Cargando…

Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study

BACKGROUND: Sexual health research relies heavily on self-reported data. We explored whether repeating a key measure – number of lifetime sexual partners – improved the validity of this self-reported response. METHODS: Using data from a study of Tanzanian plantation residents, we examined which of 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norris Turner, Abigail, Paul, Prabasaj, Norris, Alison H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-34
_version_ 1782264838309806080
author Norris Turner, Abigail
Paul, Prabasaj
Norris, Alison H
author_facet Norris Turner, Abigail
Paul, Prabasaj
Norris, Alison H
author_sort Norris Turner, Abigail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sexual health research relies heavily on self-reported data. We explored whether repeating a key measure – number of lifetime sexual partners – improved the validity of this self-reported response. METHODS: Using data from a study of Tanzanian plantation residents, we examined which of 505 participants changed their responses when a question about sexual partners was repeated. We examined which variable (first, second, or maximum response) was more predictive of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) seropositivity, a biomarker strongly associated with number of lifetime partners. HSV-2 status was assessed using the HerpeSelect 2 ELISA IgG test. RESULTS: When asked a second time, 10.7% of participants increased and 3.6% decreased their reported number of partners. Participants using audio computer-assisted self-interviews were more likely to change than those interviewed in person (p = 0.006). The increased odds of HSV-2 seropositivity with each additional partner ranged from 10% to 13% in men, and 33% to 37% in women, depending on which partner variable was used. Estimates had considerable confidence interval overlap and no substantial differences in precision. CONCLUSIONS: Some participants change their responses when asked a sensitive question a second time, but in this population, changes did not meaningfully affect associations between lifetime partners and HSV-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3614432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36144322013-04-03 Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study Norris Turner, Abigail Paul, Prabasaj Norris, Alison H BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Sexual health research relies heavily on self-reported data. We explored whether repeating a key measure – number of lifetime sexual partners – improved the validity of this self-reported response. METHODS: Using data from a study of Tanzanian plantation residents, we examined which of 505 participants changed their responses when a question about sexual partners was repeated. We examined which variable (first, second, or maximum response) was more predictive of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) seropositivity, a biomarker strongly associated with number of lifetime partners. HSV-2 status was assessed using the HerpeSelect 2 ELISA IgG test. RESULTS: When asked a second time, 10.7% of participants increased and 3.6% decreased their reported number of partners. Participants using audio computer-assisted self-interviews were more likely to change than those interviewed in person (p = 0.006). The increased odds of HSV-2 seropositivity with each additional partner ranged from 10% to 13% in men, and 33% to 37% in women, depending on which partner variable was used. Estimates had considerable confidence interval overlap and no substantial differences in precision. CONCLUSIONS: Some participants change their responses when asked a sensitive question a second time, but in this population, changes did not meaningfully affect associations between lifetime partners and HSV-2. BioMed Central 2013-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3614432/ /pubmed/23496958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-34 Text en Copyright © 2013 Norris Turner et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Norris Turner, Abigail
Paul, Prabasaj
Norris, Alison H
Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
title Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
title_full Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
title_fullStr Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
title_full_unstemmed Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
title_short Limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
title_sort limited benefit of repeating a sensitive question in a cross-sectional sexual health study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23496958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-34
work_keys_str_mv AT norristurnerabigail limitedbenefitofrepeatingasensitivequestioninacrosssectionalsexualhealthstudy
AT paulprabasaj limitedbenefitofrepeatingasensitivequestioninacrosssectionalsexualhealthstudy
AT norrisalisonh limitedbenefitofrepeatingasensitivequestioninacrosssectionalsexualhealthstudy