Cargando…

A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)

OBJECTIVE: Rectal microbicides are needed to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition associated with unprotected receptive anal intercourse. The MTN-007 study was designed to assess the safety (general and mucosal), adherence, and acceptability of a new reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mcgowan, Ian, Hoesley, Craig, Cranston, Ross D., Andrew, Philip, Janocko, Laura, Dai, James Y., Carballo-Dieguez, Alex, Ayudhya, Ratiya Kunjara Na, Piper, Jeanna, Hladik, Florian, Mayer, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060147
_version_ 1782265085113139200
author Mcgowan, Ian
Hoesley, Craig
Cranston, Ross D.
Andrew, Philip
Janocko, Laura
Dai, James Y.
Carballo-Dieguez, Alex
Ayudhya, Ratiya Kunjara Na
Piper, Jeanna
Hladik, Florian
Mayer, Ken
author_facet Mcgowan, Ian
Hoesley, Craig
Cranston, Ross D.
Andrew, Philip
Janocko, Laura
Dai, James Y.
Carballo-Dieguez, Alex
Ayudhya, Ratiya Kunjara Na
Piper, Jeanna
Hladik, Florian
Mayer, Ken
author_sort Mcgowan, Ian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Rectal microbicides are needed to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition associated with unprotected receptive anal intercourse. The MTN-007 study was designed to assess the safety (general and mucosal), adherence, and acceptability of a new reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel. METHODS: Participants were randomized 1∶1:1∶1 to receive the reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel, a hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel, a 2% nonoxynol-9 gel, or no treatment. Each gel was administered as a single dose followed by 7 daily doses. Mucosal safety evaluation included histology, fecal calprotectin, epithelial sloughing, cytokine expression (mRNA and protein), microarrays, flow cytometry of mucosal T cell phenotype, and rectal microflora. Acceptability and adherence were determined by computer-administered questionnaires and interactive telephone response, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants (45 men and 20 women) were recruited into the study. There were no significant differences between the numbers of ≥ Grade 2 adverse events across the arms of the study. Likelihood of future product use (acceptability) was 87% (reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel), 93% (hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel), and 63% (nonoxynol-9 gel). Fecal calprotectin, rectal microflora, and epithelial sloughing did not differ by treatment arms during the study. Suggestive evidence of differences was seen in histology, mucosal gene expression, protein expression, and T cell phenotype. These changes were mostly confined to comparisons between the nonoxynol-9 gel and other study arms. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel was safe and well tolerated rectally and should be advanced to Phase 2 development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01232803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3616022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-36160222013-04-09 A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007) Mcgowan, Ian Hoesley, Craig Cranston, Ross D. Andrew, Philip Janocko, Laura Dai, James Y. Carballo-Dieguez, Alex Ayudhya, Ratiya Kunjara Na Piper, Jeanna Hladik, Florian Mayer, Ken PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Rectal microbicides are needed to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition associated with unprotected receptive anal intercourse. The MTN-007 study was designed to assess the safety (general and mucosal), adherence, and acceptability of a new reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel. METHODS: Participants were randomized 1∶1:1∶1 to receive the reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel, a hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel, a 2% nonoxynol-9 gel, or no treatment. Each gel was administered as a single dose followed by 7 daily doses. Mucosal safety evaluation included histology, fecal calprotectin, epithelial sloughing, cytokine expression (mRNA and protein), microarrays, flow cytometry of mucosal T cell phenotype, and rectal microflora. Acceptability and adherence were determined by computer-administered questionnaires and interactive telephone response, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty-five participants (45 men and 20 women) were recruited into the study. There were no significant differences between the numbers of ≥ Grade 2 adverse events across the arms of the study. Likelihood of future product use (acceptability) was 87% (reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel), 93% (hydroxyethyl cellulose placebo gel), and 63% (nonoxynol-9 gel). Fecal calprotectin, rectal microflora, and epithelial sloughing did not differ by treatment arms during the study. Suggestive evidence of differences was seen in histology, mucosal gene expression, protein expression, and T cell phenotype. These changes were mostly confined to comparisons between the nonoxynol-9 gel and other study arms. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced glycerin formulation of tenofovir 1% gel was safe and well tolerated rectally and should be advanced to Phase 2 development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01232803. Public Library of Science 2013-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3616022/ /pubmed/23573238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060147 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mcgowan, Ian
Hoesley, Craig
Cranston, Ross D.
Andrew, Philip
Janocko, Laura
Dai, James Y.
Carballo-Dieguez, Alex
Ayudhya, Ratiya Kunjara Na
Piper, Jeanna
Hladik, Florian
Mayer, Ken
A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)
title A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)
title_full A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)
title_fullStr A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)
title_full_unstemmed A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)
title_short A Phase 1 Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Rectal Safety and Acceptability Study of Tenofovir 1% Gel (MTN-007)
title_sort phase 1 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled rectal safety and acceptability study of tenofovir 1% gel (mtn-007)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060147
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgowanian aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT hoesleycraig aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT cranstonrossd aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT andrewphilip aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT janockolaura aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT daijamesy aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT carballodieguezalex aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT ayudhyaratiyakunjarana aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT piperjeanna aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT hladikflorian aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT mayerken aphase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT mcgowanian phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT hoesleycraig phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT cranstonrossd phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT andrewphilip phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT janockolaura phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT daijamesy phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT carballodieguezalex phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT ayudhyaratiyakunjarana phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT piperjeanna phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT hladikflorian phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007
AT mayerken phase1randomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledrectalsafetyandacceptabilitystudyoftenofovir1gelmtn007