Cargando…

Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode

BACKGROUND: Measurement of partial pressure of oxygen (P(O2)) at high temporal resolution remains a technological challenge. This study introduces a novel P(O2) sensing technology based on Multi-Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF). The aim was to validate MFPF against polarographic Clark-type electro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boehme, Stefan, Duenges, Bastian, Klein, Klaus U., Hartwich, Volker, Mayr, Beate, Consiglio, Jolanda, Baumgardner, James E., Markstaller, Klaus, Basciani, Reto, Vogt, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060591
_version_ 1782264940376096768
author Boehme, Stefan
Duenges, Bastian
Klein, Klaus U.
Hartwich, Volker
Mayr, Beate
Consiglio, Jolanda
Baumgardner, James E.
Markstaller, Klaus
Basciani, Reto
Vogt, Andreas
author_facet Boehme, Stefan
Duenges, Bastian
Klein, Klaus U.
Hartwich, Volker
Mayr, Beate
Consiglio, Jolanda
Baumgardner, James E.
Markstaller, Klaus
Basciani, Reto
Vogt, Andreas
author_sort Boehme, Stefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Measurement of partial pressure of oxygen (P(O2)) at high temporal resolution remains a technological challenge. This study introduces a novel P(O2) sensing technology based on Multi-Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF). The aim was to validate MFPF against polarographic Clark-type electrode (CTE) P(O2) measurements. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: MFPF technology was first investigated in N = 8 anaesthetised pigs at F(IO2) of 0.21, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. At each F(IO2) level, blood samples were withdrawn and P(O2) was measured in vitro with MFPF using two FOXY-AL300 probes immediately followed by CTE measurement. Secondly, MFPF-P(O2) readings were compared to CTE in an artificial circulatory setup (human packed red blood cells, haematocrit of 30%). The impacts of temperature (20, 30, 40°C) and blood flow (0.8, 1.6, 2.4, 3.2, 4.0 L min(−1)) on MFPF-P(O2) measurements were assessed. MFPF response time in the gas- and blood-phase was determined. Porcine MFPF-P(O2) ranged from 63 to 749 mmHg; the corresponding CTE samples from 43 to 712 mmHg. Linear regression: CTE = 15.59+1.18*MFPF (R(2) = 0.93; P<0.0001). Bland Altman analysis: mean(diff) 69.2 mmHg, range(diff) -50.1/215.6 mmHg, 1.96-SD limits -56.3/194.8 mmHg. In artificial circulatory setup, MFPF-P(O2) ranged from 20 to 567 mmHg and CTE samples from 11 to 575 mmHg. Linear regression: CTE = −8.73+1.05*MFPF (R(2) = 0.99; P<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis: mean(diff) 6.6 mmHg, range(diff) -9.7/20.5 mmHg, 1.96-SD limits -12.7/25.8 mmHg. Differences between MFPF and CTE-P(O2) due to variations of temperature were less than 6 mmHg (range 0–140 mmHg) and less than 35 mmHg (range 140–750 mmHg); differences due to variations in blood flow were less than 15 mmHg (all P-values>0.05). MFPF response-time (monoexponential) was 1.48±0.26 s for the gas-phase and 1.51±0.20 s for the blood-phase. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: MFPF-derived P(O2) readings were reproducible and showed excellent correlation and good agreement with Clark-type electrode-based P(O2) measurements. There was no relevant impact of temperature and blood flow upon MFPF-P(O2) measurements. The response time of the MFPF FOXY-AL300 probe was adequate for real-time sensing in the blood phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3614895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36148952013-04-05 Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode Boehme, Stefan Duenges, Bastian Klein, Klaus U. Hartwich, Volker Mayr, Beate Consiglio, Jolanda Baumgardner, James E. Markstaller, Klaus Basciani, Reto Vogt, Andreas PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Measurement of partial pressure of oxygen (P(O2)) at high temporal resolution remains a technological challenge. This study introduces a novel P(O2) sensing technology based on Multi-Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF). The aim was to validate MFPF against polarographic Clark-type electrode (CTE) P(O2) measurements. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: MFPF technology was first investigated in N = 8 anaesthetised pigs at F(IO2) of 0.21, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. At each F(IO2) level, blood samples were withdrawn and P(O2) was measured in vitro with MFPF using two FOXY-AL300 probes immediately followed by CTE measurement. Secondly, MFPF-P(O2) readings were compared to CTE in an artificial circulatory setup (human packed red blood cells, haematocrit of 30%). The impacts of temperature (20, 30, 40°C) and blood flow (0.8, 1.6, 2.4, 3.2, 4.0 L min(−1)) on MFPF-P(O2) measurements were assessed. MFPF response time in the gas- and blood-phase was determined. Porcine MFPF-P(O2) ranged from 63 to 749 mmHg; the corresponding CTE samples from 43 to 712 mmHg. Linear regression: CTE = 15.59+1.18*MFPF (R(2) = 0.93; P<0.0001). Bland Altman analysis: mean(diff) 69.2 mmHg, range(diff) -50.1/215.6 mmHg, 1.96-SD limits -56.3/194.8 mmHg. In artificial circulatory setup, MFPF-P(O2) ranged from 20 to 567 mmHg and CTE samples from 11 to 575 mmHg. Linear regression: CTE = −8.73+1.05*MFPF (R(2) = 0.99; P<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis: mean(diff) 6.6 mmHg, range(diff) -9.7/20.5 mmHg, 1.96-SD limits -12.7/25.8 mmHg. Differences between MFPF and CTE-P(O2) due to variations of temperature were less than 6 mmHg (range 0–140 mmHg) and less than 35 mmHg (range 140–750 mmHg); differences due to variations in blood flow were less than 15 mmHg (all P-values>0.05). MFPF response-time (monoexponential) was 1.48±0.26 s for the gas-phase and 1.51±0.20 s for the blood-phase. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: MFPF-derived P(O2) readings were reproducible and showed excellent correlation and good agreement with Clark-type electrode-based P(O2) measurements. There was no relevant impact of temperature and blood flow upon MFPF-P(O2) measurements. The response time of the MFPF FOXY-AL300 probe was adequate for real-time sensing in the blood phase. Public Library of Science 2013-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3614895/ /pubmed/23565259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060591 Text en © 2013 Boehme et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Boehme, Stefan
Duenges, Bastian
Klein, Klaus U.
Hartwich, Volker
Mayr, Beate
Consiglio, Jolanda
Baumgardner, James E.
Markstaller, Klaus
Basciani, Reto
Vogt, Andreas
Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode
title Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode
title_full Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode
title_fullStr Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode
title_full_unstemmed Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode
title_short Multi Frequency Phase Fluorimetry (MFPF) for Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurement: Ex Vivo Validation by Polarographic Clark-Type Electrode
title_sort multi frequency phase fluorimetry (mfpf) for oxygen partial pressure measurement: ex vivo validation by polarographic clark-type electrode
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060591
work_keys_str_mv AT boehmestefan multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT duengesbastian multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT kleinklausu multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT hartwichvolker multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT mayrbeate multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT consigliojolanda multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT baumgardnerjamese multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT markstallerklaus multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT bascianireto multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode
AT vogtandreas multifrequencyphasefluorimetrymfpfforoxygenpartialpressuremeasurementexvivovalidationbypolarographicclarktypeelectrode