Cargando…

Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The work incapacity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) ranges between 3% and 50% in Europe. In many countries, work incapacity is difficult to quantify. The work ability index (WAI) is applied to measure the work ability in workers, but it is not well investigated in patients. AIMS: To inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meyer, Katharina, Niedermann, Karin, Tschopp, Alois, Klipstein, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002231
_version_ 1782264678215319552
author Meyer, Katharina
Niedermann, Karin
Tschopp, Alois
Klipstein, Andreas
author_facet Meyer, Katharina
Niedermann, Karin
Tschopp, Alois
Klipstein, Andreas
author_sort Meyer, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The work incapacity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) ranges between 3% and 50% in Europe. In many countries, work incapacity is difficult to quantify. The work ability index (WAI) is applied to measure the work ability in workers, but it is not well investigated in patients. AIMS: To investigate the work incapacity in terms of absence days in patients with AS and to evaluate whether the WAI reflects the absence from work. HYPOTHESIS: Absence days can be estimated based on the WAI and other variables. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: In a secondary care centre in Switzerland, the WAI and a questionnaire about work absence were administered in AS patients prior to cardiovascular training. The number of absence days was collected retrospectively. The absence days were estimated using a two-part regression model. PARTICIPANTS: 92 AS patients (58 men (63%)). Inclusion criteria: AS diagnosis, ability to cycle, age between 18 and 65 years. Exclusion criteria: severe heart disease. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Absence days. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients, 14 received a disability pension and 78 were in the working process. The median absence days per year of the 78 patients due to AS alone and including other reasons was 0 days (IQR 0–12.3) and 2.5 days (IQR 0–19), respectively. The WAI score (regression coefficient=−4.66 (p<0.001, CI −6.1 to −3.2), ‘getting a disability pension’ (regression coefficient=−106.8 (p<0.001, 95% CI −141.6 to −72.0) and other not significant variables explained 70% of the variance in absence days (p<0.001), and therefore may estimate the number of absence days. CONCLUSIONS: Absences in our sample of AS patients were equal to pan-European countries. In groups of AS patients, the WAI and other variables are valid to estimate absence days with the help of a two-part regression model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3612752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36127522013-07-08 Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study Meyer, Katharina Niedermann, Karin Tschopp, Alois Klipstein, Andreas BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine BACKGROUND: The work incapacity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) ranges between 3% and 50% in Europe. In many countries, work incapacity is difficult to quantify. The work ability index (WAI) is applied to measure the work ability in workers, but it is not well investigated in patients. AIMS: To investigate the work incapacity in terms of absence days in patients with AS and to evaluate whether the WAI reflects the absence from work. HYPOTHESIS: Absence days can be estimated based on the WAI and other variables. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design. SETTING: In a secondary care centre in Switzerland, the WAI and a questionnaire about work absence were administered in AS patients prior to cardiovascular training. The number of absence days was collected retrospectively. The absence days were estimated using a two-part regression model. PARTICIPANTS: 92 AS patients (58 men (63%)). Inclusion criteria: AS diagnosis, ability to cycle, age between 18 and 65 years. Exclusion criteria: severe heart disease. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Absence days. RESULTS: Of the 92 patients, 14 received a disability pension and 78 were in the working process. The median absence days per year of the 78 patients due to AS alone and including other reasons was 0 days (IQR 0–12.3) and 2.5 days (IQR 0–19), respectively. The WAI score (regression coefficient=−4.66 (p<0.001, CI −6.1 to −3.2), ‘getting a disability pension’ (regression coefficient=−106.8 (p<0.001, 95% CI −141.6 to −72.0) and other not significant variables explained 70% of the variance in absence days (p<0.001), and therefore may estimate the number of absence days. CONCLUSIONS: Absences in our sample of AS patients were equal to pan-European countries. In groups of AS patients, the WAI and other variables are valid to estimate absence days with the help of a two-part regression model. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3612752/ /pubmed/23524041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002231 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution non-commercial license, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Meyer, Katharina
Niedermann, Karin
Tschopp, Alois
Klipstein, Andreas
Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study
title Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study
title_full Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study
title_short Is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? A cross-sectional study
title_sort is the work ability index useful to evaluate absence days in ankylosing spondylitis patients? a cross-sectional study
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23524041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002231
work_keys_str_mv AT meyerkatharina istheworkabilityindexusefultoevaluateabsencedaysinankylosingspondylitispatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT niedermannkarin istheworkabilityindexusefultoevaluateabsencedaysinankylosingspondylitispatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT tschoppalois istheworkabilityindexusefultoevaluateabsencedaysinankylosingspondylitispatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT klipsteinandreas istheworkabilityindexusefultoevaluateabsencedaysinankylosingspondylitispatientsacrosssectionalstudy