Cargando…

Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups

PURPOSE: The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazanjian, Arminee, Smillie, Kirsten, Stephen, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2
_version_ 1782264670021746688
author Kazanjian, Arminee
Smillie, Kirsten
Stephen, Joanne
author_facet Kazanjian, Arminee
Smillie, Kirsten
Stephen, Joanne
author_sort Kazanjian, Arminee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for cancer survivors and (2) facilitating the implementation of this intervention by a select group of end users—decision makers and clinical leads in psychosocial supportive care. METHODS: The KE–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model, operationalizing the Health Technology Approach, guided the development of pre- and postworkshop questionnaires, and a follow-up questionnaire administered 5 months after the workshop. Questionnaire results were categorized according to participants’ responses to these elements: methods of engagement, evidence (scientific, experiential, systems) and the delivery of this evidence, and external factors at the institutional level, such as administrative support, budgetary issues, etc., that influence decision-maker abilities and strategies. RESULTS: Traditional KE strategies such as peer-reviewed journal articles are optimal for disseminating scientific evidence, while face-to-face interactions, such as in a workshop, are best used to disseminate systems-level implementation information, such as fiscal implications, budgetary requirements, and policy relevance, which is not found in journal articles or conferences. An apparent shift in workplace culture signifies the availability of institutional support for high-level staff to engage in KE. CONCLUSIONS: As a KE strategy with identified end users, the workshop format is effective in facilitating the implementation of this intervention in participants’ institutions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36125862013-04-02 Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups Kazanjian, Arminee Smillie, Kirsten Stephen, Joanne Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for cancer survivors and (2) facilitating the implementation of this intervention by a select group of end users—decision makers and clinical leads in psychosocial supportive care. METHODS: The KE–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model, operationalizing the Health Technology Approach, guided the development of pre- and postworkshop questionnaires, and a follow-up questionnaire administered 5 months after the workshop. Questionnaire results were categorized according to participants’ responses to these elements: methods of engagement, evidence (scientific, experiential, systems) and the delivery of this evidence, and external factors at the institutional level, such as administrative support, budgetary issues, etc., that influence decision-maker abilities and strategies. RESULTS: Traditional KE strategies such as peer-reviewed journal articles are optimal for disseminating scientific evidence, while face-to-face interactions, such as in a workshop, are best used to disseminate systems-level implementation information, such as fiscal implications, budgetary requirements, and policy relevance, which is not found in journal articles or conferences. An apparent shift in workplace culture signifies the availability of institutional support for high-level staff to engage in KE. CONCLUSIONS: As a KE strategy with identified end users, the workshop format is effective in facilitating the implementation of this intervention in participants’ institutions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-12-29 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3612586/ /pubmed/23274924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kazanjian, Arminee
Smillie, Kirsten
Stephen, Joanne
Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
title Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
title_full Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
title_fullStr Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
title_short Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
title_sort evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of online support groups
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274924
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kazanjianarminee evaluatingaknowledgeexchangeinterventionincancersurvivorshipcareaworkshoptofosterimplementationofonlinesupportgroups
AT smilliekirsten evaluatingaknowledgeexchangeinterventionincancersurvivorshipcareaworkshoptofosterimplementationofonlinesupportgroups
AT stephenjoanne evaluatingaknowledgeexchangeinterventionincancersurvivorshipcareaworkshoptofosterimplementationofonlinesupportgroups