Cargando…

Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia

BACKGROUND: Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding veneer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rismanchian, Mansour, Shafiei, Soufia, Askari, Navid, Khodaeian, Niloufar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559931
_version_ 1782264631256940544
author Rismanchian, Mansour
Shafiei, Soufia
Askari, Navid
Khodaeian, Niloufar
author_facet Rismanchian, Mansour
Shafiei, Soufia
Askari, Navid
Khodaeian, Niloufar
author_sort Rismanchian, Mansour
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding veneering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconia disks with 7-mm diameter and 3-mm height were prepared (Cercon and Biodenta systems) and veneered with recommended layering ceramics (Cercon ceram and 2 in 1 ceramic, respectively) (n = 10). The disks were polished with diamond paste and airborne-particle abraded before layering. The specimens were mounted in a T-shaped metal holder using autopolymerized acrylic resin and stored in 37°C distilled water for one week, after which they were subjected to thermal cycling. SBS of zirconia core to veneering ceramic was measured using a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined microscopically. Data were analyzed using t test (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Mean (±SD) SBS values were 27.19(±3.43) and 28.22(±4.08) MPa for Cercon and Biodenta systems, respectively, with no significant difference. Biodenta system showed more adhesive failure compared to more combined (adhesive and cohesive) failures in Cercon system. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that SBS of Biodenta and Cercon specimens were nearly the same, but the fracture mode of these two systems were different. Since Biodenta fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive, it seems that maybe Biodenta porcelain was stronger than Cercon porcelain where as its adhesive bond was weaker.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36122032013-04-04 Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia Rismanchian, Mansour Shafiei, Soufia Askari, Navid Khodaeian, Niloufar Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Chip-off fracture of veneering porcelain has been described as the most frequent reason for the failure of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of two commercial zirconia core ceramics to their corresponding veneering ceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zirconia disks with 7-mm diameter and 3-mm height were prepared (Cercon and Biodenta systems) and veneered with recommended layering ceramics (Cercon ceram and 2 in 1 ceramic, respectively) (n = 10). The disks were polished with diamond paste and airborne-particle abraded before layering. The specimens were mounted in a T-shaped metal holder using autopolymerized acrylic resin and stored in 37°C distilled water for one week, after which they were subjected to thermal cycling. SBS of zirconia core to veneering ceramic was measured using a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined microscopically. Data were analyzed using t test (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Mean (±SD) SBS values were 27.19(±3.43) and 28.22(±4.08) MPa for Cercon and Biodenta systems, respectively, with no significant difference. Biodenta system showed more adhesive failure compared to more combined (adhesive and cohesive) failures in Cercon system. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study it can be concluded that SBS of Biodenta and Cercon specimens were nearly the same, but the fracture mode of these two systems were different. Since Biodenta fracture pattern was predominantly adhesive, it seems that maybe Biodenta porcelain was stronger than Cercon porcelain where as its adhesive bond was weaker. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3612203/ /pubmed/23559931 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rismanchian, Mansour
Shafiei, Soufia
Askari, Navid
Khodaeian, Niloufar
Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of two veneering ceramics to zirconia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559931
work_keys_str_mv AT rismanchianmansour comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
AT shafieisoufia comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
AT askarinavid comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia
AT khodaeianniloufar comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoveneeringceramicstozirconia