Cargando…

Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic

We collected surface- and deep-water samples (maximum depth 300 m) during the spring–summer transition in the coastal Arctic along a transect in the Kongsfjorden (Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen, Norway) to determine the structure of the active versus total marine bacterioplankton community using different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Corte, Daniele, Sintes, Eva, Yokokawa, Taichi, Herndl, Gerhard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3615173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12013
_version_ 1782264980255539200
author De Corte, Daniele
Sintes, Eva
Yokokawa, Taichi
Herndl, Gerhard J
author_facet De Corte, Daniele
Sintes, Eva
Yokokawa, Taichi
Herndl, Gerhard J
author_sort De Corte, Daniele
collection PubMed
description We collected surface- and deep-water samples (maximum depth 300 m) during the spring–summer transition in the coastal Arctic along a transect in the Kongsfjorden (Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen, Norway) to determine the structure of the active versus total marine bacterioplankton community using different approaches. Catalysed reporter deposition–fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with microautoradiography (MICRO–CARD–FISH) was used to determine the abundance and activity of different bacterial groups. The bacterial communities were dominated by members of Alphaproteobacteria followed by Bacteroidetes, whereas Gammaproteobacteria were present at low abundance but exhibited a high percentage of active cells taking up leucine. The clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes (16S rDNA) and 16S rRNA from two different depths were used to decipher the bacterial community structure. Independently of the type of clone libraries analysed (16S rDNA- or 16S rRNA-based), four major and four minor taxonomic groups were detected. The bacterioplankton community was mainly dominated at both the DNA and the RNA levels by Alphaproteobacteria followed by Gammaproteobacteria. The Rhodobacteriaceae were the most abundant members of the Alphaproteobacteria in both DNA and RNA clone libraries, followed by the SAR11 clade, which was only detectable at the 16S rDNA level. Moreover, there was a general agreement between the results obtained with both techniques, although some specific phylogenetic groups, such as SAR11 and Roseobacter, deviated substantially from this relation. These discrepancies are most likely linked to different physiological states among members of the bacterioplankton community. Combined, MICRO–CARD–FISH and DNA and RNA clone libraries, however, allowed for accurately quantifying different bacterial groups and their activity as well as a detailed phylogenetic insight into the fractions of present versus metabolically active bacterial groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3615173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36151732013-04-04 Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic De Corte, Daniele Sintes, Eva Yokokawa, Taichi Herndl, Gerhard J Environ Microbiol Rep Brief Reports We collected surface- and deep-water samples (maximum depth 300 m) during the spring–summer transition in the coastal Arctic along a transect in the Kongsfjorden (Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen, Norway) to determine the structure of the active versus total marine bacterioplankton community using different approaches. Catalysed reporter deposition–fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with microautoradiography (MICRO–CARD–FISH) was used to determine the abundance and activity of different bacterial groups. The bacterial communities were dominated by members of Alphaproteobacteria followed by Bacteroidetes, whereas Gammaproteobacteria were present at low abundance but exhibited a high percentage of active cells taking up leucine. The clone libraries of 16S rRNA genes (16S rDNA) and 16S rRNA from two different depths were used to decipher the bacterial community structure. Independently of the type of clone libraries analysed (16S rDNA- or 16S rRNA-based), four major and four minor taxonomic groups were detected. The bacterioplankton community was mainly dominated at both the DNA and the RNA levels by Alphaproteobacteria followed by Gammaproteobacteria. The Rhodobacteriaceae were the most abundant members of the Alphaproteobacteria in both DNA and RNA clone libraries, followed by the SAR11 clade, which was only detectable at the 16S rDNA level. Moreover, there was a general agreement between the results obtained with both techniques, although some specific phylogenetic groups, such as SAR11 and Roseobacter, deviated substantially from this relation. These discrepancies are most likely linked to different physiological states among members of the bacterioplankton community. Combined, MICRO–CARD–FISH and DNA and RNA clone libraries, however, allowed for accurately quantifying different bacterial groups and their activity as well as a detailed phylogenetic insight into the fractions of present versus metabolically active bacterial groups. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-04 2012-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3615173/ /pubmed/23565124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12013 Text en Copyright © 2013 Society for Applied MicrobiologyandBlackwell Publishing Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
De Corte, Daniele
Sintes, Eva
Yokokawa, Taichi
Herndl, Gerhard J
Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic
title Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic
title_full Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic
title_fullStr Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic
title_short Comparison between MICRO–CARD–FISH and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal Arctic
title_sort comparison between micro–card–fish and 16s rrna gene clone libraries to assess the active versus total bacterial community in the coastal arctic
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3615173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23565124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12013
work_keys_str_mv AT decortedaniele comparisonbetweenmicrocardfishand16srrnageneclonelibrariestoassesstheactiveversustotalbacterialcommunityinthecoastalarctic
AT sinteseva comparisonbetweenmicrocardfishand16srrnageneclonelibrariestoassesstheactiveversustotalbacterialcommunityinthecoastalarctic
AT yokokawataichi comparisonbetweenmicrocardfishand16srrnageneclonelibrariestoassesstheactiveversustotalbacterialcommunityinthecoastalarctic
AT herndlgerhardj comparisonbetweenmicrocardfishand16srrnageneclonelibrariestoassesstheactiveversustotalbacterialcommunityinthecoastalarctic