Cargando…

When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?

BACKGROUND: Technetium-labeled agents, which are most often used for assessing myocardial perfusion in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are cleared by the liver and excreted by the biliary system. Spillover from extra-cardiac activity into the myocardium, especially the inferior wall, might...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johansen, Allan, Lomsky, Milan, Gerke, Oke, Edenbrandt, Lars, Johansson, Lena, Hansen, Gunhild, Jensen, Birgitte, Reid, Maria Sallerup, Johansson, Lise-Lott, Olofsson, Camilla, Minarik, David, Nyström, Karin, Wollmer, Per, Trägårdh, Elin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-20
_version_ 1782264859329560576
author Johansen, Allan
Lomsky, Milan
Gerke, Oke
Edenbrandt, Lars
Johansson, Lena
Hansen, Gunhild
Jensen, Birgitte
Reid, Maria Sallerup
Johansson, Lise-Lott
Olofsson, Camilla
Minarik, David
Nyström, Karin
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
author_facet Johansen, Allan
Lomsky, Milan
Gerke, Oke
Edenbrandt, Lars
Johansson, Lena
Hansen, Gunhild
Jensen, Birgitte
Reid, Maria Sallerup
Johansson, Lise-Lott
Olofsson, Camilla
Minarik, David
Nyström, Karin
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
author_sort Johansen, Allan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Technetium-labeled agents, which are most often used for assessing myocardial perfusion in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are cleared by the liver and excreted by the biliary system. Spillover from extra-cardiac activity into the myocardium, especially the inferior wall, might conceal defects and lower the diagnostic accuracy of the study. The objective was to determine rules of thumb for when reacquisition is useful due to high extra-cardiac uptake, i.e., when interpretation of the studies was affected by poor image quality. METHODS: Patients admitted to MPS at any of the three study sites, who also underwent a reacquisition due to high extra-cardiac uptake were included. Image quality was assessed by ten technologists on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. Interpretations regarding the presence/absence of ischemia/infarction, including the certainty of the diagnosis, were made by three physicians. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in image quality between the first and the repeated acquisition (1,256 cases of increased quality at the repeated study (66%), 134 cases of decreased quality at the repeated study (7%), 510 cases of unchanged quality (27%) P < 0.0001). The number of equivocal studies, interpreted by physicians, decreased when evaluating the repeated studies compared to the first studies for all physicians, both for the interpretations of ischemia and for infarction. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that for both endpoints (ischemia, infarction) and all physicians, the optimal cutoff point for performing a reacquisition was between quality categories 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that repeat acquisition is useful when (1) the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is equal to or higher than the cardiac uptake when there is no separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior cardiac wall and (2) when the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is higher than the cardiac uptake when there is a separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior wall of less than one cardiac wall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3614539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36145392013-04-04 When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? Johansen, Allan Lomsky, Milan Gerke, Oke Edenbrandt, Lars Johansson, Lena Hansen, Gunhild Jensen, Birgitte Reid, Maria Sallerup Johansson, Lise-Lott Olofsson, Camilla Minarik, David Nyström, Karin Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Technetium-labeled agents, which are most often used for assessing myocardial perfusion in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are cleared by the liver and excreted by the biliary system. Spillover from extra-cardiac activity into the myocardium, especially the inferior wall, might conceal defects and lower the diagnostic accuracy of the study. The objective was to determine rules of thumb for when reacquisition is useful due to high extra-cardiac uptake, i.e., when interpretation of the studies was affected by poor image quality. METHODS: Patients admitted to MPS at any of the three study sites, who also underwent a reacquisition due to high extra-cardiac uptake were included. Image quality was assessed by ten technologists on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. Interpretations regarding the presence/absence of ischemia/infarction, including the certainty of the diagnosis, were made by three physicians. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in image quality between the first and the repeated acquisition (1,256 cases of increased quality at the repeated study (66%), 134 cases of decreased quality at the repeated study (7%), 510 cases of unchanged quality (27%) P < 0.0001). The number of equivocal studies, interpreted by physicians, decreased when evaluating the repeated studies compared to the first studies for all physicians, both for the interpretations of ischemia and for infarction. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that for both endpoints (ischemia, infarction) and all physicians, the optimal cutoff point for performing a reacquisition was between quality categories 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that repeat acquisition is useful when (1) the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is equal to or higher than the cardiac uptake when there is no separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior cardiac wall and (2) when the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is higher than the cardiac uptake when there is a separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior wall of less than one cardiac wall. Springer 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3614539/ /pubmed/23521849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-20 Text en Copyright ©2013 Johansen et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Johansen, Allan
Lomsky, Milan
Gerke, Oke
Edenbrandt, Lars
Johansson, Lena
Hansen, Gunhild
Jensen, Birgitte
Reid, Maria Sallerup
Johansson, Lise-Lott
Olofsson, Camilla
Minarik, David
Nyström, Karin
Wollmer, Per
Trägårdh, Elin
When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
title When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
title_full When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
title_fullStr When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
title_full_unstemmed When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
title_short When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
title_sort when is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-20
work_keys_str_mv AT johansenallan whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT lomskymilan whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT gerkeoke whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT edenbrandtlars whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT johanssonlena whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT hansengunhild whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT jensenbirgitte whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT reidmariasallerup whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT johanssonliselott whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT olofssoncamilla whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT minarikdavid whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT nystromkarin whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT wollmerper whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy
AT tragardhelin whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy