Cargando…

Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the motor cortex (M1). Although the aftereffects of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability have been described, there is limited data describing the outcomes of differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kidgell, Dawson J., Daly, Robin M., Young, Kayleigh, Lum, Jarrod, Tooley, Gregory, Jaberzadeh, Shapour, Zoghi, Maryam, Pearce, Alan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/603502
_version_ 1782264807030784000
author Kidgell, Dawson J.
Daly, Robin M.
Young, Kayleigh
Lum, Jarrod
Tooley, Gregory
Jaberzadeh, Shapour
Zoghi, Maryam
Pearce, Alan J.
author_facet Kidgell, Dawson J.
Daly, Robin M.
Young, Kayleigh
Lum, Jarrod
Tooley, Gregory
Jaberzadeh, Shapour
Zoghi, Maryam
Pearce, Alan J.
author_sort Kidgell, Dawson J.
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the motor cortex (M1). Although the aftereffects of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability have been described, there is limited data describing the outcomes of different tDCS intensities on intracortical circuits. To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the aftereffects of M1 excitability following anodal tDCS, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the effect of different intensities on cortical excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Using a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, with a one-week wash-out period, 14 participants (6 females and 8 males, 22–45 years) were exposed to 10 minutes of anodal tDCS at 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mA. TMS was used to measure M1 excitability and SICI of the contralateral wrist extensor muscle at baseline, immediately after and 15 and 30 minutes following cessation of anodal tDCS. Cortical excitability increased, whilst SICI was reduced at all time points following anodal tDCS. Interestingly, there were no differences between the three intensities of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability or SICI. These results suggest that the aftereffect of anodal tDCS on facilitating cortical excitability is due to the modulation of synaptic mechanisms associated with long-term potentiation and is not influenced by different tDCS intensities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3614037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36140372013-04-10 Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity Kidgell, Dawson J. Daly, Robin M. Young, Kayleigh Lum, Jarrod Tooley, Gregory Jaberzadeh, Shapour Zoghi, Maryam Pearce, Alan J. Neural Plast Research Article Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive technique that modulates the excitability of neurons within the motor cortex (M1). Although the aftereffects of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability have been described, there is limited data describing the outcomes of different tDCS intensities on intracortical circuits. To further elucidate the mechanisms underlying the aftereffects of M1 excitability following anodal tDCS, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the effect of different intensities on cortical excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI). Using a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, with a one-week wash-out period, 14 participants (6 females and 8 males, 22–45 years) were exposed to 10 minutes of anodal tDCS at 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 mA. TMS was used to measure M1 excitability and SICI of the contralateral wrist extensor muscle at baseline, immediately after and 15 and 30 minutes following cessation of anodal tDCS. Cortical excitability increased, whilst SICI was reduced at all time points following anodal tDCS. Interestingly, there were no differences between the three intensities of anodal tDCS on modulating cortical excitability or SICI. These results suggest that the aftereffect of anodal tDCS on facilitating cortical excitability is due to the modulation of synaptic mechanisms associated with long-term potentiation and is not influenced by different tDCS intensities. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3614037/ /pubmed/23577272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/603502 Text en Copyright © 2013 Dawson J. Kidgell et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kidgell, Dawson J.
Daly, Robin M.
Young, Kayleigh
Lum, Jarrod
Tooley, Gregory
Jaberzadeh, Shapour
Zoghi, Maryam
Pearce, Alan J.
Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
title Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
title_full Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
title_fullStr Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
title_full_unstemmed Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
title_short Different Current Intensities of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Differentially Modulate Motor Cortex Plasticity
title_sort different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23577272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/603502
work_keys_str_mv AT kidgelldawsonj differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT dalyrobinm differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT youngkayleigh differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT lumjarrod differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT tooleygregory differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT jaberzadehshapour differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT zoghimaryam differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity
AT pearcealanj differentcurrentintensitiesofanodaltranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationdonotdifferentiallymodulatemotorcortexplasticity