Cargando…
Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes
Background. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an excellent choice for people with residual hearing in low frequencies but not high frequencies and who derive insufficient benefit from hearing aids. For EAS to be effective, subjects' residual hearing must be preserved during cochlear implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/107186 |
_version_ | 1782264713618391040 |
---|---|
author | de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Guimaraes, Alexandre C. Duarte, Alexandre S. M. Muranaka, Eder B. Soki, Marcelo N. Martins, Renata S. Zanotello Bianchini, Walter A. Paschoal, Jorge R. Castilho, Arthur M. |
author_facet | de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Guimaraes, Alexandre C. Duarte, Alexandre S. M. Muranaka, Eder B. Soki, Marcelo N. Martins, Renata S. Zanotello Bianchini, Walter A. Paschoal, Jorge R. Castilho, Arthur M. |
author_sort | de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an excellent choice for people with residual hearing in low frequencies but not high frequencies and who derive insufficient benefit from hearing aids. For EAS to be effective, subjects' residual hearing must be preserved during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods. We implanted 6 subjects with a CI. We used a special surgical technique and an electrode designed to be atraumatic. Subjects' rates of residual hearing preservation were measured 3 times postoperatively, lastly after at least a year of implant experience. Subjects' aided speech perception was tested pre- and postoperatively with a sentence test in quiet. Subjects' subjective responses assessed after a year of EAS or CI experience. Results. 4 subjects had total or partial residual hearing preservation; 2 subjects had total residual hearing loss. All subjects' hearing and speech perception benefited from cochlear implantation. CI diminished or eliminated tinnitus in all 4 subjects who had it preoperatively. 5 subjects reported great satisfaction with their new device. Conclusions. When we have more experience with our surgical technique we are confident we will be able to report increased rates of residual hearing preservation. Hopefully, our study will raise the profile of EAS in Brazil and Latin/South America. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3613097 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36130972013-04-09 Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Guimaraes, Alexandre C. Duarte, Alexandre S. M. Muranaka, Eder B. Soki, Marcelo N. Martins, Renata S. Zanotello Bianchini, Walter A. Paschoal, Jorge R. Castilho, Arthur M. Int J Otolaryngol Clinical Study Background. Electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is an excellent choice for people with residual hearing in low frequencies but not high frequencies and who derive insufficient benefit from hearing aids. For EAS to be effective, subjects' residual hearing must be preserved during cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Methods. We implanted 6 subjects with a CI. We used a special surgical technique and an electrode designed to be atraumatic. Subjects' rates of residual hearing preservation were measured 3 times postoperatively, lastly after at least a year of implant experience. Subjects' aided speech perception was tested pre- and postoperatively with a sentence test in quiet. Subjects' subjective responses assessed after a year of EAS or CI experience. Results. 4 subjects had total or partial residual hearing preservation; 2 subjects had total residual hearing loss. All subjects' hearing and speech perception benefited from cochlear implantation. CI diminished or eliminated tinnitus in all 4 subjects who had it preoperatively. 5 subjects reported great satisfaction with their new device. Conclusions. When we have more experience with our surgical technique we are confident we will be able to report increased rates of residual hearing preservation. Hopefully, our study will raise the profile of EAS in Brazil and Latin/South America. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3613097/ /pubmed/23573094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/107186 Text en Copyright © 2013 Guilherme Machado de Carvalho et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Guimaraes, Alexandre C. Duarte, Alexandre S. M. Muranaka, Eder B. Soki, Marcelo N. Martins, Renata S. Zanotello Bianchini, Walter A. Paschoal, Jorge R. Castilho, Arthur M. Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes |
title | Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes |
title_full | Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes |
title_short | Hearing Preservation after Cochlear Implantation: UNICAMP Outcomes |
title_sort | hearing preservation after cochlear implantation: unicamp outcomes |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613097/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/107186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT decarvalhoguilhermemachado hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT guimaraesalexandrec hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT duartealexandresm hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT muranakaederb hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT sokimarcelon hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT martinsrenataszanotello hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT bianchiniwaltera hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT paschoaljorger hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes AT castilhoarthurm hearingpreservationaftercochlearimplantationunicampoutcomes |