Cargando…

Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes

Background. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an excellent choice for people with residual hearing in low frequencies but not high frequencies and who derive insufficient benefit from hearing aids. For EAS to be effective, subjects' residual hearing must be preserved during cochlear implan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado, Guimaraes, Alexandre C., Duarte, Alexandre S. M., Muranaka, Eder B., Soki, Marcelo N., Martins, Renata S. Zanotello, Bianchini, Walter A., Paschoal, Jorge R., Castilho, Arthur M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/107186
_version_ 1782264713618391040
author de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
Guimaraes, Alexandre C.
Duarte, Alexandre S. M.
Muranaka, Eder B.
Soki, Marcelo N.
Martins, Renata S. Zanotello
Bianchini, Walter A.
Paschoal, Jorge R.
Castilho, Arthur M.
author_facet de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
Guimaraes, Alexandre C.
Duarte, Alexandre S. M.
Muranaka, Eder B.
Soki, Marcelo N.
Martins, Renata S. Zanotello
Bianchini, Walter A.
Paschoal, Jorge R.
Castilho, Arthur M.
author_sort de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
collection PubMed
description Background. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an excellent choice for people with residual hearing in low frequencies but not high frequencies and who derive insufficient benefit from hearing aids. For EAS to be effective, subjects' residual hearing must be preserved during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods. We implanted 6 subjects with a CI. We used a special surgical technique and an electrode designed to be atraumatic. Subjects' rates of residual hearing preservation were measured 3 times postoperatively, lastly after at least a year of implant experience. Subjects' aided speech perception was tested pre- and postoperatively with a sentence test in quiet. Subjects' subjective responses assessed after a year of EAS or CI experience. Results. 4 subjects had total or partial residual hearing preservation; 2 subjects had total residual hearing loss. All subjects' hearing and speech perception benefited from cochlear implantation. CI diminished or eliminated tinnitus in all 4 subjects who had it preoperatively. 5 subjects reported great satisfaction with their new device. Conclusions. When we have more experience with our surgical technique we are confident we will be able to report increased rates of residual hearing preservation. Hopefully, our study will raise the profile of EAS in Brazil and Latin/South America.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3613097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36130972013-04-09 Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Guimaraes, Alexandre C. Duarte, Alexandre S. M. Muranaka, Eder B. Soki, Marcelo N. Martins, Renata S. Zanotello Bianchini, Walter A. Paschoal, Jorge R. Castilho, Arthur M. Int J Otolaryngol Clinical Study Background. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an excellent choice for people with residual hearing in low frequencies but not high frequencies and who derive insufficient benefit from hearing aids. For EAS to be effective, subjects' residual hearing must be preserved during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods. We implanted 6 subjects with a CI. We used a special surgical technique and an electrode designed to be atraumatic. Subjects' rates of residual hearing preservation were measured 3 times postoperatively, lastly after at least a year of implant experience. Subjects' aided speech perception was tested pre- and postoperatively with a sentence test in quiet. Subjects' subjective responses assessed after a year of EAS or CI experience. Results. 4 subjects had total or partial residual hearing preservation; 2 subjects had total residual hearing loss. All subjects' hearing and speech perception benefited from cochlear implantation. CI diminished or eliminated tinnitus in all 4 subjects who had it preoperatively. 5 subjects reported great satisfaction with their new device. Conclusions. When we have more experience with our surgical technique we are confident we will be able to report increased rates of residual hearing preservation. Hopefully, our study will raise the profile of EAS in Brazil and Latin/South America. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3613097/ /pubmed/23573094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/107186 Text en Copyright © 2013 Guilherme Machado de Carvalho et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
Guimaraes, Alexandre C.
Duarte, Alexandre S. M.
Muranaka, Eder B.
Soki, Marcelo N.
Martins, Renata S. Zanotello
Bianchini, Walter A.
Paschoal, Jorge R.
Castilho, Arthur M.
Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
title Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
title_full Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
title_fullStr Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
title_short Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
title_sort hearing preservation after cochlear implantation: unicamp outcomes
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/107186
work_keys_str_mv AT decarvalhoguilhermemachado hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT guimaraesalexandrec hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT duartealexandresm hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT muranakaederb hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT sokimarcelon hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT martinsrenataszanotello hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT bianchiniwaltera hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT paschoaljorger hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes
AT castilhoarthurm hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes