Cargando…

Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population

Objective: To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine-thymol varnish alone, its combination with chlorhexidine-fluoride containing dentifrice and fluoride varnish on oral hygiene and caries prevention in orthodontic patients. Study design: Sixty patients, aged 12-18, with orthodontic fixed appliances w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baygin, Ozgul, Tuzuner, Tamer, Ozel, Mehmet B., Bostanoglu, Ozge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18261
_version_ 1782264798556192768
author Baygin, Ozgul
Tuzuner, Tamer
Ozel, Mehmet B.
Bostanoglu, Ozge
author_facet Baygin, Ozgul
Tuzuner, Tamer
Ozel, Mehmet B.
Bostanoglu, Ozge
author_sort Baygin, Ozgul
collection PubMed
description Objective: To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine-thymol varnish alone, its combination with chlorhexidine-fluoride containing dentifrice and fluoride varnish on oral hygiene and caries prevention in orthodontic patients. Study design: Sixty patients, aged 12-18, with orthodontic fixed appliances were randomly assigned into three groups as follows: Group 1 (n=20): 1% chlorhexidine and 1% thymol varnish (Cervitec®Plus); Group 2 (n=20): Cervitec®Plus+ 0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% sodium fluoride (900 ppm fluoride) (Cervitec®Gel)); and Group 3 (n=20): 0.1% fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector®). Mutans streptococci (MS), lactobacilli (LB) levels, buffering capacity (BC), visible plaque index (VPI), and gingival bleeding index (GBI) scores were evaluated at four stages: T0, before orthodontic bonding; T1, one week after orthodontic bonding; T2, one week; and T3, four weeks after the first application, respectively. Inter and intra group comparisons were made by the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests with Bonferroni step-down correction (P<0.017). Results: Significantly lower MS and LB levels were found in Group 2 than Group 1 (T2) and 3 (T2, T3) (P<0.017). Groups 1-2 (T2) showed significantly higher BC (P<0.017) and lower VPI and GBI (P<0.017) scores compared with Group 3. Decreased MS levels at T2 (P<0.017) and T3 (P>0.017) were found in Group1-2 compared with T0. Significantly lower LB levels were recorded in Group 2 at T2 compared with T0 (P<0.017) while no significant differences were seen in Group 1 and 3 (P>0.017). Conclusions: Addition of Cervitec®Plus+Cervitec®Gel combination to the standard oral hygiene regimen may be beneficial for orthodontic patients for maintaining oral health by reducing bacterial colonisation and gingivitis. Key words:Chlorhexidine, flouride, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli, antibacterial effect, plaque, gingivitis, orthodontic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3613893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36138932013-04-02 Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population Baygin, Ozgul Tuzuner, Tamer Ozel, Mehmet B. Bostanoglu, Ozge Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Objective: To evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine-thymol varnish alone, its combination with chlorhexidine-fluoride containing dentifrice and fluoride varnish on oral hygiene and caries prevention in orthodontic patients. Study design: Sixty patients, aged 12-18, with orthodontic fixed appliances were randomly assigned into three groups as follows: Group 1 (n=20): 1% chlorhexidine and 1% thymol varnish (Cervitec®Plus); Group 2 (n=20): Cervitec®Plus+ 0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% sodium fluoride (900 ppm fluoride) (Cervitec®Gel)); and Group 3 (n=20): 0.1% fluoride varnish (Fluor Protector®). Mutans streptococci (MS), lactobacilli (LB) levels, buffering capacity (BC), visible plaque index (VPI), and gingival bleeding index (GBI) scores were evaluated at four stages: T0, before orthodontic bonding; T1, one week after orthodontic bonding; T2, one week; and T3, four weeks after the first application, respectively. Inter and intra group comparisons were made by the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Friedman and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests with Bonferroni step-down correction (P<0.017). Results: Significantly lower MS and LB levels were found in Group 2 than Group 1 (T2) and 3 (T2, T3) (P<0.017). Groups 1-2 (T2) showed significantly higher BC (P<0.017) and lower VPI and GBI (P<0.017) scores compared with Group 3. Decreased MS levels at T2 (P<0.017) and T3 (P>0.017) were found in Group1-2 compared with T0. Significantly lower LB levels were recorded in Group 2 at T2 compared with T0 (P<0.017) while no significant differences were seen in Group 1 and 3 (P>0.017). Conclusions: Addition of Cervitec®Plus+Cervitec®Gel combination to the standard oral hygiene regimen may be beneficial for orthodontic patients for maintaining oral health by reducing bacterial colonisation and gingivitis. Key words:Chlorhexidine, flouride, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli, antibacterial effect, plaque, gingivitis, orthodontic treatment. Medicina Oral S.L. 2013-03 2013-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3613893/ /pubmed/23385499 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18261 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Baygin, Ozgul
Tuzuner, Tamer
Ozel, Mehmet B.
Bostanoglu, Ozge
Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
title Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
title_full Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
title_fullStr Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
title_short Comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
title_sort comparison of combined application treatment with one-visit varnish treatments in an orthodontic population
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3613893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385499
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18261
work_keys_str_mv AT bayginozgul comparisonofcombinedapplicationtreatmentwithonevisitvarnishtreatmentsinanorthodonticpopulation
AT tuzunertamer comparisonofcombinedapplicationtreatmentwithonevisitvarnishtreatmentsinanorthodonticpopulation
AT ozelmehmetb comparisonofcombinedapplicationtreatmentwithonevisitvarnishtreatmentsinanorthodonticpopulation
AT bostanogluozge comparisonofcombinedapplicationtreatmentwithonevisitvarnishtreatmentsinanorthodonticpopulation