Cargando…
Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the motor cortex (M1). Although the aftereffects of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability have been described, there is limited data describing the outcomes of differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/603502 |
_version_ | 1782264807030784000 |
---|---|
author | Kidgell, Dawson J. Daly, Robin M. Young, Kayleigh Lum, Jarrod Tooley, Gregory Jaberzadeh, Shapour Zoghi, Maryam Pearce, Alan J. |
author_facet | Kidgell, Dawson J. Daly, Robin M. Young, Kayleigh Lum, Jarrod Tooley, Gregory Jaberzadeh, Shapour Zoghi, Maryam Pearce, Alan J. |
author_sort | Kidgell, Dawson J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the motor cortex (M1). Although the aftereffects of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability have been described, there is limited data describing the outcomes of different tDCS intensities on intracortical circuits. To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the aftereffects of M1 excitability following anodal tDCS, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the effect of different intensities on cortical excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Using a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, with a one-week wash-out period, 14 participants (6 females and 8 males, 22–45 years) were exposed to 10 minutes of anodal tDCS at 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mA. TMS was used to measure M1 excitability and SICI of the contralateral wrist extensor muscle at baseline, immediately after and 15 and 30 minutes following cessation of anodal tDCS. Cortical excitability increased, whilst SICI was reduced at all time points following anodal tDCS. Interestingly, there were no differences between the three intensities of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability or SICI. These results suggest that the aftereffect of anodal tDCS on facilitating cortical excitability is due to the modulation of synaptic mechanisms associated with long-term potentiation and is not influenced by different tDCS intensities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3614037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36140372013-04-10 Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity Kidgell, Dawson J. Daly, Robin M. Young, Kayleigh Lum, Jarrod Tooley, Gregory Jaberzadeh, Shapour Zoghi, Maryam Pearce, Alan J. Neural Plast Research Article Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the motor cortex (M1). Although the aftereffects of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability have been described, there is limited data describing the outcomes of different tDCS intensities on intracortical circuits. To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the aftereffects of M1 excitability following anodal tDCS, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the effect of different intensities on cortical excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Using a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, with a one-week wash-out period, 14 participants (6 females and 8 males, 22–45 years) were exposed to 10 minutes of anodal tDCS at 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mA. TMS was used to measure M1 excitability and SICI of the contralateral wrist extensor muscle at baseline, immediately after and 15 and 30 minutes following cessation of anodal tDCS. Cortical excitability increased, whilst SICI was reduced at all time points following anodal tDCS. Interestingly, there were no differences between the three intensities of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability or SICI. These results suggest that the aftereffect of anodal tDCS on facilitating cortical excitability is due to the modulation of synaptic mechanisms associated with long-term potentiation and is not influenced by different tDCS intensities. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3614037/ /pubmed/23577272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/603502 Text en Copyright © 2013 Dawson J. Kidgell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kidgell, Dawson J. Daly, Robin M. Young, Kayleigh Lum, Jarrod Tooley, Gregory Jaberzadeh, Shapour Zoghi, Maryam Pearce, Alan J. Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity |
title | Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity |
title_full | Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity |
title_fullStr | Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity |
title_full_unstemmed | Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity |
title_short | Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity |
title_sort | different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/603502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kidgelldawsonj differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT dalyrobinm differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT youngkayleigh differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT lumjarrod differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT tooleygregory differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT jaberzadehshapour differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT zoghimaryam differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity AT pearcealanj differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity |