Cargando…

Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation

Abundant behavioral evidence suggests that the ability to self-control is limited, and that any exertion of self-control will increase the likelihood of subsequent self-control failures. Here we investigated the neural correlates underlying the aftereffects of self-control on future control processe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friese, Malte, Binder, Julia, Luechinger, Roger, Boesiger, Peter, Rasch, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060385
_version_ 1782264852960509952
author Friese, Malte
Binder, Julia
Luechinger, Roger
Boesiger, Peter
Rasch, Björn
author_facet Friese, Malte
Binder, Julia
Luechinger, Roger
Boesiger, Peter
Rasch, Björn
author_sort Friese, Malte
collection PubMed
description Abundant behavioral evidence suggests that the ability to self-control is limited, and that any exertion of self-control will increase the likelihood of subsequent self-control failures. Here we investigated the neural correlates underlying the aftereffects of self-control on future control processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). An initial act of self-control (suppressing emotions) impaired subsequent performance in a second task requiring control (Stroop task). On the neural level, increased activity during emotion suppression was followed by a relative decrease in activity during the Stroop task in a cluster in the right lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), an area engaged in the effortful implementation of control. There was no reliable evidence for reduced activity in the medial frontal cortex (MFC) including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which is involved in conflict detection processes and has previously also been implicated in self-control. Follow-up analyses showed that the detected cluster in the right lateral PFC and an area in the MFC were involved in both the emotion suppression task and the Stroop task, but only the cluster in the right lateral PFC showed reduced activation after emotion suppression during the Stroop task. Reduced activity in lateral prefrontal areas relevant for the implementation of control may be a critical consequence of prior self-control exertion if the respective areas are involved in both self-control tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3614508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36145082013-04-05 Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation Friese, Malte Binder, Julia Luechinger, Roger Boesiger, Peter Rasch, Björn PLoS One Research Article Abundant behavioral evidence suggests that the ability to self-control is limited, and that any exertion of self-control will increase the likelihood of subsequent self-control failures. Here we investigated the neural correlates underlying the aftereffects of self-control on future control processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). An initial act of self-control (suppressing emotions) impaired subsequent performance in a second task requiring control (Stroop task). On the neural level, increased activity during emotion suppression was followed by a relative decrease in activity during the Stroop task in a cluster in the right lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), an area engaged in the effortful implementation of control. There was no reliable evidence for reduced activity in the medial frontal cortex (MFC) including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which is involved in conflict detection processes and has previously also been implicated in self-control. Follow-up analyses showed that the detected cluster in the right lateral PFC and an area in the MFC were involved in both the emotion suppression task and the Stroop task, but only the cluster in the right lateral PFC showed reduced activation after emotion suppression during the Stroop task. Reduced activity in lateral prefrontal areas relevant for the implementation of control may be a critical consequence of prior self-control exertion if the respective areas are involved in both self-control tasks. Public Library of Science 2013-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3614508/ /pubmed/23565239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060385 Text en © 2013 Friese et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Friese, Malte
Binder, Julia
Luechinger, Roger
Boesiger, Peter
Rasch, Björn
Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation
title Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation
title_full Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation
title_fullStr Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation
title_full_unstemmed Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation
title_short Suppressing Emotions Impairs Subsequent Stroop Performance and Reduces Prefrontal Brain Activation
title_sort suppressing emotions impairs subsequent stroop performance and reduces prefrontal brain activation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060385
work_keys_str_mv AT friesemalte suppressingemotionsimpairssubsequentstroopperformanceandreducesprefrontalbrainactivation
AT binderjulia suppressingemotionsimpairssubsequentstroopperformanceandreducesprefrontalbrainactivation
AT luechingerroger suppressingemotionsimpairssubsequentstroopperformanceandreducesprefrontalbrainactivation
AT boesigerpeter suppressingemotionsimpairssubsequentstroopperformanceandreducesprefrontalbrainactivation
AT raschbjorn suppressingemotionsimpairssubsequentstroopperformanceandreducesprefrontalbrainactivation