Cargando…

Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND: Palonosetron (Aloxi®, Onicit®) is a pharmacologically unique 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist (RA) approved as a single IV injection for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy (CINV) of either moderate or highly emetogenic potential (MEC and HEC, respectively). An oral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boccia, Ralph, Grunberg, Steven, Franco-Gonzales, Edwin, Rubenstein, Edward, Voisin, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23354552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1691-5
_version_ 1782264669796302848
author Boccia, Ralph
Grunberg, Steven
Franco-Gonzales, Edwin
Rubenstein, Edward
Voisin, Daniel
author_facet Boccia, Ralph
Grunberg, Steven
Franco-Gonzales, Edwin
Rubenstein, Edward
Voisin, Daniel
author_sort Boccia, Ralph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Palonosetron (Aloxi®, Onicit®) is a pharmacologically unique 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist (RA) approved as a single IV injection for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy (CINV) of either moderate or highly emetogenic potential (MEC and HEC, respectively). An oral palonosetron formulation has been developed and compared to the IV formulation. METHODS: In this multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-ranging trial, 651 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following as a single dose prior to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: oral palonosetron 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg or IV palonosetron 0.25 mg. Patients were also randomized (1:1) to receive dexamethasone 8 mg IV or matched placebo on day 1. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis, no rescue therapy) during the acute phase (0–24 h). RESULTS: Acute CR rates were 73.5, 76.3, 74.1, and 70.4 % for all patients receiving the palonosetron 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg oral doses, and for IV palonosetron 0.25 mg, respectively; delayed CR (24–120 h) rates were 59.4, 62.5, 60.1, and 65.4 %, and overall CR (0–120 h) rates were 53.5, 58.8, 53.2, and 59.3 %, respectively. The addition of dexamethasone improved emetic control (acute CR rate) by at least 15 % for all groups except oral palonosetron 0.25 mg, where the acute CR improvement was approximately 7 %. Adverse events were similar in nature, incidence, and intensity for all oral and IV palonosetron groups, and were the expected adverse events for 5-HT(3) RAs (primarily headache and constipation). CONCLUSION: Oral palonosetron has a similar efficacy and safety profile as IV palonosetron 0.25 mg and may be the preferred formulation in certain clinical situations. Among the tested oral treatments, a palonosetron 0.50-mg oral dose has been favored for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy due to a numerical gain in efficacy without a side effect disadvantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36125852013-04-02 Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial Boccia, Ralph Grunberg, Steven Franco-Gonzales, Edwin Rubenstein, Edward Voisin, Daniel Support Care Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: Palonosetron (Aloxi®, Onicit®) is a pharmacologically unique 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist (RA) approved as a single IV injection for the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by chemotherapy (CINV) of either moderate or highly emetogenic potential (MEC and HEC, respectively). An oral palonosetron formulation has been developed and compared to the IV formulation. METHODS: In this multinational, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, dose-ranging trial, 651 patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following as a single dose prior to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: oral palonosetron 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg or IV palonosetron 0.25 mg. Patients were also randomized (1:1) to receive dexamethasone 8 mg IV or matched placebo on day 1. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis, no rescue therapy) during the acute phase (0–24 h). RESULTS: Acute CR rates were 73.5, 76.3, 74.1, and 70.4 % for all patients receiving the palonosetron 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg oral doses, and for IV palonosetron 0.25 mg, respectively; delayed CR (24–120 h) rates were 59.4, 62.5, 60.1, and 65.4 %, and overall CR (0–120 h) rates were 53.5, 58.8, 53.2, and 59.3 %, respectively. The addition of dexamethasone improved emetic control (acute CR rate) by at least 15 % for all groups except oral palonosetron 0.25 mg, where the acute CR improvement was approximately 7 %. Adverse events were similar in nature, incidence, and intensity for all oral and IV palonosetron groups, and were the expected adverse events for 5-HT(3) RAs (primarily headache and constipation). CONCLUSION: Oral palonosetron has a similar efficacy and safety profile as IV palonosetron 0.25 mg and may be the preferred formulation in certain clinical situations. Among the tested oral treatments, a palonosetron 0.50-mg oral dose has been favored for the prevention of CINV in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy due to a numerical gain in efficacy without a side effect disadvantage. Springer-Verlag 2013-01-26 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3612585/ /pubmed/23354552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1691-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Boccia, Ralph
Grunberg, Steven
Franco-Gonzales, Edwin
Rubenstein, Edward
Voisin, Daniel
Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
title Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
title_full Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
title_short Efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
title_sort efficacy of oral palonosetron compared to intravenous palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase 3 trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23354552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1691-5
work_keys_str_mv AT bocciaralph efficacyoforalpalonosetroncomparedtointravenouspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyemetogenicchemotherapyaphase3trial
AT grunbergsteven efficacyoforalpalonosetroncomparedtointravenouspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyemetogenicchemotherapyaphase3trial
AT francogonzalesedwin efficacyoforalpalonosetroncomparedtointravenouspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyemetogenicchemotherapyaphase3trial
AT rubensteinedward efficacyoforalpalonosetroncomparedtointravenouspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyemetogenicchemotherapyaphase3trial
AT voisindaniel efficacyoforalpalonosetroncomparedtointravenouspalonosetronforthepreventionofchemotherapyinducednauseaandvomitingassociatedwithmoderatelyemetogenicchemotherapyaphase3trial