Cargando…
Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently
BACKGROUND: Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) are extensively used as biophysical tools in the area of medicine and technology due to their distinct properties. However, vivid understanding of the consequences of biomolecule-nanomaterial interactions is still lacking. In this context, we explore the affect...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-7 |
_version_ | 1782264840346140672 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Vibha Nair, Santhosh P Nagappan Aradhyam, Gopala Krishna |
author_facet | Singh, Vibha Nair, Santhosh P Nagappan Aradhyam, Gopala Krishna |
author_sort | Singh, Vibha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) are extensively used as biophysical tools in the area of medicine and technology due to their distinct properties. However, vivid understanding of the consequences of biomolecule-nanomaterial interactions is still lacking. In this context, we explore the affect of conjugation of Gα(i1) subunit (of heterotrimeric G-proteins) to AuNP and examine its consequences. We consider two bio-conjugation strategies covalent and non-covalent binding. RESULTS: Affinity of the AuNP to the Gα(i1) is 7.58 × 10 (12) M(-1). AuNP conjugated Gα(i1) exhibits altered kinetics of activation, non-covalent bio-conjugates displays retarded kinetics, up to 0.88 fold when GTPγS was used as ligand, of protein activation contrary to covalent conjugates which accelerates it to ~ 5 fold. Conjugation influence intrinsic Gαi1 GTPase function in conflicting modes. Non-covalent conjugation inhibits GTPase function (decrease in activity upto 0.8 fold) whilst covalent conjugation drastically accelerates it (12 fold increase in activity). Altered basal nucleotide uptake in both types of conjugates and GTPase function in non-covalent conjugate are almost comparable except for GTPase property of covalent conjugate. The effect is despite the fact that conjugation does not change global conformation of the protein. CONCLUSION: These findings provide clear evidence that nanoparticles, in addition to ‘passive interaction’ with protein (biomolecule), can interact “actively” with biomolecule and modify its function. This concept should be considered while engineering nanoparticle based delivery systems in medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3614441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36144412013-04-03 Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently Singh, Vibha Nair, Santhosh P Nagappan Aradhyam, Gopala Krishna J Nanobiotechnology Research BACKGROUND: Gold nanoparticles (AuNP) are extensively used as biophysical tools in the area of medicine and technology due to their distinct properties. However, vivid understanding of the consequences of biomolecule-nanomaterial interactions is still lacking. In this context, we explore the affect of conjugation of Gα(i1) subunit (of heterotrimeric G-proteins) to AuNP and examine its consequences. We consider two bio-conjugation strategies covalent and non-covalent binding. RESULTS: Affinity of the AuNP to the Gα(i1) is 7.58 × 10 (12) M(-1). AuNP conjugated Gα(i1) exhibits altered kinetics of activation, non-covalent bio-conjugates displays retarded kinetics, up to 0.88 fold when GTPγS was used as ligand, of protein activation contrary to covalent conjugates which accelerates it to ~ 5 fold. Conjugation influence intrinsic Gαi1 GTPase function in conflicting modes. Non-covalent conjugation inhibits GTPase function (decrease in activity upto 0.8 fold) whilst covalent conjugation drastically accelerates it (12 fold increase in activity). Altered basal nucleotide uptake in both types of conjugates and GTPase function in non-covalent conjugate are almost comparable except for GTPase property of covalent conjugate. The effect is despite the fact that conjugation does not change global conformation of the protein. CONCLUSION: These findings provide clear evidence that nanoparticles, in addition to ‘passive interaction’ with protein (biomolecule), can interact “actively” with biomolecule and modify its function. This concept should be considered while engineering nanoparticle based delivery systems in medicine. BioMed Central 2013-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3614441/ /pubmed/23510390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-7 Text en Copyright © 2013 Singh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Singh, Vibha Nair, Santhosh P Nagappan Aradhyam, Gopala Krishna Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently |
title | Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently |
title_full | Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently |
title_fullStr | Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently |
title_short | Chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects G-protein activity differently |
title_sort | chemistry of conjugation to gold nanoparticles affects g-protein activity differently |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23510390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-3155-11-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhvibha chemistryofconjugationtogoldnanoparticlesaffectsgproteinactivitydifferently AT nairsanthoshpnagappan chemistryofconjugationtogoldnanoparticlesaffectsgproteinactivitydifferently AT aradhyamgopalakrishna chemistryofconjugationtogoldnanoparticlesaffectsgproteinactivitydifferently |