Cargando…

Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition

How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object cate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Reilly, Randall C., Wyatte, Dean, Herd, Seth, Mingus, Brian, Jilk, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124
_version_ 1782264674809544704
author O’Reilly, Randall C.
Wyatte, Dean
Herd, Seth
Mingus, Brian
Jilk, David J.
author_facet O’Reilly, Randall C.
Wyatte, Dean
Herd, Seth
Mingus, Brian
Jilk, David J.
author_sort O’Reilly, Randall C.
collection PubMed
description How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object categories in the face of naturally occurring variability in location, rotation, size, and lighting. The model exhibits robustness to highly ambiguous, partially occluded inputs. Both the unified, biologically plausible learning mechanism and the robustness to occlusion derive from the role that recurrent connectivity and recurrent processing mechanisms play in the model. Furthermore, this interaction of recurrent connectivity and learning predicts that high-level visual representations should be shaped by error signals from nearby, associated brain areas over the course of visual learning. Consistent with this prediction, we show how semantic knowledge about object categories changes the nature of their learned visual representations, as well as how this representational shift supports the mapping between perceptual and conceptual knowledge. Altogether, these findings support the potential importance of ongoing recurrent processing throughout the brain’s visual system and suggest ways in which object recognition can be understood in terms of interactions within and between processes over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36126992013-04-01 Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition O’Reilly, Randall C. Wyatte, Dean Herd, Seth Mingus, Brian Jilk, David J. Front Psychol Psychology How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object categories in the face of naturally occurring variability in location, rotation, size, and lighting. The model exhibits robustness to highly ambiguous, partially occluded inputs. Both the unified, biologically plausible learning mechanism and the robustness to occlusion derive from the role that recurrent connectivity and recurrent processing mechanisms play in the model. Furthermore, this interaction of recurrent connectivity and learning predicts that high-level visual representations should be shaped by error signals from nearby, associated brain areas over the course of visual learning. Consistent with this prediction, we show how semantic knowledge about object categories changes the nature of their learned visual representations, as well as how this representational shift supports the mapping between perceptual and conceptual knowledge. Altogether, these findings support the potential importance of ongoing recurrent processing throughout the brain’s visual system and suggest ways in which object recognition can be understood in terms of interactions within and between processes over time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3612699/ /pubmed/23554596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124 Text en Copyright © 2013 O’Reilly, Wyatte, Herd, Mingus and Jilk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychology
O’Reilly, Randall C.
Wyatte, Dean
Herd, Seth
Mingus, Brian
Jilk, David J.
Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
title Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
title_full Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
title_fullStr Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
title_full_unstemmed Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
title_short Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
title_sort recurrent processing during object recognition
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124
work_keys_str_mv AT oreillyrandallc recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition
AT wyattedean recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition
AT herdseth recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition
AT mingusbrian recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition
AT jilkdavidj recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition