Cargando…
Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition
How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object cate...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124 |
_version_ | 1782264674809544704 |
---|---|
author | O’Reilly, Randall C. Wyatte, Dean Herd, Seth Mingus, Brian Jilk, David J. |
author_facet | O’Reilly, Randall C. Wyatte, Dean Herd, Seth Mingus, Brian Jilk, David J. |
author_sort | O’Reilly, Randall C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object categories in the face of naturally occurring variability in location, rotation, size, and lighting. The model exhibits robustness to highly ambiguous, partially occluded inputs. Both the unified, biologically plausible learning mechanism and the robustness to occlusion derive from the role that recurrent connectivity and recurrent processing mechanisms play in the model. Furthermore, this interaction of recurrent connectivity and learning predicts that high-level visual representations should be shaped by error signals from nearby, associated brain areas over the course of visual learning. Consistent with this prediction, we show how semantic knowledge about object categories changes the nature of their learned visual representations, as well as how this representational shift supports the mapping between perceptual and conceptual knowledge. Altogether, these findings support the potential importance of ongoing recurrent processing throughout the brain’s visual system and suggest ways in which object recognition can be understood in terms of interactions within and between processes over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3612699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36126992013-04-01 Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition O’Reilly, Randall C. Wyatte, Dean Herd, Seth Mingus, Brian Jilk, David J. Front Psychol Psychology How does the brain learn to recognize objects visually, and perform this difficult feat robustly in the face of many sources of ambiguity and variability? We present a computational model based on the biology of the relevant visual pathways that learns to reliably recognize 100 different object categories in the face of naturally occurring variability in location, rotation, size, and lighting. The model exhibits robustness to highly ambiguous, partially occluded inputs. Both the unified, biologically plausible learning mechanism and the robustness to occlusion derive from the role that recurrent connectivity and recurrent processing mechanisms play in the model. Furthermore, this interaction of recurrent connectivity and learning predicts that high-level visual representations should be shaped by error signals from nearby, associated brain areas over the course of visual learning. Consistent with this prediction, we show how semantic knowledge about object categories changes the nature of their learned visual representations, as well as how this representational shift supports the mapping between perceptual and conceptual knowledge. Altogether, these findings support the potential importance of ongoing recurrent processing throughout the brain’s visual system and suggest ways in which object recognition can be understood in terms of interactions within and between processes over time. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3612699/ /pubmed/23554596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124 Text en Copyright © 2013 O’Reilly, Wyatte, Herd, Mingus and Jilk. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Psychology O’Reilly, Randall C. Wyatte, Dean Herd, Seth Mingus, Brian Jilk, David J. Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition |
title | Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition |
title_full | Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition |
title_fullStr | Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition |
title_full_unstemmed | Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition |
title_short | Recurrent Processing during Object Recognition |
title_sort | recurrent processing during object recognition |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oreillyrandallc recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition AT wyattedean recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition AT herdseth recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition AT mingusbrian recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition AT jilkdavidj recurrentprocessingduringobjectrecognition |