Cargando…

Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University

BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) recording is the most commonly measured clinical parameter. Standing mercury sphygmomanometer is the most widely used equipment to record this. However, recording by sphygmomanometer is subject to observer and instrumental error. The different sources of equipment err...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mishra, Badrinarayan, Sinha, Nidhi Dinesh, Gidwani, Hitesh, Shukla, Sushil Kumar, Kawatra, Abhishek, Mehta, SC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559698
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.106622
_version_ 1782264640874479616
author Mishra, Badrinarayan
Sinha, Nidhi Dinesh
Gidwani, Hitesh
Shukla, Sushil Kumar
Kawatra, Abhishek
Mehta, SC
author_facet Mishra, Badrinarayan
Sinha, Nidhi Dinesh
Gidwani, Hitesh
Shukla, Sushil Kumar
Kawatra, Abhishek
Mehta, SC
author_sort Mishra, Badrinarayan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) recording is the most commonly measured clinical parameter. Standing mercury sphygmomanometer is the most widely used equipment to record this. However, recording by sphygmomanometer is subject to observer and instrumental error. The different sources of equipment error are faulty manometer tube calibration, baseline deviations and improper arm bladder cuff dimensions. This is further compounded by a high prevalence of arm bladder miss-cuffing in the target population. OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to assess the presence of equipment malcalibrations, cuff miss-matching and their effect on BP recording. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional check of all operational sphygmomanometers in a health university was carried out for the length of the manometer tube, deviation of resting mercury column from “0” level, the width and length of arm bladder cuff and extent of bladder cuff-mismatch with respect to outpatient attending population. RESULTS: From the total of 50 apparatus selected, 39 (78%) were from hospital setups and 11 (22%) from pre-clinical departments. A manometer height deficit of 13 mm was recorded in 36 (92.23%) of the equipment in hospital and 11 (100%) from pre-clinical departments. Instruments from both settings showed significant deviation from recommended dimensions in cuff bladder length, width and length to width ratio (P < 0.001). Significant number of apparatus from hospital setups showed presence of mercury manometer baseline deviation either below or above 0 mmHg at the resting state (χ(2) = 5.61, D. F. = 1, P = 0.02). Positive corelationship was observed between manometer height deficit, baseline deviation and width of arm cuff bladder (Pearson correlation, P < 0.05). Bladder cuff mismatching in response to the target population was found at 48.52% for males and 36.76% for females. The cumulative effect of these factors can lead to an error in the range of 10-12 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Faulty equipments and prevalent arm bladder cuff-mismatching can be important barriers to accurate BP measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36122912013-04-04 Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University Mishra, Badrinarayan Sinha, Nidhi Dinesh Gidwani, Hitesh Shukla, Sushil Kumar Kawatra, Abhishek Mehta, SC Indian J Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) recording is the most commonly measured clinical parameter. Standing mercury sphygmomanometer is the most widely used equipment to record this. However, recording by sphygmomanometer is subject to observer and instrumental error. The different sources of equipment error are faulty manometer tube calibration, baseline deviations and improper arm bladder cuff dimensions. This is further compounded by a high prevalence of arm bladder miss-cuffing in the target population. OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to assess the presence of equipment malcalibrations, cuff miss-matching and their effect on BP recording. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional check of all operational sphygmomanometers in a health university was carried out for the length of the manometer tube, deviation of resting mercury column from “0” level, the width and length of arm bladder cuff and extent of bladder cuff-mismatch with respect to outpatient attending population. RESULTS: From the total of 50 apparatus selected, 39 (78%) were from hospital setups and 11 (22%) from pre-clinical departments. A manometer height deficit of 13 mm was recorded in 36 (92.23%) of the equipment in hospital and 11 (100%) from pre-clinical departments. Instruments from both settings showed significant deviation from recommended dimensions in cuff bladder length, width and length to width ratio (P < 0.001). Significant number of apparatus from hospital setups showed presence of mercury manometer baseline deviation either below or above 0 mmHg at the resting state (χ(2) = 5.61, D. F. = 1, P = 0.02). Positive corelationship was observed between manometer height deficit, baseline deviation and width of arm cuff bladder (Pearson correlation, P < 0.05). Bladder cuff mismatching in response to the target population was found at 48.52% for males and 36.76% for females. The cumulative effect of these factors can lead to an error in the range of 10-12 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Faulty equipments and prevalent arm bladder cuff-mismatching can be important barriers to accurate BP measurement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3612291/ /pubmed/23559698 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.106622 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Community Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mishra, Badrinarayan
Sinha, Nidhi Dinesh
Gidwani, Hitesh
Shukla, Sushil Kumar
Kawatra, Abhishek
Mehta, SC
Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University
title Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University
title_full Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University
title_fullStr Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University
title_full_unstemmed Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University
title_short Equipment Errors: A Prevalent Cause for Fallacy in Blood Pressure Recording - A Point Prevalence Estimate from an Indian Health University
title_sort equipment errors: a prevalent cause for fallacy in blood pressure recording - a point prevalence estimate from an indian health university
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559698
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-0218.106622
work_keys_str_mv AT mishrabadrinarayan equipmenterrorsaprevalentcauseforfallacyinbloodpressurerecordingapointprevalenceestimatefromanindianhealthuniversity
AT sinhanidhidinesh equipmenterrorsaprevalentcauseforfallacyinbloodpressurerecordingapointprevalenceestimatefromanindianhealthuniversity
AT gidwanihitesh equipmenterrorsaprevalentcauseforfallacyinbloodpressurerecordingapointprevalenceestimatefromanindianhealthuniversity
AT shuklasushilkumar equipmenterrorsaprevalentcauseforfallacyinbloodpressurerecordingapointprevalenceestimatefromanindianhealthuniversity
AT kawatraabhishek equipmenterrorsaprevalentcauseforfallacyinbloodpressurerecordingapointprevalenceestimatefromanindianhealthuniversity
AT mehtasc equipmenterrorsaprevalentcauseforfallacyinbloodpressurerecordingapointprevalenceestimatefromanindianhealthuniversity