Cargando…
Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis
BACKGROUND: The 2009 H1N1 outbreak provides an opportunity to identify strengths and weaknesses of disease surveillance and notification systems that have been implemented in the past decade. METHODS: Drawing on a systematic review of the scientific literature, official documents, websites, and news...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059893 |
_version_ | 1782265090871918592 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Ying Lopez-Gatell, Hugo Alpuche-Aranda, Celia M. Stoto, Michael A. |
author_facet | Zhang, Ying Lopez-Gatell, Hugo Alpuche-Aranda, Celia M. Stoto, Michael A. |
author_sort | Zhang, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The 2009 H1N1 outbreak provides an opportunity to identify strengths and weaknesses of disease surveillance and notification systems that have been implemented in the past decade. METHODS: Drawing on a systematic review of the scientific literature, official documents, websites, and news reports, we constructed a timeline differentiating three kinds of events: (1) the emergence and spread of the pH1N1 virus, (2) local health officials’ awareness and understanding of the outbreak, and (3) notifications about the events and their implications. We then conducted a “critical event” analysis of the surveillance process to ascertain when health officials became aware of the epidemiologic facts of the unfolding pandemic and whether advances in surveillance notification systems hastened detection. RESULTS: This analysis revealed three critical events. First, medical personnel identified pH1N1in California children because of an experimental surveillance program, leading to a novel viral strain being identified by CDC. Second, Mexican officials recognized that unconnected outbreaks represented a single phenomenon. Finally, the identification of a pH1N1 outbreak in a New York City high school was hastened by awareness of the emerging pandemic. Analysis of the timeline suggests that at best the global response could have been about one week earlier (which would not have stopped spread to other countries), and could have been much later. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that investments in global surveillance and notification systems made an important difference in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. In particular, enhanced laboratory capacity in the U.S. and Canada led to earlier detection and characterization of the 2009 H1N1. This includes enhanced capacity at the federal, state, and local levels in the U.S., as well as a trilateral agreement enabling collaboration among U.S., Canada, and Mexico. In addition, improved global notification systems contributed by helping health officials understand the relevance and importance of their own information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3616047 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-36160472013-04-09 Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis Zhang, Ying Lopez-Gatell, Hugo Alpuche-Aranda, Celia M. Stoto, Michael A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The 2009 H1N1 outbreak provides an opportunity to identify strengths and weaknesses of disease surveillance and notification systems that have been implemented in the past decade. METHODS: Drawing on a systematic review of the scientific literature, official documents, websites, and news reports, we constructed a timeline differentiating three kinds of events: (1) the emergence and spread of the pH1N1 virus, (2) local health officials’ awareness and understanding of the outbreak, and (3) notifications about the events and their implications. We then conducted a “critical event” analysis of the surveillance process to ascertain when health officials became aware of the epidemiologic facts of the unfolding pandemic and whether advances in surveillance notification systems hastened detection. RESULTS: This analysis revealed three critical events. First, medical personnel identified pH1N1in California children because of an experimental surveillance program, leading to a novel viral strain being identified by CDC. Second, Mexican officials recognized that unconnected outbreaks represented a single phenomenon. Finally, the identification of a pH1N1 outbreak in a New York City high school was hastened by awareness of the emerging pandemic. Analysis of the timeline suggests that at best the global response could have been about one week earlier (which would not have stopped spread to other countries), and could have been much later. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis shows that investments in global surveillance and notification systems made an important difference in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. In particular, enhanced laboratory capacity in the U.S. and Canada led to earlier detection and characterization of the 2009 H1N1. This includes enhanced capacity at the federal, state, and local levels in the U.S., as well as a trilateral agreement enabling collaboration among U.S., Canada, and Mexico. In addition, improved global notification systems contributed by helping health officials understand the relevance and importance of their own information. Public Library of Science 2013-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3616047/ /pubmed/23573217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059893 Text en © 2013 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Ying Lopez-Gatell, Hugo Alpuche-Aranda, Celia M. Stoto, Michael A. Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis |
title | Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full | Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis |
title_fullStr | Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis |
title_short | Did Advances in Global Surveillance and Notification Systems Make a Difference in the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic?–A Retrospective Analysis |
title_sort | did advances in global surveillance and notification systems make a difference in the 2009 h1n1 pandemic?–a retrospective analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3616047/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23573217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangying didadvancesinglobalsurveillanceandnotificationsystemsmakeadifferenceinthe2009h1n1pandemicaretrospectiveanalysis AT lopezgatellhugo didadvancesinglobalsurveillanceandnotificationsystemsmakeadifferenceinthe2009h1n1pandemicaretrospectiveanalysis AT alpuchearandaceliam didadvancesinglobalsurveillanceandnotificationsystemsmakeadifferenceinthe2009h1n1pandemicaretrospectiveanalysis AT stotomichaela didadvancesinglobalsurveillanceandnotificationsystemsmakeadifferenceinthe2009h1n1pandemicaretrospectiveanalysis |