabbits calvaria bone defect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behfarnia, Parichehr, Shahabooei, Mohammad, Mashhadiabbas, Fatemeh, Fakhari, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559919
_version_ 1782264628543225856
author Behfarnia, Parichehr
Shahabooei, Mohammad
Mashhadiabbas, Fatemeh
Fakhari, Elham
author_facet Behfarnia, Parichehr
Shahabooei, Mohammad
Mashhadiabbas, Fatemeh
Fakhari, Elham
author_sort Behfarnia, Parichehr
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been stated that the bone allografts from different tissue banks may lead to various amount of bone induction, so the aim of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration of three demineralized allografts both histologically and histomorphometrically in rabbits calvaria bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized experimental animal study, 32 critical size defects (11-mm diameter) in the calvaria of 16 male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly filled with three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DBM, CENOBONE, DEMBONE), while the nongrafted defect was regarded as control group. After 6 and 12 weeks of healing, the experimental animals were euthanized for specimen preparation. After histological evaluation, histomorphometric analysis was performed to quantify new bone formation and remained graft particles. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's ad-hoc test and t-test. (P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant). RESULTS: Mean percentage of bone formation increased between two healing time, but it was not statistically significant in all groups except DBM which the bone formation significantly decreased (P = 0.04). There were not statistically significant differences between three allografts in remained particles and bone formation in both healing times and they could not induce significantly more bone formation than control group. CONCLUSION: Both test and control groups resulted in successful new bone formation. No difference was noted in bone formation and remained particles between three commercial bone allografts. Further studies in this issue may be needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36121912013-04-04 Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria Behfarnia, Parichehr Shahabooei, Mohammad Mashhadiabbas, Fatemeh Fakhari, Elham Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: It has been stated that the bone allografts from different tissue banks may lead to various amount of bone induction, so the aim of this study was to evaluate bone regeneration of three demineralized allografts both histologically and histomorphometrically in rabbits calvaria bone defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind randomized experimental animal study, 32 critical size defects (11-mm diameter) in the calvaria of 16 male New Zealand white rabbits were randomly filled with three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts (DBM, CENOBONE, DEMBONE), while the nongrafted defect was regarded as control group. After 6 and 12 weeks of healing, the experimental animals were euthanized for specimen preparation. After histological evaluation, histomorphometric analysis was performed to quantify new bone formation and remained graft particles. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's ad-hoc test and t-test. (P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant). RESULTS: Mean percentage of bone formation increased between two healing time, but it was not statistically significant in all groups except DBM which the bone formation significantly decreased (P = 0.04). There were not statistically significant differences between three allografts in remained particles and bone formation in both healing times and they could not induce significantly more bone formation than control group. CONCLUSION: Both test and control groups resulted in successful new bone formation. No difference was noted in bone formation and remained particles between three commercial bone allografts. Further studies in this issue may be needed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3612191/ /pubmed/23559919 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Behfarnia, Parichehr
Shahabooei, Mohammad
Mashhadiabbas, Fatemeh
Fakhari, Elham
Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
title Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
title_full Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
title_fullStr Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
title_short Comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: A histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
title_sort comparison of bone regeneration using three demineralized freeze-dried bone allografts: a histological and histomorphometric study in rabbit calvaria
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559919
work_keys_str_mv AT behfarniaparichehr comparisonofboneregenerationusingthreedemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftsahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyinrabbitcalvaria
AT shahabooeimohammad comparisonofboneregenerationusingthreedemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftsahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyinrabbitcalvaria
AT mashhadiabbasfatemeh comparisonofboneregenerationusingthreedemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftsahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyinrabbitcalvaria
AT fakharielham comparisonofboneregenerationusingthreedemineralizedfreezedriedboneallograftsahistologicalandhistomorphometricstudyinrabbitcalvaria