Cargando…

Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea

Steel monopiles, jackets requiring four steel pinpiles, and gravity-based foundations were applied in offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. This paper compares the underwater noise generated during the piling activities of steel monopiles at the Belwind wind farm (Blighbank) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norro, Alain Michel Jules, Rumes, Bob, Degraer, Steven Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624
_version_ 1782264806580944896
author Norro, Alain Michel Jules
Rumes, Bob
Degraer, Steven Johan
author_facet Norro, Alain Michel Jules
Rumes, Bob
Degraer, Steven Johan
author_sort Norro, Alain Michel Jules
collection PubMed
description Steel monopiles, jackets requiring four steel pinpiles, and gravity-based foundations were applied in offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. This paper compares the underwater noise generated during the piling activities of steel monopiles at the Belwind wind farm (Blighbank) with that of jacket pinpiles at the C-Power project (Thorntonbank). Underwater noise was measured at various distances from the pile driving location. The underwater noise was quantified by its zero to peak sound pressure level (L (z−p)), unweighted sound exposure level (SEL), cumulative SEL, and 1/3 octave spectra. No significant differences in L (z−p) could be demonstrated (monopile L (z−p): 179–194 dB re 1 μPa, jacket L (z−p): 172–189 dB re 1 μPa). SEL showed no statistical difference between monopile and jacket and varied between 145 and 168 dB re 1 μPa(2)s. Furthermore, near identical spectra were measured for both types of piling. Piling of the jacket pinpiles took, however, about 2.5 times the time of the monopile. When standardised to megawatt installed per foundation both types of piling scored near equally. As an illustration, the radius of major behavioural disturbance (L (p−p) = 155 dB re 1 μPa) in the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena was estimated by a model at 16 km for monopiles and at 8 km for jacket.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3614035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36140352013-04-10 Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea Norro, Alain Michel Jules Rumes, Bob Degraer, Steven Johan ScientificWorldJournal Research Article Steel monopiles, jackets requiring four steel pinpiles, and gravity-based foundations were applied in offshore wind farms in the Belgian part of the North Sea. This paper compares the underwater noise generated during the piling activities of steel monopiles at the Belwind wind farm (Blighbank) with that of jacket pinpiles at the C-Power project (Thorntonbank). Underwater noise was measured at various distances from the pile driving location. The underwater noise was quantified by its zero to peak sound pressure level (L (z−p)), unweighted sound exposure level (SEL), cumulative SEL, and 1/3 octave spectra. No significant differences in L (z−p) could be demonstrated (monopile L (z−p): 179–194 dB re 1 μPa, jacket L (z−p): 172–189 dB re 1 μPa). SEL showed no statistical difference between monopile and jacket and varied between 145 and 168 dB re 1 μPa(2)s. Furthermore, near identical spectra were measured for both types of piling. Piling of the jacket pinpiles took, however, about 2.5 times the time of the monopile. When standardised to megawatt installed per foundation both types of piling scored near equally. As an illustration, the radius of major behavioural disturbance (L (p−p) = 155 dB re 1 μPa) in the harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena was estimated by a model at 16 km for monopiles and at 8 km for jacket. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3614035/ /pubmed/23576910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624 Text en Copyright © 2013 Alain Michel Jules Norro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Norro, Alain Michel Jules
Rumes, Bob
Degraer, Steven Johan
Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_full Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_fullStr Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_full_unstemmed Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_short Differentiating between Underwater Construction Noise of Monopile and Jacket Foundations for Offshore Windmills: A Case Study from the Belgian Part of the North Sea
title_sort differentiating between underwater construction noise of monopile and jacket foundations for offshore windmills: a case study from the belgian part of the north sea
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/897624
work_keys_str_mv AT norroalainmicheljules differentiatingbetweenunderwaterconstructionnoiseofmonopileandjacketfoundationsforoffshorewindmillsacasestudyfromthebelgianpartofthenorthsea
AT rumesbob differentiatingbetweenunderwaterconstructionnoiseofmonopileandjacketfoundationsforoffshorewindmillsacasestudyfromthebelgianpartofthenorthsea
AT degraerstevenjohan differentiatingbetweenunderwaterconstructionnoiseofmonopileandjacketfoundationsforoffshorewindmillsacasestudyfromthebelgianpartofthenorthsea