Cargando…
Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brachial plexus block by the highest point of the shoulder method may decrease the rate of complication in comparing with the vertical method because the needle is more lateral in the former. We aimed to investigate the highest point of the shoulder block technique against the ve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Master Publishing Group
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675114 |
_version_ | 1782264908670304256 |
---|---|
author | S, Kiritoglu G, Basaranoglu M, Comlekci M, Suren K, Erkalp G, Teker L, Saidoglu |
author_facet | S, Kiritoglu G, Basaranoglu M, Comlekci M, Suren K, Erkalp G, Teker L, Saidoglu |
author_sort | S, Kiritoglu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brachial plexus block by the highest point of the shoulder method may decrease the rate of complication in comparing with the vertical method because the needle is more lateral in the former. We aimed to investigate the highest point of the shoulder block technique against the vertical infraclavicular plexus method regarding the success rates and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with ASA I-III undergoing elective surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups, randomly. Group 1 was the highest point of the shoulder method (n of 15), and goup 2 was the vertical approach technique (n of 15). The extensor motor response of hand, wrist and elbow (The target nerves in the operation area: n. medianus, n. ulnaris, n. radialis and n. musculocutanaeus) was obtained by neurostimulation technique. Then, 30 ml bupivacaine (0.5%) was used for the initial block. Spread of analgesia and sensory and motor blocks were evaluated every 5 minutes by an anesthesiologist who was blind to the block techniques. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: T-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used. RESULTS: Successful block was achieved in all patients in both groups. There was no difference among the groups for the onset of block and the duration of block (both sensory and motor), the number of attempt, and the depth of the neddle. One patient developed pneumothorax in group 2. Procedure time of the block was longer in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The highest point of shoulder method with a less complication rate and shorter procedure time has a comparable success rate to vertical approach technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3614756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Master Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36147562013-05-01 Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block S, Kiritoglu G, Basaranoglu M, Comlekci M, Suren K, Erkalp G, Teker L, Saidoglu Int J Biomed Sci Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: Brachial plexus block by the highest point of the shoulder method may decrease the rate of complication in comparing with the vertical method because the needle is more lateral in the former. We aimed to investigate the highest point of the shoulder block technique against the vertical infraclavicular plexus method regarding the success rates and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with ASA I-III undergoing elective surgery were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups, randomly. Group 1 was the highest point of the shoulder method (n of 15), and goup 2 was the vertical approach technique (n of 15). The extensor motor response of hand, wrist and elbow (The target nerves in the operation area: n. medianus, n. ulnaris, n. radialis and n. musculocutanaeus) was obtained by neurostimulation technique. Then, 30 ml bupivacaine (0.5%) was used for the initial block. Spread of analgesia and sensory and motor blocks were evaluated every 5 minutes by an anesthesiologist who was blind to the block techniques. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: T-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used. RESULTS: Successful block was achieved in all patients in both groups. There was no difference among the groups for the onset of block and the duration of block (both sensory and motor), the number of attempt, and the depth of the neddle. One patient developed pneumothorax in group 2. Procedure time of the block was longer in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The highest point of shoulder method with a less complication rate and shorter procedure time has a comparable success rate to vertical approach technique. Master Publishing Group 2009-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3614756/ /pubmed/23675114 Text en © Kiritoglu S. et al. Licensee Master Publishing Group http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article S, Kiritoglu G, Basaranoglu M, Comlekci M, Suren K, Erkalp G, Teker L, Saidoglu Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block |
title | Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block |
title_full | Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block |
title_short | Comparison of the Vertical and the Highest Point of Shoulder Methods in Brachial Plexus Block |
title_sort | comparison of the vertical and the highest point of shoulder methods in brachial plexus block |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23675114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skiritoglu comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock AT gbasaranoglu comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock AT mcomlekci comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock AT msuren comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock AT kerkalp comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock AT gteker comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock AT lsaidoglu comparisonoftheverticalandthehighestpointofshouldermethodsinbrachialplexusblock |