Cargando…
Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups
PURPOSE: The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2 |
_version_ | 1782264670021746688 |
---|---|
author | Kazanjian, Arminee Smillie, Kirsten Stephen, Joanne |
author_facet | Kazanjian, Arminee Smillie, Kirsten Stephen, Joanne |
author_sort | Kazanjian, Arminee |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for cancer survivors and (2) facilitating the implementation of this intervention by a select group of end users—decision makers and clinical leads in psychosocial supportive care. METHODS: The KE–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model, operationalizing the Health Technology Approach, guided the development of pre- and postworkshop questionnaires, and a follow-up questionnaire administered 5 months after the workshop. Questionnaire results were categorized according to participants’ responses to these elements: methods of engagement, evidence (scientific, experiential, systems) and the delivery of this evidence, and external factors at the institutional level, such as administrative support, budgetary issues, etc., that influence decision-maker abilities and strategies. RESULTS: Traditional KE strategies such as peer-reviewed journal articles are optimal for disseminating scientific evidence, while face-to-face interactions, such as in a workshop, are best used to disseminate systems-level implementation information, such as fiscal implications, budgetary requirements, and policy relevance, which is not found in journal articles or conferences. An apparent shift in workplace culture signifies the availability of institutional support for high-level staff to engage in KE. CONCLUSIONS: As a KE strategy with identified end users, the workshop format is effective in facilitating the implementation of this intervention in participants’ institutions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3612586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36125862013-04-02 Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups Kazanjian, Arminee Smillie, Kirsten Stephen, Joanne Support Care Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of the research described here is to assess the overall effectiveness of the workshop format as a Knowledge Exchange (KE) strategy in (1) disseminating scientific evidence, clinical experience, and systems information related to professionally led Online Support Groups (OSG) for cancer survivors and (2) facilitating the implementation of this intervention by a select group of end users—decision makers and clinical leads in psychosocial supportive care. METHODS: The KE–Decision Support (KE-DS) Model, operationalizing the Health Technology Approach, guided the development of pre- and postworkshop questionnaires, and a follow-up questionnaire administered 5 months after the workshop. Questionnaire results were categorized according to participants’ responses to these elements: methods of engagement, evidence (scientific, experiential, systems) and the delivery of this evidence, and external factors at the institutional level, such as administrative support, budgetary issues, etc., that influence decision-maker abilities and strategies. RESULTS: Traditional KE strategies such as peer-reviewed journal articles are optimal for disseminating scientific evidence, while face-to-face interactions, such as in a workshop, are best used to disseminate systems-level implementation information, such as fiscal implications, budgetary requirements, and policy relevance, which is not found in journal articles or conferences. An apparent shift in workplace culture signifies the availability of institutional support for high-level staff to engage in KE. CONCLUSIONS: As a KE strategy with identified end users, the workshop format is effective in facilitating the implementation of this intervention in participants’ institutions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-12-29 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3612586/ /pubmed/23274924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kazanjian, Arminee Smillie, Kirsten Stephen, Joanne Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups |
title | Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups |
title_full | Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups |
title_fullStr | Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups |
title_short | Evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of Online Support Groups |
title_sort | evaluating a knowledge exchange intervention in cancer survivorship care: a workshop to foster implementation of online support groups |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274924 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1686-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazanjianarminee evaluatingaknowledgeexchangeinterventionincancersurvivorshipcareaworkshoptofosterimplementationofonlinesupportgroups AT smilliekirsten evaluatingaknowledgeexchangeinterventionincancersurvivorshipcareaworkshoptofosterimplementationofonlinesupportgroups AT stephenjoanne evaluatingaknowledgeexchangeinterventionincancersurvivorshipcareaworkshoptofosterimplementationofonlinesupportgroups |