Cargando…
When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy?
BACKGROUND: Technetium-labeled agents, which are most often used for assessing myocardial perfusion in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are cleared by the liver and excreted by the biliary system. Spillover from extra-cardiac activity into the myocardium, especially the inferior wall, might...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-20 |
_version_ | 1782264859329560576 |
---|---|
author | Johansen, Allan Lomsky, Milan Gerke, Oke Edenbrandt, Lars Johansson, Lena Hansen, Gunhild Jensen, Birgitte Reid, Maria Sallerup Johansson, Lise-Lott Olofsson, Camilla Minarik, David Nyström, Karin Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin |
author_facet | Johansen, Allan Lomsky, Milan Gerke, Oke Edenbrandt, Lars Johansson, Lena Hansen, Gunhild Jensen, Birgitte Reid, Maria Sallerup Johansson, Lise-Lott Olofsson, Camilla Minarik, David Nyström, Karin Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin |
author_sort | Johansen, Allan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Technetium-labeled agents, which are most often used for assessing myocardial perfusion in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are cleared by the liver and excreted by the biliary system. Spillover from extra-cardiac activity into the myocardium, especially the inferior wall, might conceal defects and lower the diagnostic accuracy of the study. The objective was to determine rules of thumb for when reacquisition is useful due to high extra-cardiac uptake, i.e., when interpretation of the studies was affected by poor image quality. METHODS: Patients admitted to MPS at any of the three study sites, who also underwent a reacquisition due to high extra-cardiac uptake were included. Image quality was assessed by ten technologists on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. Interpretations regarding the presence/absence of ischemia/infarction, including the certainty of the diagnosis, were made by three physicians. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in image quality between the first and the repeated acquisition (1,256 cases of increased quality at the repeated study (66%), 134 cases of decreased quality at the repeated study (7%), 510 cases of unchanged quality (27%) P < 0.0001). The number of equivocal studies, interpreted by physicians, decreased when evaluating the repeated studies compared to the first studies for all physicians, both for the interpretations of ischemia and for infarction. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that for both endpoints (ischemia, infarction) and all physicians, the optimal cutoff point for performing a reacquisition was between quality categories 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that repeat acquisition is useful when (1) the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is equal to or higher than the cardiac uptake when there is no separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior cardiac wall and (2) when the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is higher than the cardiac uptake when there is a separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior wall of less than one cardiac wall. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3614539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36145392013-04-04 When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? Johansen, Allan Lomsky, Milan Gerke, Oke Edenbrandt, Lars Johansson, Lena Hansen, Gunhild Jensen, Birgitte Reid, Maria Sallerup Johansson, Lise-Lott Olofsson, Camilla Minarik, David Nyström, Karin Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Technetium-labeled agents, which are most often used for assessing myocardial perfusion in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), are cleared by the liver and excreted by the biliary system. Spillover from extra-cardiac activity into the myocardium, especially the inferior wall, might conceal defects and lower the diagnostic accuracy of the study. The objective was to determine rules of thumb for when reacquisition is useful due to high extra-cardiac uptake, i.e., when interpretation of the studies was affected by poor image quality. METHODS: Patients admitted to MPS at any of the three study sites, who also underwent a reacquisition due to high extra-cardiac uptake were included. Image quality was assessed by ten technologists on a scale ranging from 1 to 5. Interpretations regarding the presence/absence of ischemia/infarction, including the certainty of the diagnosis, were made by three physicians. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in image quality between the first and the repeated acquisition (1,256 cases of increased quality at the repeated study (66%), 134 cases of decreased quality at the repeated study (7%), 510 cases of unchanged quality (27%) P < 0.0001). The number of equivocal studies, interpreted by physicians, decreased when evaluating the repeated studies compared to the first studies for all physicians, both for the interpretations of ischemia and for infarction. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that for both endpoints (ischemia, infarction) and all physicians, the optimal cutoff point for performing a reacquisition was between quality categories 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that repeat acquisition is useful when (1) the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is equal to or higher than the cardiac uptake when there is no separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior cardiac wall and (2) when the intensity of the extra-cardiac uptake is higher than the cardiac uptake when there is a separation between the extra-cardiac uptake and the inferior wall of less than one cardiac wall. Springer 2013-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3614539/ /pubmed/23521849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-20 Text en Copyright ©2013 Johansen et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Johansen, Allan Lomsky, Milan Gerke, Oke Edenbrandt, Lars Johansson, Lena Hansen, Gunhild Jensen, Birgitte Reid, Maria Sallerup Johansson, Lise-Lott Olofsson, Camilla Minarik, David Nyström, Karin Wollmer, Per Trägårdh, Elin When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
title | When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
title_full | When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
title_fullStr | When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
title_full_unstemmed | When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
title_short | When is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
title_sort | when is reacquisition necessary due to high extra-cardiac uptake in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23521849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-3-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johansenallan whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT lomskymilan whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT gerkeoke whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT edenbrandtlars whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT johanssonlena whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT hansengunhild whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT jensenbirgitte whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT reidmariasallerup whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT johanssonliselott whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT olofssoncamilla whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT minarikdavid whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT nystromkarin whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT wollmerper whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy AT tragardhelin whenisreacquisitionnecessaryduetohighextracardiacuptakeinmyocardialperfusionscintigraphy |