Cargando…

Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task

Repetitive performance of a task can result in learning. The neural mechanisms underpinning such use-dependent plasticity are influenced by several neuromodulators. Variations in neuromodulator levels may contribute to the variability in performance outcomes following training. Circulating levels of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sale, Martin V., Ridding, Michael C., Nordstrom, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/396865
_version_ 1782264666389479424
author Sale, Martin V.
Ridding, Michael C.
Nordstrom, Michael A.
author_facet Sale, Martin V.
Ridding, Michael C.
Nordstrom, Michael A.
author_sort Sale, Martin V.
collection PubMed
description Repetitive performance of a task can result in learning. The neural mechanisms underpinning such use-dependent plasticity are influenced by several neuromodulators. Variations in neuromodulator levels may contribute to the variability in performance outcomes following training. Circulating levels of the neuromodulator cortisol change throughout the day. High cortisol levels inhibit neuroplasticity induced with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm that has similarities to use-dependent plasticity. The present study investigated whether performance changes following a motor training task are modulated by time of day and/or changes in endogenous cortisol levels. Motor training involving 30 minutes of repeated maximum left thumb abduction was undertaken by twenty-two participants twice, once in the morning (8 AM) and once in the evening (8 PM) on separate occasions. Saliva was assayed for cortisol concentration. Motor performance, quantified by measuring maximum left thumb abduction acceleration, significantly increased by 28% following training. Neuroplastic changes in corticomotor excitability of abductor pollicis brevis, quantified with TMS, increased significantly by 23% following training. Training-related motor performance improvements and neuroplasticity were unaffected by time of day and salivary cortisol concentration. Although similar neural elements and processes contribute to motor learning, training-induced neuroplasticity, and TMS-induced neuroplasticity, our findings suggest that the influence of time of day and cortisol differs for these three interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36124842013-04-10 Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task Sale, Martin V. Ridding, Michael C. Nordstrom, Michael A. Neural Plast Research Article Repetitive performance of a task can result in learning. The neural mechanisms underpinning such use-dependent plasticity are influenced by several neuromodulators. Variations in neuromodulator levels may contribute to the variability in performance outcomes following training. Circulating levels of the neuromodulator cortisol change throughout the day. High cortisol levels inhibit neuroplasticity induced with a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm that has similarities to use-dependent plasticity. The present study investigated whether performance changes following a motor training task are modulated by time of day and/or changes in endogenous cortisol levels. Motor training involving 30 minutes of repeated maximum left thumb abduction was undertaken by twenty-two participants twice, once in the morning (8 AM) and once in the evening (8 PM) on separate occasions. Saliva was assayed for cortisol concentration. Motor performance, quantified by measuring maximum left thumb abduction acceleration, significantly increased by 28% following training. Neuroplastic changes in corticomotor excitability of abductor pollicis brevis, quantified with TMS, increased significantly by 23% following training. Training-related motor performance improvements and neuroplasticity were unaffected by time of day and salivary cortisol concentration. Although similar neural elements and processes contribute to motor learning, training-induced neuroplasticity, and TMS-induced neuroplasticity, our findings suggest that the influence of time of day and cortisol differs for these three interventions. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3612484/ /pubmed/23577271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/396865 Text en Copyright © 2013 Martin V. Sale et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sale, Martin V.
Ridding, Michael C.
Nordstrom, Michael A.
Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task
title Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task
title_full Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task
title_fullStr Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task
title_full_unstemmed Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task
title_short Time of Day Does Not Modulate Improvements in Motor Performance following a Repetitive Ballistic Motor Training Task
title_sort time of day does not modulate improvements in motor performance following a repetitive ballistic motor training task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/396865
work_keys_str_mv AT salemartinv timeofdaydoesnotmodulateimprovementsinmotorperformancefollowingarepetitiveballisticmotortrainingtask
AT riddingmichaelc timeofdaydoesnotmodulateimprovementsinmotorperformancefollowingarepetitiveballisticmotortrainingtask
AT nordstrommichaela timeofdaydoesnotmodulateimprovementsinmotorperformancefollowingarepetitiveballisticmotortrainingtask