Cargando…

A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives

BACKGROUND: Composite resin restorations may have a short lifespan due to the degradation of resin–dentin interface. Ethanol wet bonding technique may extend the longevity of resin–dentin bond. The purpose of this one year randomized clinical trial was to compare clinical performance of two adhesive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mortazavi, Vajihesadat, Samimi, Pouran, Rafizadeh, Mojgan, Kazemi, Shantia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559924
_version_ 1782264629676736512
author Mortazavi, Vajihesadat
Samimi, Pouran
Rafizadeh, Mojgan
Kazemi, Shantia
author_facet Mortazavi, Vajihesadat
Samimi, Pouran
Rafizadeh, Mojgan
Kazemi, Shantia
author_sort Mortazavi, Vajihesadat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Composite resin restorations may have a short lifespan due to the degradation of resin–dentin interface. Ethanol wet bonding technique may extend the longevity of resin–dentin bond. The purpose of this one year randomized clinical trial was to compare clinical performance of two adhesives with ethanol wet bonding technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 36 non-carious cervical lesions in 12 patients restored with composite resin using one of the following approaches: 1. OptiBond FL (Kerr, USA); 2. Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) with enamel etching and 3. Ethanol wet bonding technique with the part of adhesive of OptiBond FL. The clinical success rate was assessed after 24 h, 6, 9 and 12 months according to the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria: Marginal discoloration, marginal defect, retention rate, caries occurrence, and postoperative sensitivity. The tooth vitality was also assessed. RESULTS: The retention rate was 100% at baseline and at 6 months follow up for all types of bonding protocols and was 91.67% at 9 and 12 months follow up for ethanol wet bonding group. None of the restorations in three groups showed marginal defects, marginal discoloration or caries occurrence and were vital after 12 months. There was no statistically significant difference between three groups after 12 months follow up (p value = 0.358). CONCLUSIONS: Composite restorations placed using ethanol wet bonding technique presented equal performance to the other groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36121962013-04-04 A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives Mortazavi, Vajihesadat Samimi, Pouran Rafizadeh, Mojgan Kazemi, Shantia Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Composite resin restorations may have a short lifespan due to the degradation of resin–dentin interface. Ethanol wet bonding technique may extend the longevity of resin–dentin bond. The purpose of this one year randomized clinical trial was to compare clinical performance of two adhesives with ethanol wet bonding technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed on 36 non-carious cervical lesions in 12 patients restored with composite resin using one of the following approaches: 1. OptiBond FL (Kerr, USA); 2. Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray, Japan) with enamel etching and 3. Ethanol wet bonding technique with the part of adhesive of OptiBond FL. The clinical success rate was assessed after 24 h, 6, 9 and 12 months according to the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria: Marginal discoloration, marginal defect, retention rate, caries occurrence, and postoperative sensitivity. The tooth vitality was also assessed. RESULTS: The retention rate was 100% at baseline and at 6 months follow up for all types of bonding protocols and was 91.67% at 9 and 12 months follow up for ethanol wet bonding group. None of the restorations in three groups showed marginal defects, marginal discoloration or caries occurrence and were vital after 12 months. There was no statistically significant difference between three groups after 12 months follow up (p value = 0.358). CONCLUSIONS: Composite restorations placed using ethanol wet bonding technique presented equal performance to the other groups. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3612196/ /pubmed/23559924 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mortazavi, Vajihesadat
Samimi, Pouran
Rafizadeh, Mojgan
Kazemi, Shantia
A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
title A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
title_full A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
title_fullStr A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
title_full_unstemmed A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
title_short A randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
title_sort randomized clinical trial evaluating the success rate of ethanol wet bonding technique and two adhesives
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559924
work_keys_str_mv AT mortazavivajihesadat arandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT samimipouran arandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT rafizadehmojgan arandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT kazemishantia arandomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT mortazavivajihesadat randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT samimipouran randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT rafizadehmojgan randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives
AT kazemishantia randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthesuccessrateofethanolwetbondingtechniqueandtwoadhesives